Fusion rate according to mixture ratio and volumes of bone graft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: minimum 2-year follow-up
刊名:European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
出版年:2015
出版时间:July 2015
年:2015
卷:25
期:1-supp
页码:183-189
全文大小:557 KB
参考文献:1.Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV (2008) Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 9(6):560–565. doi:10.3171/SPI.2008.9.08142 PubMed CrossRef 2.Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, Sandhu FA, Spears J, Kelly K, Rice L, Fessler RG (2005) Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 3(2):98–105. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0098 PubMed CrossRef 3.Mummaneni PV, Rodts GE, Jr (2005) The mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 57(4):256–261 discussion 256–261PubMed CrossRef 4.Park P, Foley KT (2008) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 25(2):E16. doi:10.3171/FOC/2008/25/8/E16 PubMed CrossRef 5.Park Y, Ha JW, Lee YT, Sung NY (2011) The effect of a radiographic solid fusion on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 11(3):205–212PubMed CrossRef 6.Aspenberg P, Albrektsson T, Thorngren KG (1989) Local application of growth-factor IGF-1 to healing bone. Experiments with a titanium chamber in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 60(5):607–610. doi:10.3109/17453678909150132 PubMed CrossRef 7.Cook SD, Dalton JE, Prewett AB, Whitecloud TS, 3rd (1995) In vivo evaluation of demineralized bone matrix as a bone graft substitute for posterior spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 (8):877–886. doi:10.1097/00007632-199504150-00002 8.Cook SD, Dalton JE, Tan EH, Whitecloud TS, 3rd, Rueger DC (1994) In vivo evaluation of recombinant human osteogenic protein (rhOP-1) implants as a bone graft substitute for spinal fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 (15):1655–1663. doi:10.1097/00007632-199408000-00002 9.Louis-Ugbo J, Murakami H, Kim HS, Minamide A, Boden SD (2004) Evidence of osteoinduction by Grafton demineralized bone matrix in nonhuman primate spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(4):360–366 discussion Z361CrossRef 10.Martin GJ, Jr, Boden SD, Titus L, Scarborough NL (1999) New formulations of demineralized bone matrix as a more effective graft alternative in experimental posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(7):637–645CrossRef 11.Choi DJAD, Lee SL et al (2008) The effect of demineralized bone matrix as a graft enhancer in posterior lumbar interbody fusion using cage and local bone chips. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 15(3):97. doi:10.4184/jkss.2008.15.3.157 CrossRef 12.Spivak JM, Hasharoni A (2001) Use of hydroxyapatite in spine surgery. Eur Spine J 10(Suppl 2):S197–S204. doi:10.1007/s005860100286 PubMedCentral PubMed CrossRef 13.Chung JMCB, Lee CK, Lee JH et al (2009) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite block—comparison with metal and PEEK cages. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 16(4):7. doi:10.4184/jkss.2009.16.4.243 14.Burkus JK, Foley K, Haid RW, LeHuec JC (2001) Surgical Interbody Research Group—radiographic assessment of interbody fusion devices: fusion criteria for anterior lumbar interbody surgery. Neurosurg Focus 10(4):E11PubMed CrossRef 15.Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 (15 Suppl):S26–35. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000076895.52418.5E 16.Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S1–S6PubMed CrossRef 17.Thalgott JS, Giuffre JM, Fritts K, Timlin M, Klezl Z (2001) Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using coralline hydroxyapatite with or without demineralized bone matrix, as an adjunct to autologous bone. Spine J 1(2):131–137PubMed CrossRef 18.Hwang CJBJ, Koo KH, Lee JH, Yeom JS, Chang BS, Lee CK (2007) A comparative experimental study of allograft and porous hydroxyapatite as bone substitutes. J Korean Orthop Assoc 42:7. doi:10.4055/jkoa.2007.42.4.545 19.Finkemeier CG (2002) Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(3):454–464. doi:10.3923/javaa.2010.1055.1067 20.Sartoris DJ, Gershuni DH, Akeson WH, Holmes RE, Resnick D (1986) Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes: preliminary report of radiographic evaluation. Radiology 159(1):133–137. doi:10.1016/S1067-2516(96)80058-5 PubMed CrossRef 21.Cheng USKD, Cho JL et al (2008) Comparison of the effect of hydroxyapatite and allogeneous bone as an adjunct to autogenous iliac bone grafting in posterolateral spinal fusion. J Korean Orthop Assoc 43:5CrossRef 22.Kang HJKT, Kweon SH et al (2011) The usefulness of hydroxyapatite bone transposition in treatment of metaphyseal fracture with bone defect. J Korean Musculoskelet Transpl Soc 11(1):5 23.Korovessis P, Koureas G, Zacharatos S, Papazisis Z, Lambiris E (2005) Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite. Eur Spine J 14(7):630–638. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0855-5 PubMedCentral PubMed CrossRef 24.Bucholz RW (2002) Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 395:44–52PubMed CrossRef 25.Boden SD, Martin GJ, Jr., Morone M, Ugbo JL, Titus L, Hutton WC (1999) The use of coralline hydroxyapatite with bone marrow, autogenous bone graft, or osteoinductive bone protein extract for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(4):320–327 26.Karabekir HS, Gocmen-Mas N, Edizer M, Ertekin T, Yazici C, Atamturk D (2011) Lumbar vertebra morphometry and stereological assesment of intervertebral space volumetry: a methodological study. Ann Anat 193(3):231–236. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2011.01.011 PubMed CrossRef 27.Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Elfering A, Hodler J, Boos N (2006) Effect of aging and degeneration on disc volume and shape: a quantitative study in asymptomatic volunteers. J Orthop Res 24(5):1086–1094. doi:10.1002/jor.20113 PubMed CrossRef 28.Riouallon G, Lachaniette CH, Poignard A, Allain J (2013) Outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion in low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a continuous series of 65 cases with an average follow-up of 6.6 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(2):155–161. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.009 PubMed CrossRef 29.Zairi F, Arikat A, Allaoui M, Assaker R (2013) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison between open and mini-open approaches with two years follow-up. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 74(3):131–135. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1330956 PubMed CrossRef
作者单位:Jae-Sung Yoo (1) Sang-Hyuk Min (1) Sung-Hyun Yoon (1)
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, 16-5 Anseo-dong, Cheonan, 330-715, Korea
刊物类别:Medicine
刊物主题:Medicine & Public Health Surgical Orthopedics Traumatic Surgery
出版者:Springer Paris
ISSN:1432-1068
文摘
Objectives Hydroxyapatite (HA) is commonly used as bone substitute in clinical practices. However, only few studies have compared the relationship between the mixture ratio of bone graft in the actual clinical field and fusion rate according to bone graft volume. The study aimed to analyze the fusion rate according to the mixture ratio and the amount of bone graft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).