Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jawdat Abdulla (14) jawab@dadlnet.dk
  Kasper S. Pedersen (1)
  Matthew Budoff (2)
  Klaus F. Kofoed (3)
• 关键词：Computed tomography &#8211 ; Angiography &#8211 ; Calcium score &#8211 ; Coronary artery disease
• 刊名：The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging (formerly Cardiac Imaging)
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：April 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：28
• 期：4
• 页码：943-953
• 全文大小：322.0 KB
• 参考文献：1. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F, Burgstahler C, Cademartiri F, de Feyter P, George R, Kaufmann P, Kopp AF, Knuuti J, Ropers D, Schuijf J, Tops LF, Bax JJ (2008) Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 29:531–556
  2. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C (2007) 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 28:3042–3050
  3. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832
  4. Rosen BD, Fernandes V, McClelland RL, Carr JJ, Detrano R, Bluemke DA, Lima JA (2009) Relationship between baseline coronary calcium score and demonstration of coronary artery stenoses during follow-up MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:1175–1183
  5. Ho JS, FitzGerald SJ, Stolfus LL, Wade WA, Reinhardt DB, Barlow CE, Cannaday JJ (2008) Relation of a coronary artery calcium score higher than 400 to coronary stenoses detected using multidetector computed tomography and to traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Am J Cardiol 101:1444–1447
  6. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557
  7. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, Runza G, McFadden EP, Baks T, Serruys PW, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323
  8. Leber AW, Knez A, von ZF, Becker A, Nikolaou K, Paul S, Wintersperger B, Reiser M, Becker CR, Steinbeck G, Boekstegers P (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154
  9. Meng L, Cui L, Cheng Y, Wu X, Tang Y, Wang Y, Xu F (2009) Effect of heart rate and coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of the dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Korean J Radiol 10:347–354
  10. Palumbo AA, Maffei E, Martini C, Tarantini G, Di Tanna GL, Berti E, Grilli R, Casolo G, Brambilla V, Cerrato M, Rotondo A, Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Cademartiri F (2009) Coronary calcium score as gatekeeper for 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with chest pain per-segment and per-patient analysis. Eur Radiol 19:2127–2135
  11. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Leschka S, Plass A, Baumuller S, Marincek B, Alkadhi H (2008) Influence of calcifications on diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1684–1689
  12. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Owens PE, Marshall AJ (2005) Highly accurate coronary angiography with submillimetre, 16-slice computed tomography. Heart 91:308–313
  13. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, Stolzmann P, Plass A, Goerres GW, Luescher TF, Genoni M, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, Leschka S (2008) Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 29:766–776
  14. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, Chan WL, Seyfarth MT, Liew HB, Rapaee A, Fong YY, Ang CK, Sim KH (2006) Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. Am Heart J 151:1323–1326
  15. Heuschmid M, Kuettner A, Schroeder S, Trabold T, Feyer A, Seemann MD, Kuzo R, Claussen CD, Kopp AF (2005) ECG-gated 16-MDCT of the coronary arteries assessment of image quality and accuracy in detecting stenoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1413–1419
  16. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, Scherer M, Bellinger R, Martin A, Benton R, Delago A, Min JK (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–1732
  17. Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, Gerber TC, Gersh B, Hillis LD, Hundley WG, Manning WJ, Printz BF, Stuber M, Woodard PK (2008) Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation 118:586–606
  18. Deeks JJ (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 323:157–162
  19. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A (2006) Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:31
  20. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CA, Kluin J, Weustink AC, Pugliese F, Vourvouri E, Cademartiri F, Bogers AJ, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ (2006) Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1658–1665
  21. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CA, Weustink AC, Pugliese F, van PN, Cademartiri F, Vourvouri E, de JP, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ (2007) 64-Slice CT coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart 93:1386–1392
  22. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, Tamci B (2007) Detection of significant coronary artery stenosis with 64-section MDCT angiography. Eur J Radiol 62:394–405
  23. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Burgstahler C, Schumacher F, Herberts T, Tsiflikas I, Schroeder S, Claussen CD, Kopp AF, Heuschmid M (2008) Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol 66:134–141
  24. Husmann L, Scheffel H, Valenta I, Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Aepli U, Siegrist PT, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P, Marincek B, Alkadhi H, Kaufmann PA (2008) Impact of hypertension on the diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography with computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:763–770
  25. Nazeri I, Shahabi P, Tehrai M, Sharif-Kashani B, Nazeri A (2010) Impact of calcification on diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice spiral computed tomography for detecting coronary artery disease: a single center experience. Arch Iran Med 13:373–383
