Classification tree analysis to examine influences on colorectal cancer screening
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Gregory M. Dominick ; Mia A. Papas ; Michelle L. Rogers…
- 关键词：Colorectal cancer screening ; HINTS ; Classification tree analysis ; Numeracy
- 刊名：Cancer Causes & Control
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：March 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：26
- 期：3
- 页码：443-454
- 全文大小：462 KB
- 参考文献：1. National Cancer Institute (2010) A snapshot of colorectal cancer. Incidence and mortality. http://www.cancer.gov/researchandfunding/snapshots/colorectal. Accessed 15 June 2014
2. American Cancer Society (2014) Cancer facts and figures, 2014. http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/cancerfactsfigures2014/. Accessed 15 June 2014
3. Walsh JME, Terdiman JP (2003) Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. JAMA 289(10):1288-296 CrossRef
4. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ (2007) Cancer screening in the United States, 2007: a review of current guidelines, practices, and prospects. CA Cancer J Clin 57:90-04 CrossRef
5. National Cancer Institute (2014) Cancer trends progress report: 2011-012 update. http://progressreport.cancer.gov/doc_detail.asp?pid=1&did=2011&chid=102&coid=1018&mid. Accessed 20 June 2014
6. Rakowski W, Clark MA (1998) Do groups of women aged 50 to 75 match the national average mammography rate? Am J Prev Med 15(3):187-97 CrossRef
7. Vernon SW (1997) Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst 89(19):1406-422 CrossRef
8. Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA (2008) Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Cause Control 19(4):339-59 CrossRef
9. Consedine NS, Magai C, Krivoshekova YS, Ryzewicz L, Neugut AI (2004) Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(4):501-10
10. Davids S, Schapira M, McAuliffe T, Nattinger A (2004) Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population. J Gen Intern Med 19(4):310-15 CrossRef
11. Kiviniemi M, Bennett A, Zaiter M, Marshall J (2011) Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual level health behavior constructs and screening behavior. Psycho Oncology 20:1023-033 CrossRef
12. Gimeno Garcia A, Hernandez Alvarez Buylla N, Nicolas-Perez D, Quintero E (2014) Public awareness of colorectal cancer screening: knowledge, attitudes, and interventions for increasing screening uptake. Oncology. doi:10.1155/2014/425787
13. Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J (2002) Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin 52(3):134-49 CrossRef
14. Schwartzberg JG, VanGeest J, Wang CC (eds) (2005) Understanding health literacy: implications for medicine and public health. American Medical Association Press, Chicago, IL
15. United States Department of Health and Human Services (2014) Health literacy. http://www.health.gov/communication/literacy/. Accessed 21 May 2014
16. Miller DP Jr, Brownlee CD, McCoy TP, Pignone MP (2007) The effect of health literacy on knowledge and receipt of colorectal cancer screening: a survey study. BMC Fam Pract. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-8-16
17. United States Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Quick guide to health literacy. (2010). http://www.health.gov/communication/literacy/quickguide/. Accessed 24 May 2014
18. Ciampa PJ, White RO, Perrin EM et al (2013) The association of acculturation and health literacy, numeracy and health-related skills in Spanish-speaking caregivers of young children. J Immigr Minor Health 15(3):492-98
文摘
Purpose Identifying correlates of colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) is critical for cancer control and prevention. Classification tree analysis (CTA) is a potentially powerful analytic tool that can identify distinct population subgroups for which CRCS is influenced by any number of multivariable interactions. This study used CTA to identify correlates of CRCS for exclusive population subgroups. Methods Data were obtained from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) and analyzed in 2014. CTA was employed to determine the association between demographic (n?=?11), psychosocial (n?=?6), and numeracy (n?=?3) variables and CRCS status of adults ?0?years (n?=?3,769). Results Overall CRCS rate was 66.9?%. Level of doctor avoidance (three categories) was the initial splitting variable, leading to a total of 21 terminal node subgroups of CRCS utilization: (1) avoid doctor, not for fear of illness/death [n?=?625 (16.5?%), four subgroups]; (2) avoid doctor, fear illness/death [n?=?366 (9.7?%), two subgroups]; (3) do not avoid doctor [n?=?2,778 (73.7?%), 15 subgroups]. Conclusions Doctor avoidance was an important behavioral influence on CRCS adherence. Use of CTA to identify unique characteristics within population subgroups has merit for tailoring future intervention strategies. Community-based approaches may be effective for reaching individuals who avoid routine doctor visits.