Nested patterns in urban butterfly species assemblages: respective roles of plot management, park layout and landscape features

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Marie-Hélène Lizee ; Thierry Tatoni ; Magali Deschamps-Cottin
• 关键词：Rhopalocera ; Functional traits ; Redundancy analysis ; SLOSS ; Metacommunity
• 刊名：Urban Ecosystems
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：March 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：19
• 期：1
• 页码：205-224
• 全文大小：1,213 KB
• 参考文献：Akaike H (1978) A Bayesian analysis of the minimum AIC procedure. Ann Inst Stat Math 30:9–14CrossRef
  Almeida-Neto M, Ulrich W (2011) A straightforward computational approach for quantifying nestedness using abundance data. Environ Model Softw 26:173–178CrossRef
  Almeida-Neto M, Guimarães P, Guimarães PR Jr, Loyola RD, Ulrich W (2008) A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and quantification. Oikos 117:1227–1239CrossRef
  Anderson WB, Wait DA (2001) Subsidized island biogeography: another new twist on an old theory. Ecol Lett 4:289–291CrossRef
  Atmar W, Patterson BD (1993) The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96:373–382CrossRef
  Barbaro L, Van Halder I (2009) Linking bird, carabid beetle and butterfly life- history traits to habitat fragmentation in mosaic landscapes. Ecography 32:321–333CrossRef
  Bastin L, Thomas CD (1999) The distribution of plant species in urban vegetation fragments. Landsc Ecol 14:493–507CrossRef
  Berglund H, Jonsson BG (2003) Nested plant and fungal communities; the importance of area and habitat quality in maximizing species capture in boreal old-growth forests. Biol Conserv 112:319–328CrossRef
  Blair RB, Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol Conserv 80:113–125CrossRef
  Boecklen WJ (1997) Nestedness, biogeographic theory, and the design of nature reserves. Oecologia 112:123–142CrossRef
  Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055CrossRef
  Brown KSJ (1991) Conservation of insects and their habitats: insects as indicators. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic, London, pp 449–504
  Brualdi RA, Sanderson JG (1999) Nested species subsets, gaps, and discrepancy. Oecologia 119:256–264CrossRef
  Brückmann SV, Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I (2010) Butterfly and plant specialists suffer from reduced connectivity in fragmented landscapes. J Appl Ecol 47:799–809CrossRef
  Bruun HH, Moen J (2003) Nested communities of alpine plants on isolated mountains: relative importance of colonization and extinction. J Biogeogr 30:297–303CrossRef
  Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Grove JM (2006) Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: heterogeneity, connectivity, and history. Ecol Complex 3:1–12CrossRef
  Campbell RE (2010) Spatial pattern and community assembly: does the configuration of stream networks influence their community structure? Ph.D thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
  Chiari C, Dinetti M, Licciardello C, Licitra G, Pautasso M (2010) Urbanization and the more-individuals hypothesis. J Anim Ecol 79:366–371CrossRef PubMed
  Cornelis J, Hermy M (2004) Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landsc Urban Plan 69:385–401CrossRef
  Croci S, Butet A, Georges A, Aguejdad R, Clergeau P (2008) Small urban woodlands as biodiversity conservation hot-spot: a multi-taxon approach. Landsc Ecol 23:1171–1186CrossRef
  Cutler AH (1994) Nested biotas and biological conservation: metrics, mechanisms, and meaning of nestedness. Landsc Urban Plan 28:73–82CrossRef
  Darlington PJ (1957) Zoogeography: the geographical distribution of animals. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York and London
  Dearborn DC, Kark S (2010) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24(2):432–40CrossRef PubMed
  R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://​www.​r-project.​org . Accessed 1 Oct 2014
  Driscoll DA (2008) The frequency of metapopulations, metacommunities and nestedness in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 117:297–309CrossRef
  Erhardt A (1985) Diurnal lepidoptera: sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. J Appl Ecol 22:849–861CrossRef
