Empfehlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin zur strukturierten Patientenübergabe in der perioperativen Phase

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：V. von Dossow ; Prof. Dr. B. Zwissler
• 关键词：Perioperative Versorgung ; Interdisziplinäre Kommunikation ; Interprofessionelle Beziehungen ; Medizinische Fehler ; Patientensicherheit ; Perioperative care ; Interdisciplinary communication ; Interprofessional relations ; Medical errors ; Patient safety
• 刊名：Der Anaesthesist
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：February 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：65
• 期：2
• 页码：148-150
• 全文大小：400 KB
• 参考文献：1.Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ et al (2003) Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med 348:229–235CrossRef PubMed
  2.Randmaa M, Martensson G, Swenne CL et al (2014) SBAR improves communication and safety climate and decreases incident reports due to communication errors in an anesthetic clinic: a prospective intervention study. BMJ Open 4:1–8CrossRef
  3. www.​jointcommission.​org/​assets/​1/​6/​2007_​-Annual_​Report.​pdf
  4.van Rensen EL, Groen ES, Numan SC et al (2012) Multitasking during patient handover in the recovery room. Anesth Analg 115:1183–1187CrossRef PubMed
  5.Nagpal K, Vats A, Lamb B et al (2010) Information transfer and communication in surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 252:225–239CrossRef PubMed
  6.Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R et al (2014) Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med 371:1803–1812CrossRef PubMed
  7.Weinger MB, Slagle JM, Kuntz AH et al (2015) A multimodal intervention improves postanesthesia care unit handovers. Anesth Analg 121:957–971CrossRef PubMed
  8.Loeb RG, Sidney WA, Dekker MA (2015) Postanesthesia care handovers: context and controversy around communication and consistency. Anesth Analg 121:854–855CrossRef PubMed
  9.WHO Patient Safety Solutions. Volume 1, solution 3/May 2007. http://​www.​refworks.​com/​refgrabit/​rw2linkpage.​aspx . 2012
  10.De Meester K, Verspuy M, Monsieurs KG et al (2013) SBAR improves nurse-physician communication and reduces unexpected death: a pre and post intervention study. Resuscitation 84:1192–1196CrossRef PubMed
  11.Velji K, Baker GR, Fancott C et al (2008) Effectiveness of an adapted SBAR communication tool for a rehabilitation setting. Healthc Q 11:72–79CrossRef
  12.Segall N, Bonifacio AS, Schroeder RA et al (2012) Can we make postoperative patient handovers safer? A systematic review of the literature. Anesth Analg 115:102–105CrossRef PubMed
  
• 作者单位：V. von Dossow (1)
  Prof. Dr. B. Zwissler (1)
  
  1. Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
  
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  Anesthesiology
  Emergency Medicine
  Intensive and Critical Care Medicine
  Pain Medicine
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1432-055X

文摘

Teamwork in the operating room and in the intensive care unit necessitates clear and precise communication; however, interruptions in communication frequently occur, especially in the perioperative phase. Patient are particularly susceptible to deficits in communication due to higher stress peaks, simultaneous admission of several patients and concomitant treatment of emergency cases etc. The German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) therefore recommends the implementation of the so-called SBAR concept (S: „situation“, B: „background“, A: „assessment“, R: „recommendation“) for standardization of patient handover. This concept was originally developed for high-risk areas and organizations with the aim of guaranteeing a rapid, effective and consistent transfer of information. Keywords Perioperative care Interdisciplinary communication Interprofessional relations Medical errors Patient safety