Long-, medium- and short-term dynamics of soil acidity in an integrated crop–livestock system under different grazing intensities
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Amanda P. Martins ; Diego Cecagno…
  • 关键词:Basic cations budgets ; pH ; Base saturation ; Aluminum saturation ; Soybean ; Sustainable agriculture
  • 刊名:Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
  • 出版年:2016
  • 出版时间:January 2016
  • 年:2016
  • 卷:104
  • 期:1
  • 页码:67-77
  • 全文大小:563 KB
  • 参考文献:Assmann JM, Anghinoni I, Martins AP, Costa SEVGA, Kunrath TR, Bayer C, Carvalho PCF, Franzluebbers AJ (2015) Carbon and nitrogen cycling in an integrated soybean–beef cattle production system under different grazing intensities. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 50:967–978CrossRef
    Bell LW, Kirkegaard JA, Swan A, Hunt JR, Huth NI, Fettell NA (2011) Impacts of soil damage by grazing livestock on crop productivity. Soil Tillage Res 113:19–29CrossRef
    Black AS (1992) Soil acidification in urine and urea-affected soil. Aust J Soil Res 30:989–999CrossRef
    Bolan NS, Hedley MJ (2003) Role of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycles in soil acidification. In: Rengel Z (ed) Handbook of soil acidity. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 29–56
    Bolan NS, Hedley MJ, White RE (1991) Processes of soil acidification during nitrogen cycling with emphasis on legume based pastures. Plant Soil 134:53–63CrossRef
    Butterly CR, Baldock JA, Tang C (2013) The contribution of crop residues to changes in soil pH under field conditions. Plant Soil 366:185–198CrossRef
    Carvalho PCF, Anghinoni I, Moraes A, Souza ED, Sulc MR, Lang CR, Flores JPC, Lopes MLT, Silva JLS, Conte O, Wesp CL, Levien R, Fontaneli RS, Bayer C (2010) Managing grazing animals to achieve nutrient cycling and soil improvement in no-till integrated systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 88:259–273CrossRef
    Cecagno D, Costa SEVGA, Anghinoni I, Kunrath TR, Martins AP, Reichert JM, Gubiani PI, Balerini F, Fink JR, Carvalho PCF (2016) Least limiting water range and soybean yield in a long-term, no-till, integrated crop–livestock system under different grazing intensities. Soil Tillage Res 156:54–62CrossRef
    CONAB—National Supply Company (Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento). Acompanhamento da safra brasileira–grãos. http://​www.​conab.​gov.​br . Accessed 26 Dec 2015
    Costa SEVGA, Souza ED, Anghinoni I, Carvalho PCF, Martins AP, Kunrath TR, Cecagno D, Balerini F (2014) Impact of an integrated no-till crop–livestock system on phosphorus distribution, availability and stock. Agric Ecosyst Environ 190:43–51CrossRef
    Coventry DR, Farhoodi A, Xu RK (2003) Management soil acidification through crop rotations in Southern Australia. In: Rengel Z (ed) Handbook of soil acidity. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 407–429
    CQFS RS/SC—Chemistry and Soil Fertility Commission of the Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina States (2004) Liming and fertilizing manual (“Manual de adubação e de calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina”). Brazilian Soil Science Society, Porto Alegre
    Di HJ, Cameron KC (2004) Effects of the nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide on potassium, magnesium and calcium leaching in grazed grassland. Soil Use Manag 20:2–7CrossRef
    FAO—Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2010) An international consultation on integrated crop–livestock systems for development: The way forward for sustainable production intensification. FAO, IFAD/FIDA, IICA and Embrapa, Rome
    Flores JPC, Anghinoni I, Cassol LC, Carvalho PCF, Leite JGDB, Fraga TI (2007) Soil physical attributes and soybean yield in an integrated livestock–crop system with different pasture heights in no-tillage. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 31:771–780CrossRef
    Flores JPC, Cassol LC, Anghinoni I, Carvalho PCF (2008) Chemical attributes of an oxisol under no-tillage submitted to surface liming and distinct grazing pressures in a crop–livestock integration system. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 32:2385–2396CrossRef
    Haynes RJ, Williams PH (1993) Nutrient cycling and soil fertility in the grazed pasture ecosystem. Adv Agron 49:119–199CrossRef
    Kunrath TR, Cadenazzi M, Brambilla DM, Anghinoni I, Moraes A, Barro RS, Carvalho PCF (2014) Management targets for continuously stocked mixed oat × annual ryegrass pasture in a no-till integrated crop–livestock system. Eur J Agron 57:71–76CrossRef
    Lemaire G, Franzluebbers A, Carvalho PCF, Dedieu B (2014) Integrated crop–livestock systems: strategies to achieve synergy between agricultural production and environmental quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ 190:4–8CrossRef
    Lyons R, Hanselka CW (2001) Grazing and browsing: how plants are affected. http://​repository.​tamu.​edu/​bitstream/​handle/​1969.​1/​87088/​pdf_​1523.​pdf?​sequence=​1 . Accessed 30 June 2013
    Martins AP, Costa SEVGA, Anghinoni I, Kunrath TR, Balerini F, Cecagno D, Carvalho PCF (2014a) Soil acidification and basic cation use efficiency in an integrated no-till crop–livestock system under different grazing intensities. Agric Ecosyst Environ 195:18–28CrossRef
