An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Ethical Beliefs Among Early Childhood Teachers

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Stacey French-Lee ; Caitlin McMunn Dooley
• 关键词：Ethics ; Early childhood education ; Participatory professional development
• 刊名：Early Childhood Education Journal
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：September 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：43
• 期：5
• 页码：377-384
• 全文大小：374 KB
• 参考文献：Baptiste, N. E., & Reyes, L. V. (2007). Understanding ethics in early care and education: revised code and administrator’s supplement. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  Bourke, O. (2010). Educating teachers about a code of ethical conduct. Ethics and Education, 5(20), 159-72.
  Brophy-Herb, H., Kostelnik, M., & Stein, L. (2001). A developmental approach to teaching about ethics using the NAEYC code of ethical conduct. Young Children, 56(1), 80-8.
  Campbell, E. (2000). Professional ethics in teaching: Towards the development of a code of practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 203-21.
  Castle, K. (2009). What do early childhood professionals do? Dimensions of Early Childhood, 37(3), 4-0.
  Cochran-Smith, M. A., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. NY: Teachers College Press.
  Conder, J., Milner, P., & Mirfin-Veitch, B. (2011). Reflections on a participatory project: The rewards and challenges for the lead researchers. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 36(1), 39-8.View Article
  Colnerud, G. (1997). Ethical conflicts in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(6), 627-35.
  Cranston, J. (2011). Relational trust: The glue that binds a professional learning community. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 59-2.
  Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2009). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  Ehrich, L., Kimber, M., Millwater, J., & Cranston, N. (2011). Ethical dilemmas: A model to understand teacher practice. Teachers and Teaching, 17(2), 173-85.View Article
  Feeney, S. (2010). Celebrating the 20th anniversary of NAEYC’s code of ethical conduct—ethics today in early care and education: Review, reflection, and the future. Young Children, 65(2), 72-7.
  Feeney, S., & Freeman, N. K. (2005). Ethics and the early childhood educator: Using the NAEYC Code. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
  Feeney, S., Freeman, N. K., & Moravcik, E. (2008). Teaching the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct: Activity Sourcebook. Washington, D.C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
  Feeney, S., & Sysko, L. (1986). Professional ethics in early childhood education: Survey results. Young Children, 42(1), 15-2.
  Freeman, N., & Swick, K. (2007). The ethical dimensions of working with parents: Using the code of ethics when faced with a difficult decision. Childhood Education, 83(3), 163-69.View Article
  Frisby, W., Reid, C., Millar, S., & Hoeber, L. (2005). Putting “participatory-into participatory forms of action research. Journal of Sports Management, 19, 367-86.
  Giovacco-Johnson, T. (2010). Applied ethics as a foundation in early childhood teacher education: exploring the connections to possibilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 449-56.View Article
  Graham, P. (2007). Improving teacher effectiveness through structured collaboration: A case study of a professional learning community. Research in Middle Level Education, 31(1), 1-7.
  Guishard, M. (2009). The false paths, the endless labors, the turns now this way and now that: Participatory action research, mutual vulnerability, and the politics of inquiry. Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education, 41(1), 85-05.View Article
  Hord, S. M. (2009). Professional learning communities: Educators work together toward a shared purpose. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 40-3.
  Husu, J., & Tirri, K. (2001). Teachers-ethical choices in sociomoral settings. Journal of Moral Education, 30(4), 361-75.View Article
  Kidd, S., & Kral, M. (2005). Practicing participatory action research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 187-95.View Article
  Klugman, K., & Stump, B. (2006). The effect of ethics training upon individual choice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 30(2), 181-92.View Article
  Lyon, A., Bell, M., Croll, N., Jackson, R., & Gratton, C. (2010). Maculate conceptions: Power, process, and creativity in participatory research. Rural Sociology, 75(4), 538-59.View Article
  National School Reform Faculty, Harmony Education Center. (2012). Retrieved from http://?www.?nsrfharmony.?org/?index.?html .
  Newman, L., & Findlay, J. (2008). Communities of practice: Using new technologies for ethical dialectical discourse. Educational Technology and Society, 11(4), 16-8.
  O’Neill, J., & Bourke, R. (2010). Educating teachers about a code of ethical conduct. Ethics and Education, 5(20), 159-72.View Article
  Ozturk, S. (2010). An investigation of the ethical decision-making of preschool teachers: A cultural study of a sample in Turkey. Early Child Development and Care, 181(4), 517-34.View Article
  Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage Publications.
  Rodd, J., & Clyde, M. (1990). Ethical dilemma
• 作者单位：Stacey French-Lee (1)
  Caitlin McMunn Dooley (1)
  
  1. Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3999, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA
  
• 刊物类别：Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
• 刊物主题：Education
  Learning and Instruction
  Education
  Education and Society
  Sociology
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-1707

文摘

The purpose of this study is to learn how early childhood educators make ethical decisions. The study also explores how these educators might learn to base their ethical decisions on a professionally accepted ethical code through a participatory professional development process. The professional code of ethics used in this study is the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Code of Ethical Conduct. Study participants are six early childhood teachers who work with children aged Birth through 5?years old in a University Lab School. The results of the analysis show that from pre-assessment to the post-assessment, teachers shifted in how they identified and resolved professional ethical dilemmas. As a result of participation in the professional learning and discussions of ethical dilemmas, participants gained new understanding and familiarity with professional ethical behavior and were able to distinguish ethical dilemmas from other judgments as they grew more familiar with and able to use the NAEYC Code. Although participants demonstrated that they are better able to identify and resolve ethical dilemmas, this study concludes by suggesting additional professional learning and research on how protocols and professional learning communities can support teachers-ethical reasoning.