Turkish Migrants-Organizations in Germany and Their Role in the Flow of Remittances to Turkey

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Zeynep Sezgin (1)
  
• 关键词：Turkish migrant organizations ; Germany ; Remittances ; Development ; organisations turques pour migrants ; Allemagne ; versements ; dèveloppement
• 刊名：Journal of International Migration and Integration
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：August 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：12
• 期：3
• 页码：231-251
• 全文大小：291KB
• 参考文献：1. Abadan-Unat, N. (2006). / Bitmeyen G??: Konuk I??ilikten Ulus-?tesi Yurtta?l??a. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Yayinevi.
  2. Akkoyunlu, S., & Kholodilin, K. (2006). / What Affects the Remittances of Turkish Workers: Turkish or German Output? Discussion Papers 622. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research.
  3. Alper, A. M., & Neyapti, B. (2006). Determinants of workers-remittances: Turkish evidence from high frequency data. / Eastern European Economics, 44(5), 91-00. CrossRef
  4. Aydas, O. T., Metin-Ozcan, K., & Neyapti, B. (2005). Determinants of workers-remittances: The case of Turkey. / Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41(3), 53-7.
  5. Baraulina, T., & Borchers, K. (2008). / Wer migriert, der entwickelt? Bedingungen und Formen des entwicklungspolitischen Engagements von Diaspora. DOSSIER Migration und Entwicklung http://www.migration-boell.de/web/migration/46_1908.asp. (Accessed 23 October 2009).
  6. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. (2005). Fachtagung “Integration und Islam- Schriftenreihe Band 14 http://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Asyl/Publikationen/schriftenreihe-band-14,templateId%3Draw,property%3DpublicationFile.pdf/schriftenreihe-band-14.pdf (Accessed 02 August 2010).
  7. Bundesministerium des Innern. (2009). Verfassungsschutzbericht 2008. Vorabfassung. Berlin: Bundesministerium des Innern.
  8. Bundesregierung für Migration, Flüchtlinge und Integration. 2007. 7. Bericht der Beauftragten der Bundesregierung für Migration, Flüchtlinge und Integration über die Lage der Ausl?nderinnen und Ausl?nder in Deutschland (Dezember 2007).
  9. Caglar, A. (2006). Hometown associations, the rescaling of state spatiality and migrant grassroots transnationalism. / Global Networks, 6(1), 1-2. CrossRef
  10. Carling, J. (2004). / Policy options for increasing the benefits of remittances. Compas working paper 8. Oxford: University of Oxford.
  11. Commission of the European Community. (2005). / Migration und Entwicklung: Konkrete Leitlinien. Brussels: Commission to the Parliament.
  12. Danzer, A. M., & Utku, H. 2008. Determinants of Integration and its Impact on the Economic Success of Immigrants: A Case Study of the Turkish Community in Berlin. DEPP Working Paper Series, Paper 24.
  13. Daume, H., Baraulina, T., Bommes, M., El-Cherkeh, T., Vadean, F. (2007). Egyptian, Afghan, and Serbian Diaspora Communities in Germany: How do they contribute to their country of origin, HWWI Research Paper, 3-, Hamburg, Januar, 2007 http://www.hwwi.org/uploads/tx_wilpubdb/HWWI_Research_Paper_3-5_e_2.pdf (Accessed 20 October 2009).
  14. Deen, T. (2009). / Remittances drive also political change. International Press Service. United Nations. October 5.
  15. De Haas, H. (2006). Engaging diasporas. How Governments and Development Agencies can Support Diaspora Involvement in the Development of Origin Countries, International Migration Institute. Oxford www.thehagueprocess.org/News/News/documenten/Engaging_Diasporas_Hein_de_Haas.pdf (Accessed 10 October 2009).
  16. Diehl, C. (2002). / Die Partizipation von Migranten in Deutschland. Rückzug oder Mobilisierung? Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
  17. Doorn, van Judith. (2009). Migration, Remittances and Development. ILO http://www.ilo.org/public/english/dialogue/actrav/publ/129/8.pdf (Accessed 23 September 2009).
  18. Elwert, G. (1982). Probleme der Ausl?nderintegration, Gesellschaftliche Integration durch Binnenintegration? / K?lner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 4, 717-31.
  19. Esser, H. (1996). Ethnische Kolonien: ‘Binnenintegration-oder gesellschaftliche Isolation? In Hoffmann-Zlotnik (Ed.), / Segregation oder Integration. Die Situation von Arbeitsmigranten im Aufnahmeland (pp. 106-17). Mannheim: Forschung Raum und Gesellschafts.
