Outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation of acute proximal pole scaphoid fractures

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：David M. Brogan ; Steven L. Moran ; Alexander Y. Shin
• 关键词：ORIF ; Proximal pole ; Scaphoid fracture
• 刊名：HAND
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：June 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：10
• 期：2
• 页码：227-232
• 全文大小：663 KB
• 参考文献：1.Chang MA, Bishop AT, Moran SL, et al. The outcomes and complications of 1,2-intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicled vascularized bone grafting of scaphoid nonunions. J Hand Surg. 2006;31:387-6.
  2.Cooney WP, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Fractures of the scaphoid: a rational approach to management. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1980;149:90-.
  3.DeMaagd RL, Engber WD. Retrograde Herbert screw fixation for treatment of proximal pole scaphoid nonunions. J Hand Surg. 1989;14A:996-003.
  4.Gelberman RH, Menon J. The vascularity of the scaphoid bone. J Hand Surg. 1980;5:508-3.
  5.Gelberman RH, Wolock BS, Siegel DB. Current concepts review: fractures and non-unions of the carpal scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg. 1989;71A:1560-.
  6.Kakar S, Shin AY. Ununited fracture of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with avascular necrosis. J Hand Surg. 2011;36A:1522-.
  7.Krimmer H. Management of acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal pole of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg. 2002;27B:245-.
  8.Leslie IJ, Dickson RA. The fractured carpal scaphoid. Natural history and factors influencing outcome. J Bone Joint Surg. 1981;63B:225-0.
  9.Little CP, Burston BJ, Hopkinson-Woolley J, et al. Failure of surgery for scaphoid non-union is associated with smoking. J Hand Surg. 2006;31B:252-.
  10.Rettig ME, Raskin KB. Retrograde compression screw fixation of acute proximal pole scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg. 1999;24:1206-0.
  11.Ring D, Jupiter JB, Herndon JH. Acute fractures of the scaphoid. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:225-1.PubMed
  12.Segalman KA, Graham TJ. Scaphoid proximal pole fractures and nonunions. J Am Soc Surg Hand. 2004;4:233-9.
  13.Szabo RM, Manske D. Displaced fractures of the scaphoid. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1988;230:30-.
  14.Taleisnik J, Kelly PJ. The extraosseous and intraosseous blood supply of the scaphoid bone. J Bone Joint Surg. 1966;48A:1125-7.
  15.Trumble TE, Gilbert M, Murray LW, et al. Displaced scaphoid fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation with a cannulated screw. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82A:633-1.
  16.Trumble TE, Vo D. Proximal pole scaphoid fractures and nonunion. J Am Soc Surg Hand. 2001;1:155-1.
  17.Yin ZG, Zhang JB, Kan SL, et al. Treatment of acute scaphoid fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2007;460:142-1.
  
• 作者单位：David M. Brogan (1)
  Steven L. Moran (1) (2)
  Alexander Y. Shin (1)
  
  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
  2. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
  
• 刊物主题：Surgery; Plastic Surgery; Orthopedics; Surgical Orthopedics;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1558-9455

文摘

Background Proximal pole scaphoid fractures are less common than waist fractures, and successful management can be difficult. We hypothesize that time to union is increased by delays in surgical fixation, greater initial displacement, and higher energy mechanisms of injury. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of acute proximal pole scaphoid fractures at our institution over a 19-year period. A review of clinical as well as radiographic data was undertaken. The mechanism of injury, patient demographics, timing of surgery, initial displacement, fixation method, smoking status, and lunate morphology were recorded. Functional outcome measures were recorded when available. Univariate analysis using Kaplan-Meier survival curves was performed. Results A total of 10 out of 23 patients (43?%) showed evidence of union at 14?weeks post-injury. Rates of early union were higher in non-displaced fractures (70?%) when compared to displaced fractures (23?%). Similarly, fractures sustained via low energy mechanisms had a higher rate of early union compared to high energy mechanisms (69 versus 10?%). A delay in ORIF did not appear to influence rate of union. Conclusions Initial displacement and mechanism of injury have the most significant effects on early rates of union. Delay in ORIF of up to 28?days did not affect the rate of initial union, but the authors recommend early fixation of these fractures to prevent further displacement. Patients with widely displaced fractures or those with high energy mechanisms should be counseled regarding prolonged healing time. Level of Evidence: IV—therapeutic