Minimal-invasiver vs. transglutealer Hüftgelenkersatz
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:PD Dr. D. Wohlrab (1)
    J.-W. Droege (1)
    Dr. T. Mendel (1)
    Dr. K. Brehme (2)
    K. Riedl (1) (3)
    Prof. Dr. S. Leuchte (3)
    Prof. Dr. W. Hein (1)
  • 关键词:MIS ; Minimal ; invasive Hüftendoprothetik ; Watson ; Jones ; Zugang ; HHS ; Weichteiltrauma ; MIS ; Minimally invasive THR ; Watson ; Jones approach ; HHS ; Soft tissue trauma
  • 刊名:Der Orthop?de
  • 出版年:2008
  • 出版时间:November 2008
  • 年:2008
  • 卷:37
  • 期:11
  • 页码:1121-1126
  • 全文大小:401KB
  • 参考文献:1. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W (1979) The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 95: 47-9 CrossRef
    2. Berger RA, Duwelius PJ (2004) The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 35: 163-72 CrossRef
    3. Bertin KC, R?ttinger H (2004) Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop 429: 248-55 CrossRef
    4. Brown TD, Johnston RC, Saltzman CL et al. (2006) Posttraumatic osteoarthritis: a first estimate of incidence, prevalence, and burden of disease. J Orthop Trauma 20: 739-44 CrossRef
    5. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N et al. (2005) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 20: 139-44 CrossRef
    6. Chung WK, Liu D, Foo LS (2004) Mini-incision total hip replacement-surgical technique and early results. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 12: 19-4
    7. DiGioia AM, III, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B (2003) Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18: 123-28 CrossRef
    8. Gravius S, Wirtz DC, Maus U et al. (2007) Zugangswege zum Hüftgelenk beim künstlichen Gelenkerstaz unter minimalinvasivem Aspekt-eine Standortbestimmung im Rahmen des ?OrthoMIT-Projektes zur Entwicklung einer integrierten Plattform für schonende operative orthop?disch-traumatologische Therapie. Z Orthop Unfall 145: 608-14 CrossRef
    9. Gutteck N (2007) Minimal-invasiver Midvastus-Zugang versus stadardisierter Midvastus-Zugang in der Knieendoprothetik: Kurzfristige Ergebnisse einer prospektiven, randomisierten Studie. Dissertation, Medizinische Fakult?t, Universit?t Halle
    10. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51: 737-55
    11. Hart R, Stipcak V, Janecek M, Visna P (2005) Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach. Acta Orthop Belg 71: 60-4
    12. Higuchi F, Gotoh M, Yamaguchi N et al. (2003) Minimally invasive uncemented total hip arthroplasty through an anterolateral approach with a shorter skin incision. J Orthop Sci 8: 812-17 CrossRef
    13. Hube R, Zaage M, Hein W, Reichel H (2004) Frühfunktionelle Ergebnisse einer Kurzschaftprothese des Hüftgelenkes mit metaphys?r-intertrochant?rer Verankerung. Orthopade 33: 1249-258 CrossRef
    14. Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS et al. (2003) Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(Suppl 4): 39-8
    15. Kessler S, Mattes T, Cakir B et al. (2007) Der Einfluss von pr?operativem Funktionsstatus und Schmerz auf das patientenzentrierte Frühergebnis nach Hüftendoprothesen-Implantation. Z Orthop Unfall 145: 563-67 CrossRef
    16. Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Accadbled F et al. (2006) Learning curve for a modified Watson-Jones minimally invasive approach in primary total hip replacement: analysis of complications and early results versus the standard-incision posterior approach. Acta Orthop Belg 72: 693-01
    17. Leuchte S, Riedl K, Wohlrab D (2008) Frühfunktionelle Vorteile von minimalinvasiv implantierten Hüfttotalendoprothesen -Ganganalytische Befunde zur Symmetrie und Belastung aus der Messung der Bodenreaktionskraft. Z Orthop Unfall (submitted)
    18. McLaren RH (1973) Prosthetic hip angulation. Radiology 107: 705-06
    19. Nakamura S, Matsuda K, Arai N et al. (2004) Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28: 214-17 CrossRef
    20. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P et al. (2005) A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87: 701-10 CrossRef