  20. Faist, T. (2000). / The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Faye, M. (2007). Die senegalesische Diaspora in Deutschland. Ihr Beitrag zur Entwicklung Senegals. Eschborn: GTZ. www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/de-senegalesische-diaspora-2007.pdf (Accessed 12 October 2009).
  22. Flam, H. (Ed.). (2007). / Migranten in Deutschland. Statistiken Fakten Diskurse. Konstanz: UVK.
  23. Gallina, A. (2008). Enhancing Workers-Remittances for Development in the Mediterranean Partner Countries. European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.
  24. Gomolla, M., & Radtke-Olaf, F. (2002). / Institutionelle Diskriminierung. Die Herstellung ethnischer Differenz in der Schule. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
  25. Gordon, M. M. (1964). / Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins (p. 71). Oxford University: New York.
  26. Graeme, H. (2003). / Migration and development: A perspective from Asia (p. 14). Genf: IOM Migration Research Series Nr.
  27. Halm, D., & Sauer, M. (2005). / Freiwilliges Engagement von Türkinnen und Türken in Deutschland. Essen: Stiftung Zentrum für Türkeistudien im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.
  28. Icduygu, A. (2006). International Migrants Remittances in Turkey. Cooperation Project on the Social Integration of Immigrants, Migration, and the Movement of Persons. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies: European University Institute, RSCAS.
  29. Icduygu, A. (2005). Migration, Remittances and their Impact on Economic Development in Turkey. In OECD (ed.) / Migration, Remittances and Development. Paris: OECD pp. 89-7
  30. IGMG. (2009). / Selbstdarstellung. Kerpen: IGMG.
  31. InWEnt. (2007). Migration und kommunale Entwicklungszusammenarbeit. Gutachten zum aktuellen Stand und den Potenzialen des ZusammenwirkensMigration und kommunale Entwicklungszusammenarbeit Verbinden. Nr. 31. Bonn: InWEnt
  32. Itzigsohn, J., & Giorguli-Suacedo, S. (2005). Incorporation, transnationalism, and gender: Immigrant incorporation and transnational participation as gendered processes. / International Migration Review, 39(4), 895-20. CrossRef
  33. Joppke, C. (1999). / Immigration and the Nation State. The United States, Germany and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Jones, R. C. (1998). Remittances and Inequality: a question of Migration Stage and Geographic Scale. / Economic Geography, 74(1), 8-5. CrossRef
  35. Kausch, I. (2007). Die Zusammenarbeit mit Migranten und Migrantenvereinigungen in der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit der Bundesregierung. In: InWEnt (ed.) / Migration und kommunale Entwicklungszusammenarbeit Verbinden. Nr. 28: 21-5 http://www.service-eine-welt.de/images/text_material-1049.img. (Accessed 23 October 2009).
  36. Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (2002). How National Citizenship Shapes Transnationalism: A comparative analysis of migrant and minority claims-making in Germany, Great Britain and the Netherlands. In C. Joppke & E. Morawska (Eds.), / Toward assimilation and citizenship: Immigrants in liberal Nation-States (pp. 195-38). London: Palgrave.
  37. Ko?, I., & Onan, I. (2004). International Migrants-Remittances and Welfare Status of the Left-Behind Families in Turkey. / International Migration Review, 38(1), 78-12. CrossRef
  38. K?ksal, Elif. (2006). Determinants and Impact on the Turkish Economy of Remittances. Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, Ecole Doctorale d’Economie, unpublished working paper.
  39. K?ksal, E. & Liebig, T. (2005). Principal channels and costs of remittances: The case of Turkey. In OECD (Ed) / Migration, Remittances and Development (pp. 103-22). Paris: OECD.
  40. Laurence, J. (2007). Islam and citizenship in Germany. Europe Report No. 181. International Crisis Group.
  41. Landolt, P., & Goldring, L. (2008). Immigrant Political Socialization as Bridging and Boundary Work: Mapping the Multi-Layered Incorporation of Latin American Immigrants in Toronto. / Global Networks, 10(4), 1-4.
  42. Levitt, P., & Lamba-Nieves, D. (2010). Social remittances revisited. In: / International migration review, under review.
  43. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: formal structures as myth and ceremony. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), / The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 41-2). Chicago, Ill: The University of Chicago Press.