  Ericson L, Hansson L, Larsson TB, Rasmusson G (1988) The importance of residual biotopes for fauna and flora. In: Schreiber KF (ed.) Connectivity in landscape ecology. Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar of IALE, Münster, pp 105–106
  Fernández-Juricic E (2002) Can human disturbance promote nestedness? A case study with birds in an urban fragmented landscape. Oecologia 131:269–278CrossRef
  Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2002) Treating the nestedness temperature calculator as a 'black box' can lead to false conclusions. Oikos 99:193–199
  Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2005) Nestedness in fragmented landscapes: a case study on birds, arboreal marsupials and lizards. J Biogeogr 32:1737–1750CrossRef
  Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:265–280
  Graves SD, Shapiro AM (2003) Exotics as host plants of the California butterfly fauna. Biol Conserv 110:413–433CrossRef
  Heger T, Trepl L (2003) Predicting biological invasions. Biol Invasions 5:313–321CrossRef
  Heikkinen RK, Miska L, Kuussaari M, Pöyry J (2005) New insights into butterfly–environment relationships using partitioning methods. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:2203–2210CrossRef
  Home R, Bauer N, Hunziker M (2010) Cultural and biological determinants in the evaluation of urban green spaces. Environ Behav 42(4):494–523CrossRef
  Hortal J, Triantis KA, Meiri S, Thébault E, Sfenthourakis S (2009) Island species richness increases with habitat diversity. Am Nat 174(6):E205–E217CrossRef PubMed
  Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
  Hulten E (1937) Outline of the history of arctic and boreal biota during the quaternary period. Bokförlags aktiebolaget Thule, Stockholm
  IGN (2004) Base de données CARTO - Bouches-du-Rhône. Institut Géographique National
  IGN (2006) Base de données 1000 - Marseille. Institut Géographique National
  Ims RA (1995) Movement patterns related to spatial structures. In: Hansson L, Fahrig L, Merriam G (eds) Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 85–10CrossRef
  Janz N (2005) The relationship between habitat selection and preference for adult and larval food resources in the polyphagous butterfly Vanessa cardui (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J Insect Behav 18:767–780CrossRef
  Janz N, Bergstrom A, Sjogren A (2005) The role of nectar sources for oviposition decisions of the common blue butterfly polyommatus Icarus. Oikos 109:535–538CrossRef
  Joffre R, Rambal S, Damesin C (2007) Functional attributes in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladares F (eds) Functional plant ecology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, New York, pp 285–312
  Kitahara M, Fujii K (1994) Biodiversity and community structure of temperate butterfly species within a gradient of human disturbance: an analysis based on the concept of generalist vs. specialist strategies. Res Popul Ecol 36:187–199CrossRef
  Kitahara M, Fujii K (1997) An island biogeographical approach to the analysis of butterfly community patterns in newly designed parks. Res Popul Ecol 39:23–35CrossRef
  Lafranchis T (2000) Les Papillons de jour de France, Belgique et Luxembourg et leurs chenilles. Biotope, Mèze (France)
  Laurance WF (1991) Ecological correlates of extinction processes in Australian tropical rainforest mammals. Conserv Biol 5:79–89CrossRef
  Laurance WF (2008) Theory meets reality: how habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory. Biol Conserv 141:1731–1744CrossRef
  Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2 Englishth edn. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam
  Leibold MA (1998) Similarity and local co-existence of species in regional biotas. Evol Ecol 12:95–110CrossRef
  Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase J, Hoopes M, Holt R, Shurin J, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613CrossRef
  Levins R, Culver D (1971) Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 68:1246–1248CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  Lizée MH, Mauffrey JF, Tatoni T, Deschamps-Cottin M (2011) Monitoring urban environments on the basis of biological traits. Ecol Indic 11:353–361CrossRef
  Lizée MH, Manel S, Mauffrey JF, Tatoni T, Deschamps-Cottin M (2012) Matrix configuration and patch isolation influences override the species-area relationship for urban butterfly communities. Landsc Ecol 27:159–169CrossRef
