Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Tomoaki Yatabe (1)
  Hiroyuki Kitagawa (2)
  Koichi Yamashita (1)
  Kazuhiro Hanazaki (2)
  Masataka Yokoyama (1)
  
• 关键词：Esophagectomy ; Prone position ; Outcome
• 刊名：Surgery Today
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：April 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：43
• 期：4
• 页码：386-391
• 全文大小：176KB
• 参考文献：1. Chang AC, Lee JS. Resection for esophageal cancer in the elderly. Thorac Surg Clin. 2009;19:333-3. CrossRef
  2. Ng JM. Update on anesthetic management for esophagectomy. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2011;24:37-3. CrossRef
  3. Kitagawa H, Akimori T, Okabayashi T, Namikawa T, Sugimoto T, Kobayashi M, et al. Total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394:617-1. CrossRef
  4. McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Ramsay G, Sunderland G, Baxter JN, Anderson JR, et al. Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and pulmonary function. Surgery. 1994;115:533-.
  5. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Okeson GC, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A comparison of postoperative pulmonary function. Ann Surg. 1991;213:651-. CrossRef
  6. Coelho JC, de Araujo RP, Marchesini JB, Coelho IC, de Araujo LR. Pulmonary function after cholecystectomy performed through Kocher’s incision, a mini-incision, and laparoscopy. World J Surg. 1993;17:544-. CrossRef
  7. Choi YS, Shim JK, Na S, Hong SB, Hong YW, Oh YJ. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2286-1. CrossRef
  8. Dapri G, Himpens J, Cadiere GB. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer:laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy? Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1060-. CrossRef
  9. Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, Akimori T, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M. Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning. J Anesth. 2010;24:803-. CrossRef
  10. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:466-7. CrossRef
  11. Mohn AC, Bernardshaw SV, Ristesund SM, Hovde Hansen PE, R?kke O. Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery. Results from a prospective observational two-centre study. Scand J Surg. 2009;98:155-.
  12. Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, Strik C, Groenewoud JJ, Brinkert W, van Laarhoven CJ, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus conventional postoperative care in colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:88-5. CrossRef
  13. Stoot JH, van Dam RM, Busch OR, van Hillegersberg R, De Boer M, Olde Damink SW, et al. The effect of a multimodal fast-track programme on outcomes in laparoscopic liver surgery: a multicentre pilot study. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11:140-. CrossRef
  14. Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. 10th edition. Tokyo: Japan Esophageal Society, Kanehara, Co., Ltd. 2008.
  15. Nomori H, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K. What is the advantage of a thoracoscopic lobectomy over a limited thoracotomy procedure for lung cancer surgery? Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:879-4. CrossRef
  16. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position-experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:7-6. CrossRef
  17. Maessen J, Dejong CHC, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2007;94:224-1. CrossRef
  18. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;238:486-5.
  19. Petri R, Zuccolo M, Brizzolari M, Rossit L, Rosignoli A, Durastante V, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for esophageal cancer with the patient in prone position. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1102-7.
  20. Hoppo T, Jobe BA, Hunter JG. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: the evolution and technique of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2011;35:1454-3. CrossRef
  21. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662-. CrossRef
  22. Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Garcia JR, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C, et al. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg. 2011;11:2. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Tomoaki Yatabe (1)
  Hiroyuki Kitagawa (2)
  Koichi Yamashita (1)
  Kazuhiro Hanazaki (2)
  Masataka Yokoyama (1)
  
  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan
  2. Department of Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Kohasu Oko-cho, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan
  
• ISSN：1436-2813

文摘

Purpose Traditional esophagectomy is a highly invasive procedure. Intrathoracic procedures in esophagectomy can be performed by thoracoscopy. This study compared the influence of prone positioning with that of lateral decubitus positioning on patient outcomes following esophagectomy. Methods This study enrolled 24 patients that underwent esophagectomy with thoracoscopy in the prone position between July 2009 and November 2010 (group P) and 24 patients that underwent thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position between July 2007 and June 2009 (group L). The ICU and hospital stay length, pulmonary complication frequency and time until walking ability was regained were recorded. Results The patients-background was not significantly different. Total blood loss and pulmonary complication frequency were significantly lower in group P than in group L [209 (SD; 146) vs. 474 (279) ml, P?=?0.002, and 4 vs. 38?%, P?=?0.003]. The duration of ICU stay, time until walking ability was regained and hospital stay were significantly shorter in group P than in group L [865 (103) vs. 1349 (702) min, P?=?0.002, 1.0 (0.2) vs. 3.1 (2.5) POD, P?<?0.001 and 23 (16) vs. 35 (15) POD, P?=?0.009]. Conclusion Thoracoscopic surgery in the prone position allows for earlier mobilization and also reduces respiratory complications.