Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction using immersion ultrasound and optical biometry with and without formula optimization
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Gabor Nemeth (1) nemeth222@yahoo.com
Attila Nagy (1)
Andras Berta (1)
Laszlo Modis Jr (1) - 关键词：IOL ; constants – ; immersion biometry – ; optical biometry – ; optimization
- 刊名：Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
- 出版年：2012
- 出版时间：September 2012
- 年：2012
- 卷：250
- 期：9
- 页码：1321-1325
- 全文大小：123.5 KB
- 参考文献：1. Norrby S (2008) Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:368–376
2. Olsen T (1992) Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 18:125–129
3. Gale RP, Saldana M, Johnston RL, Zuberbuhler B, McKibbin M (2009) Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery. Eye 23:149–152
4. Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, Wirtitsch M, Petternel V, Drexler W, Rainer G, Georgopoulos M, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF (2002) Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:230–234
5. Olsen T (2007) Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:84–87
6. Charalampidou S, Cassidy L, Ng E, Loughman J, Nolan J, Stack J, Beatty S (2010) Effect on refractive outcomes after cataract surgery of intraocular lens constant personalization using the Haigis formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1081–1089
7. Raymond S, Favilla I, Santamaria L (2009) Comparing ultrasound biometry with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculations: a randomized study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:2547–2552
8. Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL (2011) Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:63–71
9. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Ruiz RS, Lewis JW, Rosenthal H (1986) Improving the predictability of intraocular lens power calculations. Arch Ophthalmol 104:539–541
10. Schelenz J, Kammann J (1989) Comparison of contact and immersion technique for axial length measurement and implant power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 15:425–428
11. Shammas HJF (1984) A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurements. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 10:444–447
12. Olsen T, Nielsen PJ (1989) Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound. Acta Ophthalmol 67:101–102
13. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B (2000) Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:765–773
14. Madge SN, Khong CH, Lamont M, Bansal A, Antcliff RJ (2005) Optimization of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the Zeiss IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:436–438
15. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, Heinzl H, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF (2001) Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:861–867
16. Hoffmann PC, H眉tz WW, Eckhardt HB, Heuring AH (1998) Intraocular lens calculation and ultrasound biometry: immersion and contact procedures. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 213:161–165
17. Hennessy MP, Franzco CDG (2003) Contact versus immersion biometry of axial length before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2195–2198
18. Hitzenberger CK, Drexler W, Dolezal C, Skorpik F, Juchem M, Fercher AF, Gnad HD (1993) Measurement of the axial length of cataract eyes by laser Doppler interferometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:1886–1893
19. Nemeth J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N (2003) Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:85–88
20. Lenhart PD, Hutchinson AK, Lynn MJ, Lambert SR (2010) Partial coherence interferometry versus immersion ultrasonography for axial length measurement in children. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:2100–2104
21. Hrebcov谩 J, Skorkovsk谩 S, Vasků A (2009) Comparison of contact and immersion techniques of ultrasound biometry in terms of target postoperative refraction. Cesk Slov Oftalmol 65:143–146
22. Narvaez J, Cherwek DH, Stulting RD, Waldron R, Zimmerman GJ, Wessels IE, Waring GO III (2008) Comparing immersion ultrasound with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 39:30–34
23. Mont茅s-Mic贸 R, Carones F, Buttacchio A, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D (2011) Comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients. J Refract Surg 27:665–671
24. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Coffman PG, Brown LK (2002) Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry; outcomes analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:239–242
25. Eleftheriadis H (2003) IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol 87:960–963
26. Percival SPB, Vyas AV, Setty SS, Manvikar S (2002) The influence of implant design on accuracy of postoperative refraction. Eye 16:309–315
27. Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC (1990) Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 16:333–340, correction, 528
28. Royal College of Ophthalmologists (2007) Cataract surgery guidelines (2004, updated 2007). Royal College of Ophthalmologists, London, p 25
29. Sheard RM, Smith GT, Cooke DL (2010) Improving the prediction accuracy of the SRK/T formula: the T2 formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1829–1834
30. Sarver EJ (2011) Comments on: Improving the prediction accuracy of the SRK/T formula: The T2 formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:795, letter
31. Sheard R, Smith G, Cooke D (2011) Reply: comments on study of SKR/T versus T2 formula, comments on: improving the prediction accuracy of the SRK/T formula: the T2 formula and what constitutes "clinically significant" improvement in implant power calculation accuracy? J Cataract Refract Surg 37:796–798, letter
32. Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS (2008) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19:13–17
33. Olsen T, Corydon L, Gimbel H (1995) Intraocular lens power calculation with an improved anterior chamber depth prediction algorithm. J Cataract Refract Surg 21:313–319
34. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS (1988) A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 14:17–24
35. Hoffer KJ (1993) The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 19:700–712, errata 1994; 20:677
36. Petermeier K, Gekeler F, Messias A, Spitzer MS, Haigis W, Szurman P (2009) Intraocular lens power calculation and optimized constants for highly myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1575–1581
37. Holladay JT (1997) Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:1356–1370
38. Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL (2011) Intraocular lens formula constant optimization and partial coherence interferometry biometry: Refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:50–62 - 作者单位：1. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei blvd. 98, H-4012 Debrecen, Hungary
- ISSN：1435-702X
文摘
Purpose Comparison of postoperative refraction results using ultrasound biometry with closed immersion shell and optical biometry.