Age at diagnosis on prostate cancer survival undergoing androgen deprivation therapy as primary treatment in daily practice: results from Japanese observational cohort
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Teruo Inamoto (1)
    Haruhito Azuma (1)
    Shiro Hinotsu (2)
    Taiji Tsukamoto (3)
    Mototsugu Oya (4)
    Osamu Ogawa (5)
    Tadaichi Kitamura (6)
    Suzuki Kazuhiro (7)
    Seiji Naito (8)
    Mikio Namiki (9)
    Kazuo Nishimura (10)
    Yoshihiko Hirao (11)
    Michiyuki Usami (10)
    Masaru Murai (12)
    Hideyuki Akaza (13)
  • 关键词:Age at diagnosis ; CaP ; ADT
  • 刊名:Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
  • 出版年:2014
  • 出版时间:July 2014
  • 年:2014
  • 卷:140
  • 期:7
  • 页码:1197-1204
  • 全文大小:
  • 参考文献:1. Akaza H, Usami M, Hinotsu S, Ogawa O, Kagawa S, Kitamura T, Tsukamoto T, Naito S, Hirao Y, Murai M, Yamanaka H (2004) Characteristics of patients with prostate cancer who have initially been treated by hormone therapy in Japan: J-CaP surveillance. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34(6):329-36 CrossRef
    2. Akaza H, Hinotsu S, Usami M, Ogawa O, Kagawa S, Kitamura T, Tsukamoto T, Naito S, Hirao Y, Murai M, Yamanaka H, Namiki M (2006) The case for androgen deprivation as primary therapy for early stage disease: results from J-CaP and CaPSURE. J Urol 176(6 Pt 2):S47–S49 CrossRef
    3. Akaza H, Carroll P, Cooperberg MR, Hinotsu S (2012) Fifth joint meeting of J-CaP and CaPSURE: advancing the global understanding of prostate cancer and its management. Jpn J Clin Oncol 42(3):226-36 CrossRef
    4. Cooperberg MR, Hinotsu S, Namiki M, Ito K, Broering J, Carroll PR, Akaza H (2009) Risk assessment among prostate cancer patients receiving primary androgen deprivation therapy. J Clin Oncol 27(26):4306-313 CrossRef
    5. Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Carroll PR (2010) Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(7):1117-123 CrossRef
    6. Gomez SL, Noone AM, Lichtensztajn DY, Scoppa S, Gibson JT, Liu L, Morris C, Kwong S, Fish K, Wilkens LR, Goodman MT, Deapen D, Miller BA (2013) Cancer incidence trends among Asian American populations in the United States, 1990-008. J Natl Cancer Inst 105(15):1096-110 CrossRef
    7. Hinotsu S, Akaza H, Usami M, Ogawa O, Kagawa S, Kitamura T, Tsukamoto T, Naito S, Namiki M, Hirao Y, Murai M, Yamanaka H (2007) Current status of endocrine therapy for prostate cancer in Japan analysis of primary androgen deprivation therapy on the basis of data collected by J-CaP. Jpn J Clin Oncol 37(10):775-81 CrossRef
    8. Joseph SC, Delcastilo E, Loukas M, Osiro S (2014) Common cancers in centenarians. Med Sci Monit 20:18-3 CrossRef
    9. Loeb S, Carvalhal GF, Kan D, Desai A, Catalona WJ (2012) External validation of the cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA) score in a single-surgeon radical prostatectomy series. Urol Oncol 30(5):584-89
    10. Maldonado-Valadez R, Teber D, Erdogru T, Safi KC, Frede T, Rassweiler J (2006) The impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on the outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a matched pair analysis. J Urol 175(6):2092-096 CrossRef
    11. Nanda A, Chen MH, Moran BJ, Braccioforte MH, Dosoretz D, Salenius S, Katin M, Ross R, D’Amico AV (2014) Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy use and the risk of death in men with prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy who have no or at least a single risk factor for coronary artery disease. Eur Urol 65(1):177-85
    12. Oudard S, Banu E, Scotte F, Banu A, Medioni J, Beuzeboc P, Joly F, Ferrero JM, Goldwasser F, Andrieu JM (2007) Prostate-specific antigen doubling time before onset of chemotherapy as a predictor of survival for hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. Ann Oncol 18(11):1828-833 CrossRef
    13. Porten SP, Cooperberg MR, Konety BR, Carroll PR (2011) The example of CaPSURE: lessons learned from a national disease registry. World J Urol 29(3):265-71 CrossRef
    14. Richstone L, Bianco FJ, Shah HH, Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Scherr DS (2008) Radical prostatectomy in men aged > or =70?years: effect of age on upgrading, upstaging, and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogram. BJU Int 101(5):541-46 CrossRef
    15. Robbins AS, Koppie TM, Gomez SL, Parikh-Patel A, Mills PK (2007) Differences in prognostic factors and survival among white and Asian men with prostate cancer, California, 1995-004. Cancer 110(6):1255-263 CrossRef
