Comparison of Partial Thickness and Full Thickness Tragal Cartilage Graft During Modified Cartilage Shield Tympanoplasty for Type I Procedures
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Sohil Vadiya ; Sushen Bhatt
- 关键词：Tympanoplasty ; Thickness of cartilage ; Modified cartilage shield ; Frequency wise hearing gain
- 刊名：Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：March 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：68
- 期：1
- 页码：30-33
- 全文大小：528 KB
- 参考文献：1.Aarnisalo AA, Cheng JT, Ravicz ME, Furlong C, Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ (2010) Motion of the tympanic membrane after cartilage tympanoplasty determined by stroboscopic holography. Hear Res 263(1–2):78–84. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.11.005 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
2.Milewski C (1993) Composite graft tympanoplasty in the treatment of ears with advanced middle ear pathology. Laryngoscope 103:1352–1356CrossRef PubMed
3.Amedee RG, Mann WJ, Rie-cheimann H (1989) Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty. Am J Otol 10:447–450PubMed
4.Cavaliere M, Mottola G, Rondinelli M, Iemma M (2009) Tragal cartilage in tympanoplasty: anatomic and functional results in 306 cases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 29(1):27–32PubMed PubMedCentral
5.Duckert LG, Müller J, Makielski KH, Helms J (1995) Composite autograft “shield” reconstruction of remnant tympanic membranes. Am J Otol 16(1):21–26PubMed
6.Kartush JM, Michaelides EM, Becvarovski Z, LaRouere MJ (2002) Over – under tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 112(5):802–807CrossRef PubMed
7.Jansen C (1963) Cartilagen—tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 73:1288–1302. doi:10.1288/00005537-196310000-00006 CrossRef PubMed
8.Mürbe D, Zahnert T, Bornitz M, Hüttenbrink K-B (2002) Acoustic properties of different cartilage reconstruction techniques of the tympanic membrane. Laryngoscope 112:1769–1776. doi:10.1097/00005537-200210000-00012 CrossRef PubMed
9.Mohamad SH, Khan I, Hussain SS (2012) Is cartilage tympanoplasty more effective than fascia tympanoplasty? A systematic review. Otol Neurotol 33(5):699–705. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318254fbc2 CrossRef PubMed
10.Nicholas BD, O’Reilly RC (2010) Is cartilage preferable to fascia myringoplasty in children? Laryngoscope 120(11):2136–2137. doi:10.1002/lary.21006 CrossRef PubMed
11.Lee CF, Chen JH, Chou YF, Hsu LP, Chen PR, Liu TC (2007) Optimal graft thickness for different sizes of tympanic membrane perforation in cartilage myringoplasty: a finite element analysis. Laryngoscope 117(4):725–730CrossRef PubMed
12.Yung M (2008) Cartilage tympanoplasty: literature review. J Laryngol Otol 122:663–672. doi:10.1017/S0022215108001813 CrossRef PubMed
13.Mukbel KM, Thabet ESM (2013) Repair of subtotal tympanic membrane perforation by ultrathin cartilage shield: evaluation of take rate and hearing result. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:33–36CrossRef - 作者单位：Sohil Vadiya (1)
Sushen Bhatt (1)
1. PramukhSwami Medical College and Shree Krishna Hospital, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India - 刊物主题：Otorhinolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery;
- 出版者：Springer India
- ISSN：0973-7707
文摘
To compare the results, in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement, of modified cartilage shield technique of tympanoplasty using either partial thickness tragal cartilage or full thickness tragal cartilage for type I procedures. 35 patients were included in group A where a partial thickness tragal cartilage was used and 27 patients included in group B where a full thickness tragal cartilage was used for modified cartilage shield tympanoplasty. Audiometry done at 4 months after surgery and the results compared. The graft take up rate for both these techniques is excellent. There had been no statistically significant difference in hearing gain between these two groups, except at 4,000 Hz, where hearing gain had been more in group A than group B with P value being 0.027. The modified cartilage shield tympanoplasty is a good technique for closure of tympanic membrane perforations. Hearing gain is very much similar between thin and thick cartilage groups, except at 4,000 Hz.