Harvesting Experiential Expertise to Support Safe Driving for People with Diabetes Mellitus

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Marika H. F. Burda MHSc (1)
  Frans van der Horst (1)
  Marjan van den Akker (1) (2)
  Alexander D. M. Stork (3)
  Ilse Mesters (4)
  Silvia Bours (1)
  Maarten Ploeg (5)
  Bjorn Winkens (6)
  Johannes A. Knottnerus (1)
  
• 刊名：The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：December 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：5
• 期：4
• 页码：251-264
• 全文大小：216 KB
• 参考文献：1. Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Kovatchev BP, et al. Self-treatment of hypoglycemia while driving. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2001; 54: 17-6 CrossRef
  2. Cox DJ, Kovatchev BP, Vandecar K, et al. Hypoglycemia preceding fatal car collisions. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 467- CrossRef
  3. Cox DJ, Ford D, Gonder-Frederick L, et al. Driving mishaps among individuals with type I diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 2177-0 CrossRef
  4. Health Council of the Netherlands. Medical fitness-to-drive of persons with diabetes [publication no. 15]. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands, 2002
  5. Stork ADM, van Haeften TW, Veneman TF. Diabetes and driving: desired data, research methods and their pitfalls, current knowledge, and future research. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1942- CrossRef
  6. Veneman TF. Diabetes mellitus and traffic incidents. Neth J Med 1996; 48(1): 24- CrossRef
  7. Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen. Regeling eisen geschiktheid 2000. Rijswijk: CBR, 2009
  8. Bernstein RK. Diabetes and driving. Diabetes Care 2006; 29(12): 2758 CrossRef
  9. Brady W, Kefer M. Hypoglycemia masquerading as head trauma. Am J Emerg Med 1994; 12: 383- CrossRef
  10. Rietjens T. Succesvol autorijden met diabetes mellitus type 1 [report]. Maastricht: Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, 2004
  11. Stork AD, van Haeften TW, Veneman TF. The decision not to drive during hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes according to hypoglycemia awareness. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 2822- CrossRef
  12. Van der Horst F, Bours S, van den Akker M, et al. Ervaringsdeskundigheid & ervaringsdeskundige: conceptualisering van de begrippen. Maastricht: Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, 2007
  13. Rietberg C, Mentink E, Verkuyl L. Inzet van ervaringsdeskundigheid bij de (re)integratie van arbeidsgehandicapten: marktverkennend onderzoek. Utrecht: Verwey-Jonker Instituut, 1998
  14. Burda MHF, Van der Horst F, Van den Akker M, et al. Identifying experiential expertise to support people with diabetes mellitus in applying for and participating effectively in paid work: a qualitative study. J Occup Environ Med 2012; 54: 92-00 CrossRef
  15. Fox NJ, Ward KJ, Rourke AJ. The ‘expert patient- empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 1299-09 CrossRef
  16. Wilson PM, Kendall S, Brooks F. The expert patients programme: a paradox of patient empowerment and medical dominance. Health Soc Care Community 2007; 15: 426-8 CrossRef
  17. Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JEW, Bunders JFG. The experiential expertise of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 2575-4 CrossRef
  18. Caron-Flinterman JF. A new voice in science: patient participation in decision-making on biomedical research [dissertation]. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 2005
  19. Elberse JE, Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JEW. Patient-expert partnerships in research: how to stimulate inclusion of patient perspectives. Health Expect 2010; 13: 160-3 CrossRef
  20. Van der Schaaf PS, Oderwald AK. Chronisch zieken over ervaringsdeskundigheid: een empirisch onderzoek naar de opvattingen over het begrip ervaringsdeskundigheid van chronisch zieken. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Metamedica, 1999
  21. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, 1990
  22. Maso I, Smaling A. Kwalitatief onderzoek: praktijk en theorie. Amsterdam: Boom, 1998
  23. Pawluch D, Neiterman E. What is grounded theory and where does it come from? In: Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, de Vries R, editors. Qualitative methods in health research. London: Sage Publications, 2010: 174-2
  24. Richards L. Using NVivo in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications, 1999
  25. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage Publications, 1985
  26. Siegel S, Castellan Jr NJ. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1988
  27. American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE). Guidelines for the practice of diabetes education. 2009 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.diabeteseducator.org [Accessed 2012 Jan 17]
  28. Kivits J. Researching the ‘informed patient- the case of online health information seekers. Inform Comm Soc 2004; 7: 510-0 CrossRef
  29. Armstrong N, Powel J. Patient perspectives on health advice posted on Internet discussion boards: a qualitative study. Health Expect 2009; 12: 313-0 CrossRef
  30. Hughes J, Wood E, Smith G. Exploring kidney patients-experiences of receiving individual peer support. Health Expect 2009; 12: 396-06 CrossRef
  31. Brownson CA, Heisler M. The role of peer support in diabetes care and self-management. Patient 2009; 2(1): 5-7 CrossRef
  32. Corser W, Lein C, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Contemporary adult diabetes mellitus management perceptions. Patient 2010; 3(2): 101-1 CrossRef
  33. Chalmers I. What do I want from health research and researchers when I am a patient. BMJ 1995; 310: 1315- CrossRef
  34. Popay J, Williams G. Public health research and lay knowledge. Soc Sci Med 1996; 42: 759-8 CrossRef
  35. Needham C. Realising the potential of co-production: negotiating improvements in public services. Soc Pol Society 2007; 7: 221-1
  36. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy 2002; 61: 213-6 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Marika H. F. Burda MHSc (1)
  Frans van der Horst (1)
  Marjan van den Akker (1) (2)
  Alexander D. M. Stork (3)
  Ilse Mesters (4)
  Silvia Bours (1)
  Maarten Ploeg (5)
  Bjorn Winkens (6)
  Johannes A. Knottnerus (1)
  
