How do Service Providers and Clients Perceive Interorganizational Networks?

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jennifer Ihm ; Michelle Shumate…
• 关键词：Interorganizational networks ; Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) ; Development communication ; Organizational fields ; Cognitive social structures
• 刊名：Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：October 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：26
• 期：5
• 页码：1769-1785
• 全文大小：417 KB
• 参考文献：Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Griskevicius, V., et al. (2006). They all look the same to me (unless they’re angry) From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science, 17(10), 836-40.CrossRef
  Backer, T. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1993a). Introduction. In T. E. Backer & E. M. Rogers (Eds.), Organizational aspects of health communication campaigns: What works? (pp. 1-0). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  Backer, T. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1993b). Synthesis. In T. E. Backer & E. M. Rogers (Eds.), Organizational aspects of health communication campaigns: What works? (pp. 214-27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). “Coopetition-in business networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411-26.CrossRef
  Bennett, R. (2005). Competitive environment, market orientation, and the use of relational approaches to the marketing of charity beneficiary services. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(7), 453-69.CrossRef
  Bernard, H. R., & Killworth, P. D. (1977). Informant accuracy in social network data II. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 3-8.CrossRef
  Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., Kronenfeld, D., & Sailer, L. (1984). The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 495-17.CrossRef
  Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., & Sailer, L. (1982). Informant accuracy in social-network data V. An experimental attempt to predict actual communication from recall data. Social Science Research, 11(1), 30-6.CrossRef
  Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-013.CrossRef
  Brewer M. B. (2010). Intergroup relations. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1021-040). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  Chen, M. J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 100-34.
  CIA. (2012). CIA world factbook. Langley, VA: Central Intelligence Agency.
  Cooper, K., & Shumate, M. (2012). Interorganizational collaboration explored through the bona fide network perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 623-54.CrossRef
  D’aunno, T., Succi, M., & Alexander, J. A. (2000). The role of institutional and market forces in divergent organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 679-03.CrossRef
  DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-60.CrossRef
  Flora, J. A., Jatilus, D., Jackson, C., & Fortmann, S. P. (1993). The Stanford-five city heart disease prevention project. In T. E. Backer & E. M. Rogers (Eds.), Organizational aspects of health communication campaigns: What works? (pp. 101-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  Frumkin, P., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Institutional isomorphism and public sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 283-07.CrossRef
  Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-17.CrossRef
  Hugenberg, K., Miller, J., & Claypool, H. M. (2007). Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), 334-40.CrossRef
  Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychological Review, 117(4), 1168-187.CrossRef
  Kaminski, J. (2011). Cotton dependence in Burkina Faso: Constraints and opportunities for balanced growth. In P. Chuhan-Pole & M. Angwafo (Eds.), Yes Africa can: Success stories from a dynamic continent (pp. 107-24). Washington, DC: World Bank.
  Kaminski, J., Headey, D., & Bernard, T. (2011). The Burkinabè cotton story 1992-007: Sustainable success or Sub-Saharan mirage? World Development, 39(8), 1460-475.CrossRef
  Kaminski, J., & Thomas, A. (2011). Land use, production growth, and the institutional environment of smallholders: Evidence from Burkinabe cotton clients. Land Economics, 87(1), 161-82.CrossRef
  Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1(9), 36-1.
  Keast, R., Mandell, M. P., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64, 363-71.CrossRef
  Kenis, P., & Knoke, D. (2002). How organizational field networks
• 作者单位：Jennifer Ihm (1)
  Michelle Shumate (1)
  Julia Bello-Bravo (2)
  Yannick Atouba (3)
  Niango Malick Ba (4)
  Clémentine L. Dabire-Binso (5)
  Barry Robert Pittendrigh (2)
  
  1. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
  2. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
  3. University of Texas, El Paso, USA
  4. International Crop Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropic (ICRISAT), Niamey, Niger
  5. Laboratoire Central d’Entomologie Agricole de Kamboinsé, Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
  
• 刊物类别：Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
• 刊物主题：Social Sciences
  Social Sciences
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-7888

文摘

Interorganizational networks are important structures for both service providers, who must navigate them as part of their organizational roles, and clients, who use them for the purposes of receiving benefits. This research develops and tests a conceptual model that explains some of the differences in the ways that these two groups perceive these networks. Drawing on surveys/interviews with 200 clients and 63 service providers of agricultural development training in Burkina Faso, this research demonstrates that clients perceive interorganizational networks differently than service providers. In particular, these results demonstrate that service providers perceive more organizations in the network, more competitive and collaborative ties among those organizations, and more competitive ties per organization than clients. From these results, we draw implications for social network, development communication, and organizational fields-research. Keywords Interorganizational networks Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) Development communication Organizational fields Cognitive social structures