A Novel Adaptive Mobility-Aware MAC Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Fei Peng (1) (2)
  
  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ; University of British Columbia ; Vancouver ; BC ; V6T 1Z4 ; Canada
  2. Institute of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine ; China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences ; Beijing ; China
  
• 关键词：Design ; Performance ; Wireless sensor networks ; Mobility ; MAC ; SYNC ; Frequency
• 刊名：Wireless Personal Communications
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：March 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：81
• 期：2
• 页码：489-501
• 全文大小：427 KB
• 参考文献：1. Ye, W., Herdemann, J., & Estin, D. (2002). An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In / Proceedings of the INFOCOM 2002 (Vol. 3, pp. 1567鈥?576). IEEE Computer Society, San Francisco.
  2. Choi, Sung-Chan, Lee, Jang-Won (2010) An energy-efficient mobility-supporting MAC protocol for mobile sensor networks. IEICE Transactions on Communications E91.B: pp. 2720-2723 CrossRef
  3. Zhang, D., Li, Q., Zhang, X., & Wang, X. (2010). DE-ASS: An adaptive MAC algorithm based on mobility evaluation for wireless sensor networks. In / 6th international conference on wireless communications networking and mobile computing (WiCOM), Chengdu (pp. 1鈥?).
  4. Zareei, M, Taghizadeh, A, Budiarto, R (2011) EMS-MAC: Energy efficient contention-based MAC protocol for mobile sensor networks. The Computer Journal 54: pp. 1963-1972 CrossRef
  5. Bernardo, L., 脕gua, H., Pereira, M., Oliveira, R., Dinis, R., & Pinto, P. (2010). A MAC protocol for mobile wireless sensor networks with bursty traffic. / IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC) (pp. 1鈥?).
  6. Tang, Z., & Dargie, W. (2010). A mobility-aware medium access control protocol for wireless sensor networks, In / The fifth IEEE international workshop on heterogeneous, multi-hop, wireless and mobile networks (Globecom 2010).
  7. Khan, B. M., & Ali, F. H. (2011). Mobility adaptive CSMA/CA MAC for wireless sensor networks. In / Computational science and its applications-ICCSA. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 6782, pp. 573鈥?87).
  8. Ali, M., Suleman, T., & Uzmi, Z. A. (2005). MMAC: A mobility-adaptive, collision-free mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In / 24th IEEE international performance, computing, and communications conference (pp. 401鈥?07).
  9. Jhumka, A., & Kulkarni, S. (2007). On the design of mobility-tolerant tdma-based media access control (mac) protocol for mobile sensor networks. In / Proceedings of the 4th international conference on distributed computing and internet technology (Vol. 4882, pp. 42鈥?3).
  10. Gonga, A., Landsiedel, O., & Johansson, M. (2011). MobiSense: Power-efficient micro-mobility in wireless sensor networks. In / Proceedings of the 7th IEEE international conference on distributed computing in sensor systems.
  11. Nabi, M., Blagojevic, M., Geilen, M., Basten, T., & Hendriks, T. (2010). MCMAC: An optimized medium access control protocol for mobile clusters in wireless sensor networks. In / 7th annual IEEE communications society conference on sensor mesh and ad hoc communications and networks (SECON) (pp. 1鈥?).
  12. Levis, P., Lee, N., Welsh, M., & Culler, D. (2003). TOSSIM: Accurate and scalable simulation of entire TinyOS applications. In / SenSys鈥?3.
  
• 刊物类别：Engineering
• 刊物主题：Electronic and Computer Engineering
  Signal,Image and Speech Processing
  Processor Architectures
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1572-834X

文摘

Recent boom of mobile applications has become a novel essential characteristic in wireless sensor networks. However, existing MAC protocols mainly focus on static network. To support mobility, some MAC protocols expedite or adjust the schedule frequency of neighbor discovery but suffer from increased latency and energy consumption since they are not adaptive in time. In this paper, we propose a mobile-supporting MAC protocols that the decision to update neighbors of the mobile node is made adaptively in advance. Simulation results demonstrate that the mechanism is efficient to avoid disconnection from mobile node to its neighbors and performs better in terms of main performance parameters: energy efficiency, delay and packet loss compared with the S-MAC, M-MAC and MS-MAC that are popular MAC protocols used in scenarios involving mobile nodes.