Training readers to improve their accuracy in grading Crohn’s disease activity on MRI

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jeroen A. W. Tielbeek (1)
  Shandra Bipat (1)
  Thierry N. Boellaard (1)
  C. Yung Nio (1)
  Jaap Stoker (1)
  
• 关键词：Crohn’s disease activity ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Staging ; Training ; Learning curve
• 刊名：European Radiology
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：May 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：24
• 期：5
• 页码：1059-1067
• 全文大小：642 KB
• 参考文献：1. D’Haens GR, Fedorak R, Lémann M et al (2009) Endpoints for clinical trials evaluating disease modification and structural damage in adults with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:1599-604 CrossRef
  2. Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ (2012) Crohn’s disease. Lancet 380:1590-605 CrossRef
  3. Dignass A, Van Assche G, Lindsay JO et al (2010) The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: Current management. J Crohns Colitis 4:28-2 CrossRef
  4. Vermeire S, Ferrante M, Rutgeerts P (2013) Recent advances: personalised use of current Crohn’s disease therapeutic options. Gut 62:1511-515 CrossRef
  5. Tielbeek JAW, L?wenberg M, Bipat S et al (2013) Serial magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring medical therapy effects in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 19:1943-950
  6. Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Stokkers PCF, Stoker J (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 19:1450-460 CrossRef
  7. Wu L-M, Xu J-R, Gu H-Y, Hua J, Hu J (2013) Is magnetic resonance imaging a reliable diagnostic tool in the evaluation of active Crohn’s disease in the small bowel? J Clin Gastroenterol 47:328-38 CrossRef
  8. Negaard A, Mulahasanovic A, Reisaeter LA, Aasekjaer K, Sandvik L, Klow N-E (2008) Crohn’s disease evaluated with magnetic resonance enteroclysis: diagnostic performance of experienced and inexperienced readers before and after training. Acta Radiol 49:967-74 CrossRef
  9. Maccioni F, Bruni A, Viscido A et al (2006) MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology 238:517-30 CrossRef
  10. Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L et al (2007) A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 17:2294-301 CrossRef
  11. Fiorino G, Bonifacio C, Padrenostro M et al (2013) Comparison between 1.5 and 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance enterography for the assessment of disease activity and complications in ileo-colonic crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci 58:3246-255 CrossRef
  12. Steward MJ, Punwani S, Proctor I et al (2012) Non-perforating small bowel Crohn’s disease assessed by MRI enterography: derivation and histopathological validation of an MR-based activity index. Eur J Radiol 81:2080-088 CrossRef
  13. Tolan DJM, Greenhalgh R, Zealley IA, Halligan S, Taylor SA (2010) MR enterographic manifestations of small bowel Crohn disease. Radiographics 30:367-84 CrossRef
  14. Ziech MLW, Bossuyt PMM, Laghi A, Lauenstein TC, Taylor SA, Stoker J (2012) Grading luminal Crohn’s disease: which MRI features are considered as important? Eur J Radiol 81:e467–e472 CrossRef
  15. Florie J, Horsthuis K, Hommes DW et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging compared with ileocolonoscopy in evaluating disease severity in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:1221-228 CrossRef
  16. Rimola J, Rodriguez S, García-Bosch O et al (2009) Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Gut 58:1113-120 CrossRef
  17. Sailer J, Peloschek P, Reinisch W et al (2008) Anastomotic recurrence of Crohn’s disease after ileocolic resection: comparison of MR enteroclysis with endoscopy. Eur Radiol 18:2512-521 CrossRef
  18. Zappa M, Stefanescu C, Cazals-Hatem D et al (2011) Which magnetic resonance imaging findings accurately evaluate inflammation in small bowel Crohn’s disease? A retrospective comparison with surgical pathologic analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17:984-93 CrossRef
  19. Tielbeek JAW, Ziech MLW, Li Z et al (2013) Evaluation of conventional, dynamic contrast enhanced and diffusion weighted MRI for quantitative Crohn’s disease assessment with histopathology of surgical specimens. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-013-3015-7
  20. Punwani S, Rodriguez-Justo M, Bainbridge A et al (2009) Mural inflammation in Crohn disease: location-matched histologic validation of MR imaging features. Radiology 252:712-20 CrossRef
  21. Rimola J, Ordás I, Rodriguez S et al (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of Crohn’s disease: validation of parameters of severity and quantitative index of activity. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17:1759-768 CrossRef
  22. Girometti R, Zuiani C, Toso F et al (2008) MRI scoring system including dynamic motility evaluation in assessing the activity of Crohn’s disease of the terminal ileum. Acad Radiol 15:153-64 CrossRef
  23. Van Assche G, Herrmann KA, Louis E et al (2013) Effects of infliximab therapy on transmural lesions as assessed by magnetic resonance enteroclysis in patients with ileal Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 7:950-57 CrossRef
  24. Tielbeek JAW, Makanyanga J, Bipat S et al (2013) Grading Crohn's disease activity with MRI: interobserver variability of MRI features, MRI scoring of severity and correlation with Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity. Am J Roentgenol 201:1220-228 CrossRef
  25. Leeuwenburgh MMN, Wiarda BM, Bipat S et al (2012) Acute appendicitis on abdominal MR images: training readers to improve diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 264:455-63 CrossRef
  26. Oussalah A, Laurent V, Bruot O et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance without bowel preparation for detecting colonic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 59:1056-065 CrossRef
  27. Masselli G, Gualdi G (2012) MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 264:333-48 CrossRef
  28. Ajaj WM, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G et al (2005) Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity. Gut 54:257-63 CrossRef
  29. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Halligan S et al (2009) CT colonography polyp matching: differences between experienced readers. Eur Radiol 19:1723-730 CrossRef
  30. Bankier AA, Levine D, Halpern EF, Kressel HY (2010) Consensus interpretation in imaging research: is there a better way? Radiology 257:14-7 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Jeroen A. W. Tielbeek (1)
  Shandra Bipat (1)
  Thierry N. Boellaard (1)
  C. Yung Nio (1)
  Jaap Stoker (1)
  