  Loertscher M, Erhardt A, Zettel J (1995) Microdistribution of butterflies in a mosaic-like habitat: the role of nectar sources. Ecography 18:15–26CrossRef
  Logue JB, Mouquet N, Peter H, Hillebrand H, The Metacommunity Working Group (2011) Empirical approaches to metacommunities: a review and comparison with theory. Trends Ecol Evol 26:482–491CrossRef PubMed
  Lomolino MV (2000) Ecology’s most general, yet protean pattern: the species-area relationship. J Biogeogr 27:17–26CrossRef
  Lundholm JT (2006) How novel are urban ecosystems? Trends Ecol Evol 21:659–660CrossRef PubMed
  Matteson KC, Langellotto GA (2010) Determinates of inner city butterfly and bee species richness. Urban Ecosyst 13:333–347CrossRef
  Mcdonald RI, Kareiva P, Forman RTT (2008) The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 141:1695–1703CrossRef
  McFrederick Q, LeBuhn G (2006) Are urban parks refuges for bumble bees Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae)? Biol Conserv 129:372–382CrossRef
  McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890CrossRef
  Mouquet N, Loreau M (2003) Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat 162:544–557CrossRef PubMed
  Murphy DD, Menninger MS, Ehrlich PR (1984) Nectar source distribution as a determinant of oviposition host species in euphydryas chalcedona. Oecologia 56:269–271CrossRef
  Niell RS, Brussard PF, Murphy DD (2007) Butterfly community composition and oak woodland vegetation response to rural residential development. Landsc Urban Plan 81:235–245CrossRef
  Nielsen AB, van den Bosch M, Maruthaveeran S, van den Bosch CK (2014) Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosyst 17:305–327CrossRef
  Niemelä J, Kotze DJ, Venn S, Penev L, Stoyanov I, Spence J, Hartley D, de Oac EM (2002) Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban–rural gradients: an international comparison. Landsc Ecol 17:387–401CrossRef
  Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2010) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.17. http://​CRAN.​R-project.​org/​package=​vegan . Accessed 1 Oct 2014
  Patterson BD (1987) The principle of nested subsets and its implications for biological conservation. Conserv Biol 1:323–334CrossRef
  Patterson BD, Atmar W (1986) Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagoes. Biol J Linn Soc 28:65–82CrossRef
  Patterson BD, Atmar W (2000) Analyzing species composition in fragments. In: Rheinwald G (ed) Isolated vertebrate communities in the tropics, Proc 4th Int Symp, vol 46. Bonner Zoologische Monographen, Germany, pp 9–24
  Peres-Neto P, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87:2614–2625CrossRef PubMed
  Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157CrossRef
  Presley SJ, Higgins CL, Willig MR (2010) A comprehensive framework for the evaluation of metacommunity structure. Oikos 119:908–917CrossRef
  Rudd H, Vala J, Schaefer V (2002) Importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy: a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces. Restor Ecol 10:368–375CrossRef
  Sanford MP, Manley NP, Murphy DD (2009) Effects of urban development on ant communities: implications for ecosystem services and management. Conserv Biol 23:131–141CrossRef PubMed
  Santin A (2004) Répertoire des plantes-hôtes et de substitution des chenilles du monde, Tomes 1 & 2. OPIE (Office Pour les Insectes et leur Environnement), Guyancourt, France
  Schleicher A (2010) Spatio-temporally explicit incidence analysis of plant functional groups in metacommunities. Ph.D thesis, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany
  Simberloff DS, Wilson EO (1969) Experimental zoogeography of islands: the colonization of empty islands. Ecology 50:278–296CrossRef
  Smith RM, Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K (2006) Urban domestic gardens (VIII): environmental correlates of invertebrate abundance. Biodivers Conserv 15:2515–2545CrossRef
  Snep RPH, Opdam PFM, Baveco JM, WallisDeVries MF, Timmermans W, Kwak RGM, Kuypers V (2006) How peri-urban areas can strengthen animal populations within cities: a modeling approach. Biol Conserv 127:345–355CrossRef
  Stevens VM, Turlure C, Baguette M (2010) A meta-analysis of dispersal in butterflies. Biol Rev 85(3):625–642PubMed