    21. Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Pour AE et al. (2006) Hip arthroplasty with minimally invasive surgery: a survey comparing the opinion of highly qualified experts vs patients. J Arthroplasty 21: 38-6 CrossRef
    22. Pilot P, Kerens B, Draijer WF et al. (2006) Is minimally invasive surgery less invasive in total hip replacement? A pilot study. Injury 37(Suppl 5): 17-3 CrossRef
    23. Pour AE, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF et al. (2007) Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play? J Bone Joint Surg 89: 1920-927 CrossRef
    24. R?ttinger H (2006) Minimal invasiver anterolateraler Zugang in der Hüftendoprothetik. Orthopade 35: 708-15 CrossRef
    25. Strecker W, Gebhard F, Rager J et al. (1999) Early biochemical characterization of soft-tissue trauma and fracture trauma. J Trauma 47: 358-64 CrossRef
    26. Suzuki K, Kawachi S, Sakai H et al. (2004) Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a quantitative assessment of laboratory data and clinical outcomes. J Orthop Sci 9: 571-75 CrossRef
    27. Vavken P, Kotz R, Dorotka R (2007) Der minimalinvasive Hüftersatz -eine Metaanalyse. Z Orthop Unfall 145: 152-56 CrossRef
    28. Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR (2002) Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics 25: 1031-043
    29. Wohlrab D, Hagel A, Hein W (2004) Vorteile der minimalinvasiven Implantation von Hüfttotalendoprothesen in der frühen postoperativen Rehabilitationsphase. Z Orthop 142: 685-90 CrossRef
    30. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF et al. (2004) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: 1353-358
  • 作者单位:PD Dr. D. Wohlrab (1)
    J.-W. Droege (1)
    Dr. T. Mendel (1)
    Dr. K. Brehme (2)
    K. Riedl (1) (3)
    Prof. Dr. S. Leuchte (3)
    Prof. Dr. W. Hein (1)

    1. Zentrum für Erkrankungen der Haltungs- und Bewegungsorgane, Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthop?die, Martin-Luther-Universit?t Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Stra?e 22, 06097, Halle, Deutschland
    2. Zentrum für Erkrankungen der Haltungs- und Bewegungsorgane, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Martin-Luther-Universit?t Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Deutschland
    3. Institut für Medien, Kommunikation und Sport, Department Sportwissenschaft, Martin-Luther-Universit?t Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Deutschland
文摘
Background The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the results after total hip replacement (THR) using an MIS approach versus a regular transgluteal approach (Bauer approach). Method We compared 20 THRs using a modified Watson-Jones minimally invasive approach (MIS group) with 20 conventionally performed THRs using a Bauer approach (control group). In all cases, the same implants (Trilogy cup, MAYO stem) were used. The Harris Hip Score (HHS), the visual analogue scale, myoglobin level, and creatinine kinase level were measured preoperatively and up to 3 months postoperatively. Results Advantages of the MIS group were evaluated using the HHS in the categories of activity and range of motion 6 weeks postoperatively. In terms of function, gait, and total HHS, we found benefits in the MIS group 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Up to 48?h postoperatively, patients in the MIS group had lower myoglobin blood levels. No differences were found in creatinine kinase levels, pain sensation as measured by visual analogue scale, or implant positioning. Conclusion Use of the minimally invasive Watson-Jones approach shows advantages compared with the transgluteal Bauer approach 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Up to now there has been no prospective randomized clinical study that has definitely shown the superiority of the minimally invasive procedure. For that reason, the conventional approaches in THR are still the gold standard.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700