  44. Newland, K., & Patrick, E. (2004). Beyond remittances: The role of diaspora in poverty reduction in their countries of origin. A Scooping Study by the Migration Policy Institute for the Department of International Development. Washington, DC.
  45. OECD. (2006). / International Migration Outlook 2006. SOPEMI. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  46. OECD. (2007). Policy Coherence for Development. Migration and Developing Countries. A Development Centre Perspective. Development Centre of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  47. Orozco, M. (2000). Latino Hometown Associations as Agent of Development in Latin America. / Inter-American Dialogue, June issue.
  48. Orozco, Manuel. 2003. Hometown Associations and their Present and Future Partnerships: New Development Opportunities? Washington DC: Interamerican Dialogue. http://hdr.undp.org/docs/network/hdr_net/ACFEE1A.pdf (Accessed 23 July 2008).
  49. Orozco, M., & Welle, K. (2004). Hometown Associations and Development. A look at ownership, sustainability, correspondence, and replicability. / Inter-American Dialogue, unpublished paper.
  50. ?stergaard-Nielsen, E. (2003). / Transnational politics: Turks and Kurds in Germany. New York & London: Routledge.
  51. ?zcan, E. (1989). / Türkische Immigrantenorganisationen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die Entwicklung politischer Organisationen und politischer Orientierung unter türkischen Migranten in der BRD und Berlin West. Berlin: Hitit Verlag.
  52. Portes, A., Escobar, C., & Walton, R. A. (2007). Immigrant transnational organizations and development: A comparative study. / International Migration Review, 41(1), 242-81. CrossRef
  53. Pries, L. (2010). (Grenzüberschreitende) Migrantenorganisationen als Gegenstand der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung: Klassische Problemstellungen und neuere Forschungsbefunde. In: L. Pries & Z. Sezgin (Eds.), / Jenseits von ?Identit?t oder Integration-Grenzen überspannende Migrantenorganisationen (pp. 15-1). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. CrossRef
  54. Pries, L., & Sezgin, Z. (2010). / Jenseits von ?Identit?t oder Integration-Grenzen überspannende Migrantenorganisationen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. CrossRef
  55. Pries, L., & Goebel, D. (2003). Transnationale Migration und die Inkorporation von Migranten. In: F. Swiaczny & S. Haug (Eds.) Migration - Integration - Minderheiten (pp. 35-8). Wiesbaden: Bundesinstitut für Bevolkerungsforschung.
  56. Ratha, D., Mohapatra, S., Silwal, A. (2009). Outlook for Remittance Flows 2009-011. Migration and Remittances Team, Development Prospects Group, World Bank. Migration and Development Brief 10.
  57. Reind, N., Herdt, I., Mortezai, J. (2007). Mobile Perspektivenberatung für rückkehrwillige Flüchtlinge. In: InWEnt (Ed.) / Migration und kommunale Entwicklungszusammenarbeit Verbinden. Nr. 28: 27-8. http://www.service-eine-welt.de/images/text_material-1049.img (Accessed 23 October 2009).
  58. Rosenow, Kerstin (forthcoming): Muslim umbrella organizations in Germany in the 21st century—between institutional expectations and member interests. PhD Thesis, Department of Social Sciences, Ruhr-University Bochum.
  59. Sayan, S. (2004). Guest workers-remittances and output fluctuations in host and home countries. The case of remittances from Turkish workers. / Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 40(6), 70-4.
  60. Schiffauer, W. (2010). / Nach dem Islamismus: Die Islamische Gemeinschaft Milli G?rüs; eine Ethnographie. 1. Aufl., Orig.-Ausg. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.
  61. Schmelz, A. (2007). / Die kamerunische Diaspora in Deutschland. Ihr Beitrag zur Entwicklung Kameruns. Eschborn: GTZ.
  62. Sekoh, R. (2007). Ein Praxisbeispiel aus Schleswig-Holstein: Der Deutsch-Ghanaische Entwicklungshilfeverein. In: InWEnt (Ed.) / Migration und kommunale Entwicklungszusammenarbeit Verbinden. Nr. 28. Dokumentation des Seminars vom 28.08.2007: 17-0 http://www.service-eine-welt.de/images/text_material-1049.img (Accessed 23 October 2009).
  63. Sezgin, Z. (2008). / Umbrella Organizations of Turkish Migrants: A Comparative Analysis of Migrants-Claims-Making in Austria and Germany. PhD Thesis. University of Leipzig, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.