    Martins AP, Anghinoni I, Costa SEVGA, Carlos FS, Nichel GH, Silva RAP, Carvalho PCF (2014b) Amelioration of soil acidity and soybean yield after surface lime reapplication to a long-term no-till integrated crop–livestock system under varying grazing intensities. Soil Tillage Res 144:141–149CrossRef
    Moraes A, Carvalho PCF, Anghinoni I, Lustosa SBC, Costa SEVGA, Kunrath TR (2014) Integrated crop–livestock systems in the Brazilian subtropics. Eur J Agron 57:4–9CrossRef
    Oliveira ACB, Rosa APSA (2014) Technical Recommendations for Soybean (“Indicações técnicas para a cultura da soja no Rio Grande do Sul e em Santa Catarina, safras 2014/2015 e 2015/2016”). Embrapa Clima Temperado, Pelotas
    Oliveira CAO, Bremm C, Anghinoni I, Moraes A, Kunrath TR, Carvalho PCF (2014) Comparison of an integrated crop–livestock system with soybean only: economic and production responses in southern Brazil. Renew Agric Food Syst 29:230–238CrossRef
    Orr RJ, Griffith BA, Cook JE, Champion RA (2012) Ingestion and excretion of nitrogen and phosphorus by beef cattle under contrasting grazing intensities. Grass Forage Sci 67:111–118CrossRef
    Powell JM, Ikpe FN, Somda ZC, Fernándes-Rivera S (1998) Urine effects on soil chemical properties and the impact of urine and dung on pearl millet yield. Exp Agric 34:259–276CrossRef
    Price JF, Schweigert BS (1994) Ciencia de la carne y de los productos carnicos. Acribia, Zaragoza
    Ryschawy J, Choisis N, Choisis JP, Joannon A, Gibon A (2012) Mixed crop–livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming? Animal 6:1722–1730PubMed CrossRef
    Sá JCM, Cerri CC, Lal R, Dick WA, Piccolo MC, Feigl BE (2009) Soil organic carbon and fertility interactions affected by a tillage chronosequence in a Brazilian Oxisol. Soil Tillage Res 104:56–64CrossRef
    Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service Agriculture Handbook, 436
    Tang C, Rengel Z (2003) Role of plant cation/anion uptake ratio in soil acidification. In: Rengel Z (ed) Handbook of soil acidity. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 57–82
    Tang C, Mclay CDA, Barton LA (1997) Comparison of the potential proton excretion of twelve pasture legumes grown in nutrient solution. Aust J Exp Agric 48:1025–1032CrossRef
    Tedesco MJ, Gianello C, Bissani CA, Bohnen H, Volkweiss SJ (1995) Analyses of soil, plant and other materials. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre
    Tracy BF, Zhang Y (2008) Soil compaction, corn yield response, and soil nutrient pool dynamics within an integrated crop livestock system in Illinois. Crop Sci 48:1211–1218CrossRef
    Unkovich M, Sanford P, Pate J, Hyder M (1998) Effects of grazing on plant and soil nitrogen relations of pasture-crop rotations. Aust J Soil Res 49:475–485CrossRef
    Whitehead DC (2000) Nutrient elements in grassland: soil–plant–animal relationships. CAB International, WallingfordCrossRef
    Wright IA, Tarawali S, Blümmel M, Gerard B, Teufel N, Herrero M (2012) Integrating crops and livestock in subtropical agricultural systems. J Sci Food Agric 92:1010–1015PubMed CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Amanda P. Martins (1)
    Diego Cecagno (1)
    José Bernardo M. Borin (1)
    Fernando Arnuti (1)
    Sarah H. Lochmann (1)
    Ibanor Anghinoni (1)
    Carlos A. Bissani (1)
    Cimélio Bayer (1)
    Paulo César F. Carvalho (2)

    1. Department of Soil Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 7712, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91540-000, Brazil
    2. Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 7712, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91540-000, Brazil
  • 刊物类别:Earth and Environmental Science
  • 刊物主题:Environment
    Soil Science and Conservation
  • 出版者:Springer Netherlands
  • ISSN:1573-0867
文摘
Integrated crop–livestock systems (ICLS) are being highlighted as a sustainable way to produce food and increase the efficiency of land use. One of the important factors in this type of system is the impact of animals on soil acidity dynamics. Thus, the objective of the present study was to evaluate soil acidity dynamics over long- (11 years), medium- (3 years with semiannual evaluations) and short-term (6 months during pasture season) studies in an integrated soybean–beef cattle system exposed to different grazing intensities. An experiment was established in 2001 in a Rhodic Hapludox soil with a succession of soybean (summer) and a mix of black oat + Italian ryegrass (winter). Treatments consisted of different grazing intensities during the winter season: intensive grazing (IG), moderate grazing (MG), and no-grazing (NG). Soil was sampled at different times to evaluate the soil attributes related to acidity. The Ca and Mg budgets were also calculated for the long-term study. In general, the different grazing intensities in ICLS do not affect soil acidity dynamics. However, the presence of animals (ICLS with IG or MG) causes a decrease in the long-term soil acidification compared with NG. This is due to lower amounts of non-productive losses of Ca and Mg, which result in higher pH values and lower levels of Al saturation. The same trend is observed in the medium- and short-term studies: in most situations, the integrated system is less acidic, but the grazing intensity performed does not affect the soil acidity. Keywords Basic cations budgets pH Base saturation Aluminum saturation Soybean Sustainable agriculture

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700