Biceps tenodesis (long head): arthroscopic keyhole technique versus arthroscopic interference screw: a prospective comparative clinical and radiographic marker study
刊名:European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
出版年:2016
出版时间:January 2016
年:2016
卷:26
期:1
页码:77-84
全文大小:880 KB
参考文献:1.Boileau P, Ahrens P-M, Trojani C, Coste JS, Cordéro B, Rousseau P (2003) Entrapment of the long head of the biceps: the “hourglass biceps”. Another cause of pain and locking of the shoulder. Rev Chir Orthop 89(8):672–682PubMed 2.Boileau P, Baque F, Valerio L, Ahrens P, Chuinard C, Trojani C (2007) Isolated arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis improves symptoms in patients with massive irreparable cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 89:747–757. doi:10.2106/jbjs.e.01097 CrossRef 3.Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Nové-Josserand L, Neyton L, Szabo I (2005) Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:238–246. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.07.008 PubMed CrossRef 4.Kelly AM, Drakos MC, Fealy S, Taylor SA, O’Brien SJ (2005) Arthroscopic release of the long head of the biceps tendon: functional outcome and clinical results. Am J Sports Med 33:208–213. doi:10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00508-5 PubMed CrossRef 5.Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Coste JS, Walch G (2002) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: a new technique using bio-absorbable interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 18:1002–1012. doi:10.1053/jars.2002.36488 PubMed CrossRef 6.Gartsman GM, Hammerman SM (2000) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: operative technique. Arthroscopy 16:550–552. doi:10.1053/jars.2000.4386 PubMed CrossRef 7.Richards DP, Burkhart SS, Lo IKY (2003) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation: the lateral decubitus position. Oper Tech Sports Med 11:15–23. doi:10.1053/otsm.2003.35893 CrossRef 8.Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Santangelo S, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2005) The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 21:1296–1306. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.008 PubMed CrossRef 9.Ozalay M, Akpinar S, Karaeminogullari O, Balcik C, Tasci A, Tandogan RN et al (2005) Mechanical strength of four different biceps tenodesis techniques. Arthroscopy 21:992–998. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.002 PubMed CrossRef 10.Lo IKY, Burkhart SS (2004) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using a bioabsorbable interference screw. Arthroscopy 20:85–95. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.017 PubMed CrossRef 11.Froimson AI, Oh I (1975) Keyhole tenodesis of biceps origin at the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 112:245–249PubMed 12.Amaravati RS, Kany J, Guinand R, Saji MJ, Sekaran P (2011) Preliminary result of arthroscopic keyhole biceps tenodesis: a novel technique. Tech Shoulder Surg 12:25–31. doi:10.1097/bte.0b013e3182116be8 CrossRef 13.Amaravathi RS, Pankappilly B, Kany J (2011) Arthroscopic keyhole proximal biceps tenodesis: a technical note. J Orthop Surg 19:379–383 14.Kany J, Guinand R, Amaravathi RS, Alassaf I (2015) The keyhole technique for arthroscopic tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon. In vivo prospective study with a radio-opaque marker. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:31–34. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2014.10.016 PubMed CrossRef 15.Romeo AA, Mazzocca AD, Tauro JC (2004) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 20:206–213. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.033 PubMed CrossRef 16.Kilicoglu O, Koyuncu O, Demirhan M, Esenyel CZ, Atalar AC, Ozsoy S et al (2005) Time-dependent changes in failure loads of 3 biceps tenodesis techniques: in vivo study in a sheep model. Am J Sports Med 33:1536–1544. doi:10.1177/0363546505274716 PubMed CrossRef 17.Gombera MM, Kahlenberg CA, Nair R, Saltzman MD, Terry MA (2015) All-arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546515570024 PubMed 18.Hsu AR, Ghodadra NS, Provencher MT, Lewis PB, Bach BR (2011) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:326–332. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.019 PubMed CrossRef 19.Lee HI, Shon MS, KohKH Lim TK, Heo J, Yoo JC (2014) Clinical and radiologic results of arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with suture anchor in the setting of rotator cuff tear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:e53–e60. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.06.004 PubMed CrossRef 20.Gregory JM, Harwood DP, Gochanour E, Sherman SL, Romeo AA (2012) Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis. Int J Shoulder Surg 6:45–50. doi:10.4103/0973-6042.96993 PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef 21.Lafosse L, Van Raebroeckx A, Brzoska R (2006) A new technique to improve tissue grip: “The Lasso-Loop Stitch”. Arthroscopy 22:1246.e1–1246.e3. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.021 22.Mazzocca AD, Cote MP, Arciero CL, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2008) Clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw. Am J Sports Med 36:1922–1929. doi:10.1177/0363546508318192 PubMed CrossRef 23.Sears BW, Spencer EE, Getz CL (2011) Humeral fracture following subpectoral biceps tenodesis in 2 active, healthy patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:e7–e11. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.02.020 PubMed CrossRef 24.Koch BS, Burks RT (2012) Failure of biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 28:735–740. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.019 PubMed CrossRef 25.Bradbury T, Dunn WR, Kuhn JE (2008) Preventing the Popeye deformity after release of the long head of the biceps tendon: an alternative technique and biomechanical evaluation. Arthroscopy 24:1099–1102. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.06.002 PubMed CrossRef 26.Narvani AA, Atoun E, Van Tongel A, Sforza G, Levy O (2013) The “anchor shape” technique for long head of the biceps tenotomy to avoid the popeye deformity. Arthrosc Tech 2:e167–e170. doi:10.1016/j.eats.01.008 PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef 27.Sekiya JK, Elkousy HA, Rodosky MW (2003) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using the percutaneous intra-articular transtendon technique. Arthroscopy 19:1137–1141. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.022 PubMed CrossRef 28.Hedtmann A, Fett H, Heers G (2002) Läsionen im bereich des rotatore intervalls und der langen bizepssehne. In: Gohlke F, Hedtmann A (eds) Schulter: das Standardwerk für klinik und praxis. Georg thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 310–316
1. Clinique de l’Union, Boulevard de Ratalens, 31240, Saint Jean, France 2. St John’s Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India 3. Sparsh Hospital for Advanced Surgeries, Bangalore, India
刊物类别:Medicine
刊物主题:Medicine & Public Health Surgical Orthopedics Traumatic Surgery
出版者:Springer Paris
ISSN:1432-1068
文摘
Purpose The long head biceps tenodesis (LHBT) is an alternative to tenotomy in order to prevent Popeye sign. Biomechanical studies showed that interference screw (IFS) was the strongest fixation but there might be complications and cost. What’s more, the analyses of tenodesis failures are undervalued because they only take visible deformations of the arm into account. The purpose of this study was to compare a modified arthroscopic “keyhole” LHBT (modified @KH) with an arthroscopic IFS LHBT (@IFS) using an objective method. We hypothesized that modified @KH gave similar clinical outcomes as @IFS without its hassles or drawbacks.