  64. Soysal, Y. N. (1994). / Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
  65. S?kefeld, M. (2008). / Struggling for recognition. The Alevi Movement in Germany and in transnational space. New York: Berghan Books.
  66. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2009). / Bev?lkerung und Erwerbst?tigkeit. Ausl?ndische Bev?lkerung. Ergebnisse des Ausl?nderzentralregisters 2008. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.
  67. T.C. Calisma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanligi. Yurtdisindaki Vatandaslarimizla Ilgili Sayisal Bilgiler. http://www.csgb.gov.tr/csgbPortal/ShowProperty?nodeId=/WLPRepository/10073 (Accessed 6 August 2010).
  68. Thr?nhardt, D., & Wei?, K. (2005). Selbsthilfe, Netzwerke und soziales Kapital in der pluralistischen Gesellschaft. In D. Thr?nhardt & K. Weiss (Eds.), / SelbstHilfe. Wie Migranten Netzwerke knüpfen und soziales Kapital schaffen (pp. 8-5). Freiburg: Lambertus.
  69. The Turkey Analyst, BI-Weekly Briefing. Vol.1(14), 26 September 2008 http://www.silkroadstudies.org/new/inside/turkey/2008/080926-TRA.pdf (Accessed 23 October 2009).
  70. Treiber, M. (2007). Rückkehrf?rderung der AWO Schleswig-Holstein. In: InWEnt (Ed.) / Migration und kommunale Entwicklungszusammenarbeit Verbinden. Nr. 28: 25-6. http://www.service-eine-welt.de/images/text_material-1049.img (Accessed 23 October 2009).
  71. Vermeulen, F. F. (2007). / The immigrant organising process: The emergence and persistence of Turkish immigrant organisations in Amsterdam and Berlin and Surinamese organisations in Amsterdam, 1960-000. Amsterdam: IMISCOE Dissertations.
  72. Worbs, S. (2007). Parallelgesellschaften von Zuwanderern in Deutschland? / soFid, 1, 7-7.
  73. World Bank. (2008). / World Bank Staff Estimates of Remittances, based on the International Monetary Fund’s Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook 2007. Washington.
  74. Yurdakul, G. (2009). / From Guest Workers into Muslims: The Transformation of Turkish Immigrant Associations in Germany. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
  75. Ziesemer, T. H. W. (2008). / Worker Remittances, Migration, Accumulation and Growth in Poor Developing Countries. United Nations University. Working Paper Series 2008-063.
  
• 作者单位：Zeynep Sezgin (1)
  
  1. Chair of Sociology/Organisation, Migration, Participation (SOZOMM) & Institute for International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict (IFHV), Ruhr-University Bochum, GB 04/42, Universit?tsstra?e 150, 44780, Bochum, Germany
  

文摘

Various studies, including ?stergaard-Nielsen (New York & London: Routledge, 2003), Pries and Sezgin (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2010), Thr?nhardt and Wei? (Freiburg: Lambertus, 2005), and Yurdakul (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2009) have examined the aims, activities, functions, and structures of migrant organizations in Germany. Among others, Daume et al. 2007, Kausch (Nr. 28: 21-5 (http://www.service-eine-welt.de/images/text_material-1049.img). Accessed 23 October 2009, 2007), and Schmelz (Eschborn: GTZ, 2007) illustrated that some migrant organizations aim at supporting the development of their countries of origin. These organizations invest in infrastructure and agriculture, facilitate funding for development projects, provide post-disaster humanitarian aid, and offer social and financial assistance to their counterparts and to certain religious and/or political movements. A research gap, however, persists concerning the role of Turkish migrants-organizations (TMOs) in the flow of remittances to Turkey. Particularly, it is not clear how organizational characteristics of TMOs influence their potential in attracting and transferring remittances. Combining approaches from organizational sociology and migration research, this paper intends to generate empirically founded knowledge about TMOs in Germany, while highlighting their need to legitimate themselves in multiple organizational fields. This paper illustrates that the potential of TMOs in attracting and transferring remittances depend on multiple factors such as the demographic characteristics of the Turkish migrants, Turkish and German governmental policies, and the organizational characteristics of TMOs. It also shows that the role of TMOs in the flow of remittances is limited as: (1) Turkish migrants-social and economic resources are restricted, (2) TMOs-competency in mobilizing migrants, fundraising, project development, and management has not been fully developed, and (3) Turkish and German governments do not actively cooperate with TMOs in transferring remittances.