Science Teachers-Proficiency Levels and Patterns of TPACK in a Practical Context
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Yi-Fen Yeh ; Tzu-Chiang Lin ; Ying-Shao Hsu…
- 关键词：ICT ; Practical knowledge ; PCK ; Teacher education ; TPACK ; practical
- 刊名：Journal of Science Education and Technology
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：February 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：24
- 期：1
- 页码：78-90
- 全文大小：316 KB
- 参考文献：1. Amir R, Tamir P (1994) In-depth analysis of misconceptions as a basis for developing research-based remedial instruction: the case of photosynthesis. Am Biol Teach 56(2):94-00 CrossRef
2. Angeli C, Valanides N (2009) Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Comput Educ 52(1):154-68 CrossRef
3. Archambault LM, Barnett JH (2010) Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: exploring the TPACK framework. Comput Educ 55(4):1656-662 CrossRef
4. Bingimlas KA (2009) Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: a review of the literature. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ 5(3):235-45
5. Burgoyne N, Graham CR, Sudweeks R (2010) The validation of an instrument measuring TPACK. In: Gibson D, Dodge B (eds) Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2010. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 132-62
6. Campbell T, Abd-Hamid NH (2012) Technology use in science instruction (TUSI): aligning the integration of technology in science instruction in ways supportive of science education reform. J Sci Educ Technol 22(4):572-88 CrossRef
7. Carlson E (1994) Staff development for multimedia: coping with complexity. In: Ward A (ed) Multimedia and learning: a school leader’s guide. National School Boards Association, Alexandria, pp 53-0
8. Chai CS, Koh JHL, Tsai CC (2010) Facilitating preservice teachers-development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). J Educ Technol Soc 13(4):63-3
9. Clark CM, Peterson PL (1986) Teachers-thought processes. In: Wittrock MC (ed) Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York, pp 255-96
10. Creswell JW (2008) Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 3rd edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle River
11. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL (2011) Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd edn. Sage, Los Angeles
12. Darling-Hammond L (2006) Constructing 21st-century teacher education. J Teach Educ 57(3):300-14 CrossRef
13. Davis EA, Krajcik J (2005) Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educ Res 34(3):3-4 CrossRef
14. Ertmer PA (2005) Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educ Tech Res Dev 53(4):25-9 CrossRef
15. Falk A (2012) Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Sci Educ 96(2):265-90 CrossRef
16. Fan YC, Wang TH, Wang KH (2012) A web-based model for developing assessment literacy of secondary in-service teachers. Comput Educ 57(2):1727-740 CrossRef
17. Five H, Buehl M (2008) What do teachers believe? Developing a framework for examining beliefs about teachers-knowledge and ability. Contemp Educ Psychol 33:134-76 CrossRef
18. Flick U (2002) An introduction to qualitative research. Sage, London
19. Friedrichsen PJ, Abell SK, Pareja EM, Brown PL, Lankford DM, Volkmann MJ (2009) Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers-prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. J Res Sci Teach 46(4):357-83 CrossRef
20. Gess-Newsome J, Lederman NG (1993) Preservice biology teachers-knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: a year-long assessment. Sci Educ 77:25-5
文摘
Technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-P) refers to a unified body of knowledge that teachers develop from and for actual teaching practices with information communication technologies (ICT). This study attempted to unveil the longitudinal and multidimensional development of knowledge that teachers possess by interviewing 40 teachers with various backgrounds in subject content, years of teaching experience, and related award-winning records. An automated cluster analysis was used on the codes given to teachers-responses based on their proficiency levels in different knowledge areas. Three different types of teachers with distinctive features were identified: technology-infusive (TI), technology transitional (TR), and planning and design (PD). TI teachers were more student-centered as compared to TR teachers who were more teacher-centered when asked about possible technology uses. PD teachers were fluent in planning and designing but lacked the balanced development demonstrated by the TI and TR teachers. These science teachers-TPACK were found stayed at the level of “simple adoption.-These findings suggest that teachers-TPACK-P needs to be developed with an accumulation of contextualized and dynamic experiences during ICT implementation in actual teaching. Explicit demonstrations regarding how ICTs can be used meaningfully to assist science instruction would be needed in teacher education.