  1. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, AMC Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  
• ISSN：1432-1084

文摘

Objectives To prospectively evaluate if training with direct feedback improves grading accuracy of inexperienced readers for Crohn’s disease activity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods Thirty-one inexperienced readers assessed 25 cases as a baseline set. Subsequently, all readers received training and assessed 100 cases with direct feedback per case, randomly assigned to four sets of 25 cases. The cases in set 4 were identical to the baseline set. Grading accuracy, understaging, overstaging, mean reading times and confidence scores (scale 0-10) were compared between baseline and set 4, and between the four consecutive sets with feedback. Proportions of grading accuracy, understaging and overstaging per set were compared using logistic regression analyses. Mean reading times and confidence scores were compared by t-tests. Results Grading accuracy increased from 66?% (95?% CI, 56-74?%) at baseline to 75?% (95?% CI, 66-81?%) in set 4 (P = 0.003). Understaging decreased from 15?% (95?% CI, 9-23?%) to 7?% (95?% CI, 3-14?%) (P < 0.001). Overstaging did not change significantly (20?% vs 19?%). Mean reading time decreased from 6?min 37?s to 4?min 35?s (P < 0.001). Mean confidence increased from 6.90 to 7.65 (P < 0.001). During training, overall grading accuracy, understaging, mean reading times and confidence scores improved gradually. Conclusions Inexperienced readers need training with at least 100 cases to achieve the literature reported grading accuracy of 75?%. Key points -Most radiologists have limited experience of grading Crohn’s disease activity on MRI. -Inexperienced readers need training in the MRI assessment of Crohn’s disease. -Grading accuracy, understaging, reading time and confidence scores improved during training. -Radiologists and residents show similar accuracy in grading Crohn’s disease. -After 100 cases, grading accuracy can be reached as reported in the literature.