  Tammaru T, Haukioja E (1996) Capital breeders and income breeders among Lepidoptera - consequences to population dynamics. Oikos 77:561–564CrossRef
  Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:1791–1796CrossRef
  Tolman T, Lewington R (1999) Guide des papillons d’Europe et d’Afrique du Nord. Delachaux & Niestlé, Lausanne (Switzerland)
  Triantis KA, Vardinoyannis K, Tsolaki EP, Botsaris I, Lika K, Mylonas M (2006) Re-approaching the small island effect. J Biogeogr 33:914–923CrossRef
  Ulrich W (2009) Nestedness analysis as a tool to identify ecological gradients. Ecol Quest 11:27–34CrossRef
  Ulrich W, Gotelli NJ (2007) Null model analysis of species nestedness patterns. Ecology 88:1824–1831CrossRef PubMed
  Ulrich W, Almeida-Neto M, Gotelli NG (2009) A consumer’s guide to nestedness analysis. Oikos 118:3–17CrossRef
  Urban MC (2004) Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure. Ecology 85(11):2971–2978CrossRef
  Wang GM, Jiang GM, Zhou YL, Liu QR, Ji YS, Wang SX, Chen SB, Liu H (2007) Biodiversity conservation in a fast-growing metropolitan area in China: a case study of plant diversity in Beijing. Biodivers Conserv 16:4025–4038CrossRef
  Wiklund C (1977) Oviposition, feeding and spatial separation of breeding and foraging habitats in a population of leptidea sinapis (Lepidoptera). Oikos 28:56–68CrossRef
  Wiklund C, Karlsson B, Leimar O (2001) Sexual conflict and cooperation in butterfly reproduction: a comparative study on polyandry and female fitness. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:1661–1667CrossRef
  Worthen WB, Jones MT, Jetton RM (1998) Community structure and environmental stress: desiccation promotes nestedness in mycophagous fly communities. Oikos 81:45–54CrossRef
  Wright DH, Patterson BD, Mikkelson GM, Cutler A, Atmar W (1998) A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oecologia 113:1–20CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Marie-Hélène Lizee (1) (2)
  Thierry Tatoni (1)
  Magali Deschamps-Cottin (2)
  
  1. Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d’Écologie marine et continentale (IMBE), Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Avignon Université, IMBE UMR 7263, 13397, Marseille, France
  2. Laboratoire Population Environnement Développement (LPED), Aix Marseille Université, IRD, LPED UMR_D 151, 13331, Marseille, France
  
• 刊物类别：Biomedical and Life Sciences
• 刊物主题：Life Sciences
  Ecology
  Environmental Management
  Nature Conservation
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-1642

文摘

Increasing numbers of cities are currently developing sustainable policies aimed at promoting urban biodiversity and ecological dynamics through the planning of green networks and the implementation of more sustainable management practices. These human activities can strongly influence environmental factors on which the organization of ecological communities at different scales depends. Thus, it is of fundamental importance to understand the relative impact of local management, green space design and landscape features on the distribution and the abundance of species in urban areas. On the basis of 2 years of butterfly surveys in urban public parks within an extensive Mediterranean metropolitan area, Marseille (South-East France), the aim of this paper is to provide a better understanding of the effect of these three environmental scales (plot, park, landscape) on the composition and organization of species assemblages. Using variation partitioning and nestedness analysis on ecological data aggregated at plot-level and park-level respectively, we demonstrate the preponderant effect of landscape scale features on urban butterfly assemblages. Our results also highlight an important co-variation of plot management, park layout and urban landscape features, in their interaction with the community structure of urban butterflies. Although there is no significant species-area relationship, significantly nested patterns arise in species composition. Selective colonization appears as a driving force constraining the constitution of species assemblages within the city. However, a prospective study on adjacent more natural areas suggests that biotic limitations, interspecific competition and habitat filtering may play an important role if a larger portion of the urbanization gradient is explored, which remains to be investigated.