Integration and interdisciplinarity: concepts, frameworks, and education
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Susan G. Clark ; Richard L. Wallace
- 关键词：Integration ; Interdisciplinarity ; Knowledge ; Education ; Framework ; Policy sciences
- 刊名：Policy Sciences
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：June 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：48
- 期：2
- 页码：233-255
- 全文大小：717 KB
- 参考文献：Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Anderies, J. M., Folke, C., Walker, B., & Ostrom, E. (2013). Aligning key concepts for global change policy: Robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecology and Society, 18(2),?8.
Apostel, L., & Vanlandschoot, J. (1994). Interdisciplinarity: The construction of worldviews and the dissemination of scientific results. Issues in Integrative Studies, 12, 9-2.
Arnspiger, C. V. (1959). Personality in social process: Values and strategies of individuals in a free society. Chicago: Follett.
Ascher, W., & Hirschfelder-Ascher, B. (2005). Revitalizing political psychology: The legacy of Harold D. Lasswell. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ash, N., Banco, H., Brown, C., Garcia, K., et al. (2010). Ecosystems and human well-being: A manual for assessment practitioners. Washington: Island Press.
Auer, M. R. (2006). The policy sciences in critical perspective. In J. Rabin, G. J. Miller, & W. B. Hildreth (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 541-62). London: Taylor & Francis.
Bammer, G. (2005). Integration and implementation sciences: Building a new specialization. Ecology and Society 10, 6. [online] URL: http://?www.?ecologyandsociet?y.?org/?vol10/?iss2/?art6/-/span> .
Ban, N. C., et al. (2013). A socio-ecological approach to conservation planning: Embedding social considerations. Ecology and Environment, 11(4), 194-02.
Barnosky, A. D., Hadly, E. A., Bascompte, J., Berlow, E. L., et al. (2012). Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature, 486, 52-8.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2003). Navigating socio-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biermann, F., Campe, S., & Jacob, K. (Eds.). (2004).?Proceedings of the 2002 Berlin conference on the human?dimensions of global?environmental change-em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">knowledge for the sustainability transition. The challenge for social science. Amsterdam, Berlin, Potsdam and Oldenburg: Global Governance Project.
Bohm, D., & Peat, F. D. (1987). Science, order, and creativity. New York: Bantam Books.
Bowers, C. A. (1997). The culture of denial: Why the environmental movement needs a strategy for reforming universities and public schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Brown, A. (1984). Forward. In D. H. Kerr (Ed.), Barriers to integrity: Modern modes of knowledge utilization (pp. ix–xi). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Brown, V. A. (2004). The more we are together- Australian Planner, 41, 42-5.
Brown, S. R. (2006). A match made in heaven: A marginalized methodology for studying the marginalized. Quality & Quantity, 40, 361-82.
Brown, V. A. (2010). Collective inquiry and its wicked problems. In V. A. Brown, J. A. Harris, & J. Y. Russell (Eds.), Tackling wicked problems: Through the transdisciplinary imagination (pp. 61-1). London: Earthscan.
Brunner, R. D. (1996). A milestone in the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 29, 45-8.
Brunner, R. D. (1997a). Raising standards: A prototyping strategy for undergraduate education. Policy Sciences, 30, 167-89.
Brunner, R. D. (1997b). Introduction to the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 30, 191-15.
Brunner, R. D. (1997c). Book review of “Barriers and bridges to renewable of ecosystems and institutions- Journal of Wildlife Management, 61, 1437-439.
Brunner, R. D. (2006). A paradigm for practice. Policy Sciences, 39, 135-67.
Brunner, R. D. (2007). The world revolution of our time: A review and update. Policy Sciences, 40, 191-19.
Burgess, P. M., & Slonaker, L. L. (1978). The decision seminar: A strategy for problem-solving. Merschon Center, Paper No. 1. Columbus: Ohio State University.
Cardinale, J., et al. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486, 59-7.
Chapin, F. S, III, Kofinas, G. P., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2009). Principles of ecosystem stewardship: Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. New York: Springer.
Chapin, F. S., III, Mark, A. F., Mitchell, R. A., & Dickinson, K. J. M. (2012). Design principles for social-ecological transformation toward sustainability: Lessons from New Zealand Sense of Place. Ecosphere 3(5): art40. doi:10.-890/?ES12-00009.- .
Charlesworth, J. C. (Ed.). (1972). Integration of the social sciences through policy analysis. Monograph 14. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.
Chettiparamb, A. (2007). Interdisciplinarity: A literature review. Cardiff: Higher Education Academy, Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Group, Cardiff University.
Clark, S. G. (2002). The policy process: A practical guide for natural resource professionals. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Clark, S. G. (2009). An informational approach to sustainability: “Intelligence-in conservation and natural resource management policy. Journal of Sustainable Fore - 作者单位：Susan G. Clark (1)
Richard L. Wallace (2)
1. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 195 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
2. Department of Environmental Studies, Ursinus College, 601 East Main Street, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA - 刊物类别：Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
- 刊物主题：Social Sciences
Political Science
Economic Policy - 出版者：Springer Netherlands
- ISSN：1573-0891
文摘
Humans face enormous and growing ecological and social problems. Knowledge and methods of inquiry are necessary to understand and address these problems. Although this seems obvious, arguments rage over which methods are reliable and whose perspectives and epistemology (disciplinary or otherwise) are best suited to address problems. To compound matters, knowledge is fragmented in its organization, classification, production, and use in academe, in?the professions, and in society. A practical conceptualization of interdisciplinarity in the interests of integration is needed to address the multiple perspectives, epistemologies, and fragmentation inherent?in these problems. Here, we offer a conception of integration that fosters an interrelated dynamic system of healthy people, society, and nature. Next, we look at “knowledge”—its classification, levels, and challenges. Following that, we review a model of integration almost a century old that has been abstracted into a practical, interdisciplinary meta-framework that organizes both diagnostics and prescriptive inquiry. Finally, educating about integration is a subject of central concern in many colleges and universities today, one that we discuss in terms of goals, student competence, educational designs, practical challenges, and how to address them. Our entire endeavor is couched in terms of the overarching goal of seeking the common interest of human dignity in healthy environments for all.