Moderate agreement between self-reported stroke and hospital-recorded stroke in two cohorts of Australian women: a validation study
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Caroline A Jackson (1)
    Gita D Mishra (1)
    Leigh Tooth (1)
    Julie Byles (2)
    Annette Dobson (1)

    1. Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research
    ; School of Public Health ; University of Queensland ; Herston ; QLD ; 4006 ; Australia
    2. Research Centre for Gender
    ; Health and Ageing ; University of Newcastle ; Callaghan ; NSW ; 2308 ; Australia
  • 关键词:Epidemiology ; Stroke ; Cerebrovascular disease ; Validation studies ; Self ; report ; Hospitalisation
  • 刊名:BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:December 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:15
  • 期:1
  • 全文大小:56 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Colditz G, Martin P, Stampfer M, Willett WC, Sampson L, Rosner B, / et al.: Validation of questionnaire information on risk factors and disease outcomes in a prospective cohort study of women. / Am J Epidemiol 1986, 123:894-00.
    2. Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Pasanen M, Oja P, Vuori I: Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records of chronic diseaes in middle-aged and elderly Finnish men and women. / Am J Epidemiol 1997, 145:762-. 10.1093/aje/145.8.762 CrossRef
    3. Simpson C, Boyd C, Carlson M, Griswold ME, Guralnik JM, Fried LP: Agreement between self-report of disease diagnoses and medical record validation in disabled older women: factors that modify agreement. / JAGS 2004, 52:123-. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52021.x CrossRef
    4. Carter K, Barber A, Shaw C: How does self-reported history of stroke compare to hospitalisation data in a population-based survey in New Zealand? / Stroke 2010, 41:2678-680. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.598268 CrossRef
    5. Machon M, Arriola L, Larranaga N, Amiano P, Moreno-Iribas C, Agudo A, / et al.: Validity of self-reported prevalent cases of stroke and acute myocardial infarction in the Spanish cohort of the EPIC study. / JECH 2013, 67:71-.
    6. Yamagishi K, Ikeda A, Iso H, Inoue M, Tsugane S, for the JPHC Study Group, / et al.: Self-reported stroke and myocardial infarction had adequate sensitivity in a population-based prospective study JPHC (Japan Public Health Center)-based prospective study. / J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62:667-3. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.07.016 CrossRef
    7. Engstad T, Bonaa M, Viitanen M: Validity of self-reported stroke. / Stroke 2000, 31:1602-. 10.1161/01.STR.31.7.1602 CrossRef
    8. Okura Y, Urban L, Mahoney D, Jacobsen S, Rodeheffer R: Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure. / J Clin Epidemiol 2004, 57:1096-03. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.005 CrossRef
    9. O'Mahony P, Dobson R, Rodgers H, James O, Thomson R: Validation of a population screening questionnaire to assess prevalence of stroke. / Stroke 1995, 26:1334-. 10.1161/01.STR.26.8.1334 CrossRef
    10. Lee C, Dobson A, Brown W, Bryson L, Byles J, Warner-Smith P, / et al.: Cohort profile: the Australian longitudinal study on Women's health. / Int J Epidemiol 2005, 34:987-1. 10.1093/ije/dyi098 CrossRef
    11. Silveira E, Taft C, Sundh V, Waern M, Palsson S, Steen B: Performance of the SF-36 health survey in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders in an elderly female Swedish population. / Qual Life Res 2005, 14:1263-4. 10.1007/s11136-004-7753-5 CrossRef
    12. Altman D: / Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
    13. Sim J, Wright CC: The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. / Phys Ther 2005, 85:257-8.
    14. Libman R, Wirowski E, Alvir J, Rao H: C
  • 刊物主题:Theory of Medicine/Bioethics; Statistical Theory and Methods; Statistics for Life Sciences, Medicine, Health Sciences;
  • 出版者:BioMed Central
  • ISSN:1471-2288
文摘
Background Conflicting findings on the validity of self-reported stroke from existing studies creates uncertainty about the appropriateness of using self-reported stroke in epidemiological research. We aimed to compare self-reported stroke against hospital-recorded stroke, and investigate reasons for disagreement. Methods We included participants from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health born in 1921-6 (n--556) and 1946-1 (n--119), who were living in New South Wales and who returned all survey questionnaires over a defined period of time. We determined agreement between self-reported and hospitalised stroke by calculating sensitivity, specificity and kappa statistics. We investigated whether characteristics including age, education, area of residence, country of birth, language spoken at home, recent mental health at survey completion and proxy completion of questionnaire were associated with disagreement, using logistic regression analysis to obtain odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Agreement between self-report and hospital-recorded stroke was fair in older women (kappa 0.35, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.46) and moderate in mid-aged women (0.56, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.75). There was a high proportion with unverified self-reported stroke, partly due to: reporting of transient ischaemic attacks; strokes occurring outside the period of interest; and possible reporting of stroke-like conditions. In the older cohort, a large proportion with unverified stroke had hospital records of other cerebrovascular disease. In both cohorts, higher education was associated with agreement, whereas recent poor mental health was associated with disagreement. Conclusion Among women who returned survey questionnaires within the period of interest, validity of self-reported stroke was fair to moderate, but is probably underestimated. Agreement between self-report and hospital-recorded stroke was associated with individual characteristics. Where clinically verified stroke data are unavailable, self-report may be a reasonable alternative method of stroke ascertainment for some epidemiological studies.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700