    16. Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Lujan M, Lilja H, Zappa M, Denis LJ, Recker F, Berenguer A, Maattanen L, Bangma CH, Aus G, Villers A, Rebillard X, van der Kwast T, Blijenberg BG, Moss SM, de Koning HJ, Auvinen A (2009) Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 360(13):1320-328 CrossRef
    17. Shulman MJ, Benaim EA (2004) The natural history of androgen independent prostate cancer. J Urol 172(1):141-45 CrossRef
    18. Smaldone MC, Cowan JE, Carroll PR, Davies BJ (2010) Eligibility for active surveillance and pathological outcomes for men undergoing radical prostatectomy in a large, community based cohort. J Urol 183(1):138-43 CrossRef
    19. Stewart AJ, Scher HI, Chen MH, McLeod DG, Carroll PR, Moul JW, D’Amico AV (2005) Prostate-specific antigen nadir and cancer-specific mortality following hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen failure. J Clin Oncol 23(27):6556-560 CrossRef
    20. Wasson JH, Cushman CC, Bruskewitz RC, Littenberg B, Mulley AG Jr, Wennberg JE (1993) A structured literature review of treatment for localized prostate cancer. Prostate Disease Patient Outcome Research Team. Arch Fam Med 2(5):487-93 CrossRef
    21. Yu B (2013) Predicting county-level cancer incidence rates and counts in the USA. Stat Med 32(22):3911-925 CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Teruo Inamoto (1)
    Haruhito Azuma (1)
    Shiro Hinotsu (2)
    Taiji Tsukamoto (3)
    Mototsugu Oya (4)
    Osamu Ogawa (5)
    Tadaichi Kitamura (6)
    Suzuki Kazuhiro (7)
    Seiji Naito (8)
    Mikio Namiki (9)
    Kazuo Nishimura (10)
    Yoshihiko Hirao (11)
    Michiyuki Usami (10)
    Masaru Murai (12)
    Hideyuki Akaza (13)

    1. Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
    2. Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
    3. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
    4. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
    5. Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    6. Asoka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
    7. Department of Urology, Gunma University School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
    8. Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Kyushu, Japan
    9. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
    10. Department of Urology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
    11. Osaka Gyomeikan Hospital, Osaka, Japan
    12. The International Goodwill Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
    13. Department of Strategic Investigation on Comprehensive Cancer Network, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • ISSN:1432-1335
文摘
Objectives Primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) had been used extensively in Japan than in the USA and European countries regardless of the disease risk or patient’s age. To illustrate the consequence of PADT from daily clinical practice, we evaluated the relationship among age, disease risk, and survival of patients with prostate cancer treated by PADT in largest Asian cohort. Patients and methods The 19,246 men subjected to PADT enrolled in the Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer were enrolled for the present analysis. Patients were divided into four groups based on age at diagnosis: age <66, 66-0, 71-5, and >75. Risk was stratified according to the Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (J-CAPRA). Multivariate competing risks regression analysis was performed for OS and PFS. Results There was downward stage migration over age. Among men aged >75?years, 34.1?% had nodal or distant metastatic disease. In contrast, 56.0?% of patients aged <66?years presented with advanced disease. The modality of hormonal therapy varied with age across risk groups; the younger age group showed a higher proportion of maximal androgen blockade, while the proportion of monotherapy use was higher in older men. The likelihood of low-risk disease by J-CAPRA classification increased significantly with increasing age (p?<?0.0001 by Pearson’s chi-square test). The same as OS, the PFS rate increased with age until after the age of 75. Men aged 71-5 had better survival rates even after adjustments for treatment modality alone, or for treatment modality plus disease risk. Conclusions Age cohorts do affect orientation toward favorable disease course after PADT with men aged 71-5 being benefiting more from PADT than other age groups.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700