  1. Department of General Practice, Maastricht University/CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  2. Department of General Practice, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, St Anna Hospital, Geldrop, the Netherlands
  4. Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  5. Dutch Diabetes Association, DVN; Diabetesvereniging Nederland, Leusden, the Netherlands
  6. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University/CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  

文摘

Background Hypoglycemia is a frequent phenomenon in people being treated for diabetes mellitus, which can acutely disrupt driving performance. For the benefit of personal and public traffic safety, we decided to identify successful diabetes-related (SDR) behaviors to support safe driving for people with diabetes, from the perspective of experiential experts with diabetes mellitus. Experiential experts are people who can manage their own illness and conditions by developing expertise relevant to maintaining health and countering illness, and who are able to use this expertise to the benefit of peers. Objective The aim of our study was to objectify and systematize experiential expertise in terms of SDR behaviors, based on reports by experiential experts, to support safe driving for people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The emphasis was on preventing hypoglycemia as a short-term complication during driving. Methods We performed a mixed-methods study involving (i) semi-structured in-depth interviews with 33 experiential experts with diabetes mellitus from the Dutch Diabetes Association (DVN; Diabetesvereniging Nederland), in order to identify SDR behaviors regarding safe driving, and (ii) a validation study by means of a survey among a panel of 98 experiential experts (peers) from the DVN, to determine the extent to which they agreed with the communicability, importance, and feasibility of these behaviors for drivers with diabetes mellitus. Results We identified a comprehensive set of 11 SDR behaviors, differentiated into seven general and four specific behaviors, to support safe driving. The general behaviors concern the following topics: (i) acquiring knowledge and information; (ii) acquiring and using self-measuring of blood glucose (SMBG) equipment; (iii) knowing one’s physical response pattern; (iv) obtaining knowledge about the medication used; (v) preventing long-term eye complications; (vi) influencing factors that can affect blood glucose; and (vii) renewal procedure for driving license. The four specific behaviors refer to the following topics: (i) measures to be taken before driving; (ii) responding effectively to hypoglycemia while driving; (iii) informing and instructing passengers; and (iv) preventing hypoglycemia in drivers with type 2 diabetes mellitus not using SMBG equipment. Key factors for safe driving proved to be the ability of drivers to anticipate and respond effectively to hypoglycemia while driving and to inform and instruct fellow passengers. Participants of the validation survey agreed to a considerable degree with the communicability, importance, and feasibility of these behaviors to support safe driving for people with diabetes mellitus. Conclusions This study resulted in the identification and description of SDR behaviors to support safe driving. It proved possible to operationalize experiential expertise in terms of such behaviors. The next step is to have these behaviors validated by professional care providers in the field of diabetes, followed by translation into recommendations in self-management programs.