Urban-Rural Synergies: An Explorative Study at the NUTS3 Level

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Eveline van Leeuwen
• 关键词：Urban ; rural interactions ; Factor analysis ; NUTS3 regions ; Europe
• 刊名：Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：September 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：8
• 期：3
• 页码：273-289
• 全文大小：545 KB
• 参考文献：Armstrong, D. (2000). A survey of community gardens in upstate New York: implications for health promotion and community development. Health & Place, 6, 319-27.CrossRef
  Blom, J. C. (1992). An evaluation of EC cereal policy instruments. Mededeling 457. The Hague:LEI.
  Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-61.CrossRef
  Dahlstr?m, M. (1996). Young women in a male periphery -experiences from the Scandinavian north. Journal of Rural Studies, 12, 259-71.CrossRef
  Dewey, R. (1960). The rural-urban continuum: real but relatively unimportant. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 60-6.CrossRef
  Union, E. (2010). Eurostat regional yearbook 2010. Belgium:Eurostat Statistical Books.
  Union, E. (2011). Eurostat regional yearbook 2011. Belgium:Eurostat Statistical Books.
  Fox, W. F., Herzog Jr., H. W., & Schlottman, A. M. (1989). Metropolitan fiscal structure and migration. Journal of Regional Science, 29, 523-36.CrossRef
  Gabriel, K. R., & Sokal, R. R. (1969). A new statistical approach to geographic variation analysis. Systematic Biology, 18(3), 259-78.
  Garnett, T. (1999). Urban agriculture in London: rethinking our food economy, paper presented at the international workshop ‘growing cities growing food-in Havana. Cuba.
  Guerrya, A. D., Ruckelshausa, M. H., Arkemaa, K. K., Bernhardta, J. R., Guannela, G., Kima, C.-K., Marsikb, M., Papenfusa, M., Tofta, J. E., Verutesa, G., et al. (2012). Modeling benefits from nature: using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning. International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, iFirst, 1-5.
  Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tathamand, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed., ). New Jersey:Prentice-Hall International.
  Harris, S., Alasia, A., & Bollman, R. D. (2008). Rural commuting. Perspectives on Labour and Income, 9(11), 13-1.
  Henry, M. S., Barkley, D. L., & Bao, S. (1997). The hinterland’s stake in metropolitan growth: evidence from selected southern regions. Journal of Regional Science, 37(3), 479-01.CrossRef
  Isserman, A. M., Feser, E., & Warren, D. E. (2009). Why some rural places prosper and others do not. International Regional Science Review, 32(3), 300-42.CrossRef
  Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York:Random House.
  Losch, A. (1954). The economics of location. Translated from the second revised edition. New Haven, Conn:Yale University Press.
  Malcolm, J. M., & Owen, S. (2008). The future of services in rural England: the drivers of change and a scenario for 2015. Progress in Planning, 69(3), 93-30.CrossRef
  Matula, D. W., & Sokal, R. R. (1980). Properties of Gabriel graphs relevant to geographic variation research and the clustering of points in the plane. Geographical Analysis, 12(3), 205-22.CrossRef
  McDonnell, M. J., Pickett, S., Groffman, P., Bohlen, P., Pouyat, R. V., Zipperer, W. C., Parmelee, R. W., Carreiro, M. M., & Medley, K. (1997). Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 1(1), 21-6.CrossRef
  Moseley, M. J., & Owen, S. (2008). The future of services in rural England: the drivers of change and a scenario for 2015. Progress in Planning, 69(3), 93-30.CrossRef
  Nahab, S. (1975). Tourism management. London:Tourism International Press.
  Nickerson, C., Ebel, R., Borchers, A., & Carriazo, F. (2011). Major uses of land in the United States, 2007. Economic Information Bulletin, No. (EIB-89).
  Nicolau, J. L., & Más, F. J. (2008). Sequential choice behavior: going on vacation and type of destination. Tourism Management, 29(5), 1023-034.CrossRef
  Palmieri, A., Dominici, P., Kasanko, M., & Martino, L. (2011). Diversified landscape structure in the EU member states landscape indicators from the LUCAS1 2009 survey. Eurostat:Statistics in Focus.
  Partridge, M. D., Ali, K., & Olfert, M. (2010). Rural-to-urban commuting: three degrees of integration. Growth and Change, 41(2), 303-35.CrossRef
  Rees, W., & Wackernagel, M. (1996). Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable- and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, 223-48.CrossRef
  Renkow, M., & Hoover, D. (2000). Commuting, migration, and rural-urban population dynamics. Journal of Regional Science, 40(2), 261-87.CrossRef
  Rouwendal, J., & Meijer, E. (2001). Preferences for housing, jobs and commuting: a mixed logit analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 41(3), 475-05.CrossRef
  Tacoli, C. (2003). The links between urban and rural development. Environment and Urbanization, 15(1), 3-2.CrossRef
  Van Leeuwen, E. S. (2010). Urban-rural interactions: towns as focus points in rural development. Contributions to economics. Heidelberg:Springer.CrossRef
  van Leeuwe
• 作者单位：Eveline van Leeuwen (1)
  
  1. VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  
• 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
• 刊物主题：Geography
  Landscape, Regional and Urban Planning
  Demography
  Human Geography
  Geography
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1874-4621

文摘

Regions are continually developing. Innovations in agricultural and industrial production affect urban and rural areas in different ways, and climate change and developments in transport and (tele)communication have strong effects on the interaction between them. Although urban and rural areas are often studied separately, systemic effects are clearly important when studying their interactions. This article aims to get a better understanding of the importance of urban-rural interaction between European regions. Therefore, a regional analysis using factor analysis and spatial correlation is used to show the presence and direction of urban-rural interactions. The results indicate that rural areas benefit from having more urban neighbors in terms of employment and employment growth as well as a stronger tourism sector. At the same time, urban areas with more rural neighbors experience a higher level of (relative) GDP growth. In addition, they are also related to higher levels of employment and population growth. Overall, the analysis shows that having more ‘opposite-neighbors appears to be beneficial to both urban and rural regions. More research with more specific indicators, for example related to quality of life, as well as a more complete dataset, is necessary to confirm these conclusions. Keywords Urban-rural interactions Factor analysis NUTS3 regions Europe