  26. Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Wang J, Lu Y, Zhang ZL, Jiang SS, Zhou CS, Lu GM (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography. The effect of average heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcium score in a clinical perspective. Acta Radiol 51:727–740
  27. Husmann L, Schepis T, Scheffel H, Gaemperli O, Leschka S, Valenta I, Koepfli P, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P, Marincek B, Alkadhi H, Kaufmann PA (2008) Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low, intermediate, and high cardiovascular risk. Acad Radiol 15:452–461
  28. Diederichsen AC, Petersen H, Jensen LO, Thayssen P, Gerke O, Sandgaard NC, Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Mickley H (2009) Diagnostic value of cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: Importance of coronary calcium. Scand Cardiovasc J 43:1–8
  29. Meijs MF, Meijboom WB, Prokop M, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CA, Doevendans PA, de Feyter PJ, Cramer MJ (2009) Is there a role for CT coronary angiography in patients with symptomatic angina? Effect of coronary calcium score on identification of stenosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:847–854
  30. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40
  31. Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I (2010) Diagnostic power of multi-detector computed tomography for detecting patients with obstructive coronary artery disease is not influenced by severe coronary arterial calcification-The CORE-64 study. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:A74
  32. Burgstahlar C, Reiman A, Drosch T, Heuschmid M, Broddoefel H, Tsiflikas I, Haberle E, Uysal I, Wurster D, Claussen CD, Kopp AF, Schroeder S (2007) Cardiac dual-source tomography in patients with severe coronary calcifications and a high prevalence of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 1:143–151
  33. Husmann L, Leschka S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Schepis T, Koepfli P, Gaemperli O, Marincek B, Kaufmann P, Alkadhi H (2006) Influence of body mass index on coronary artery opacification in 64-slice CT angiography. Rofo 178:1007–1013
  34. Zhang S, Levin DC, Halpern EJ, Fischman D, Savage M, Walinsky P (2008) Accuracy of MDCT in assessing the degree of stenosis caused by calcified coronary artery plaques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1676–1683
  35. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Frauenfelder T, Schertler T, Husmann L, Grunenfelder J, Genoni M, Kaufmann PA, Marincek B, Leschka S (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16:2739–2747
  36. Chao SP, Law WY, Kuo CJ, Hung HF, Cheng JJ, Lo HM, Shyu KG (2010) The diagnostic accuracy of 256-row computed tomographic angiography compared with invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31:1916–1923
  37. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Vorobiof G, Nallamshetty L, Mitsouras D, Ersoy H, Mather RT, Judy PF, Cai T, Coyner K, Schultz K, Whitmore AG, Di Carli MF (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535–546
  38. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, Boogers MJ, Kroft LJ, de RA, Reiber JH, Sieders A, Spano F, Jukema JW, Schalij MJ, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis. Invest Radiol 45:331–340
  39. de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, Kroft LJ, de Roos A, Reiber JH, Boersma E, Schalij MJ, Spano F, Jukema JW, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31:1908–1915
  40. Vlahos I, Godoy MC, Naidich DP (2010) Dual-energy computed tomography imaging of the aorta. J Thorac Imaging 25:289–300
  41. Godoy MC, Naidich DP, Marchiori E, Leidecker C, Schmidt B, Assadourian B, Vlahos I (2010) Single-acquisition dual-energy multidetector computed tomography: analysis of vascular enhancement and postprocessing techniques for evaluating the thoracic aorta. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:670–677
• 作者单位：1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark2. Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA3. Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark4. Lyovej 18, 3.TV, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  Cardiology
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-0743

文摘

To determine via meta-analysis the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) for assessment of significant obstructive coronary artery stenosis at different coronary artery calcium score (CACS) levels. Data of 12,053 versus 5,890 segments, 906 versus 758 arteries and 1,120 versus 514 patients in low versus high CACS subgroups from 19 eligible studies were compared. The per-patient prevalence of coronary artery disease was 48% versus 68%, respectively. Subgroups were stratified by different CACS thresholds ranging from 100 to 400. Meta-analyses of per-patient data comparing overall low versus high CACS subgroups resulted in a sensitivity of 97.5 (95.5–99)% versus 97 (94.5–98.5)%, specificity of 85 (82–88)% versus 66.5 (58–74.5)%, diagnostic odds ratio of 153 (81–290) versus 40 (20–83), positive predictive value of 85 (82–87)% versus 86 (84–88)%, negative predictive value of 97.5 (95–99)% versus 91 (88–94)% and overall accuracy of 91% versus 89% with 95% confidence interval, respectively. The drop in specificity was significant (P = 0.035), while the sensitivity and overall accuracy were insignificantly changed (P > 0.05). Meta-analyses of independent subgroups at CACS levels ≤10 and ≤100 demonstrated high specificities of 90 (94–100)% and 88.5 (81–91.5)%, whereas at CACS levels ≥400 the specificity declined significantly to 42 (28–56)% but with consistently retained high sensitivity of 97.5 (94–99)%. The specificity of CTA decreases with increasing CACS, while the sensitivity remains high independent of that. The suggested CACS thresholds are arbitrary and do not necessarily warrant cancelling angiography. Diagnostic studies are needed to explore whether a specific CACS threshold may serve as a pre-angiographic gatekeeper to prevent likely equivocal angiographies.