Vicarious Viewing Time: Prolonged Response Latencies for Sexually Attractive Targets as a Function of Task- or Stimulus-Specific Processing

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Roland Imhoff (1)
  Alexander F. Schmidt (1)
  Simone Wei? (1)
  Andrew W. Young (2)
  Rainer Banse (1)
  
• 关键词：Viewing time ; Sexual preference ; Indirect measure ; Cognitive processes ; Faking
• 刊名：Archives of Sexual Behavior
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：December 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：41
• 期：6
• 页码：1389-1401
• 全文大小：378KB
• 参考文献：1. Abel, G. G. (1995). / The Abel assessment of interest in paraphilias. Atlanta, GA: Abel Screening, Inc.
  2. Abel, G. G., Huffman, J., Warberg, B., & Holland, C. L. (1998). Visual reaction time and plethysmography as measures of sexual interest in child molesters. / Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, / 10, 81-5. doi:f">10.1177/107906329801000202 .
  3. Abel, G. G., Jordan, A., Hand, C. G., Holland, L. A., & Phipps, A. (2001). Classification models of child molesters utilising the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest? / Child Abuse and Neglect, / 25, 703-18. doi:f">10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00227-7 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00227-7">CrossRef
  4. Banse, R., Schmidt, A. F., & Clarbour, J. (2010). Indirect measures of sexual interest in child sex offenders: A multimethod approach. / Criminal Justice and Behavior, / 37, 319-35. doi:f">10.1177/0093854809357598 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854809357598">CrossRef
  5. Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. / Psychological Science, / 15, 736-44. doi:f">10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00750.x . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00750.x">CrossRef
  6. Glasgow, D. V., Osborne, A., & Croxen, J. (2003). An assessment tool for investigating paedophile sexual interest using viewing time: An application of single case methodology. / British Journal of Learning Disabilities, / 31, 96-02. doi:f">10.1046/j.1468-3156.2003.00180.x . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3156.2003.00180.x">CrossRef
  7. Gress, L. (2005). Viewing time and sexual interest: Another piece in the puzzle. / Journal of Sexual Aggression, / 11, 117-25. doi:f">10.1080/13552600500063666 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13552600500063666">CrossRef
  8. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., & Chaplin, T. C. (1996). Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest among child molesters and heterosexual men. / Behaviour Research and Therapy, / 34, 389-94. doi:f">10.1016/0005-7967(95)00070-4 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(95)00070-4">CrossRef
  9. Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Bernhardt, J., Dierksmeier, A., & Banse, R. (2011). An inkblot for sexual preference: A semantic variant of the Affect Misattribution Procedure. / Cognition and Emotion, / 25, 676-90. doi:f">10.1080/02699931.2010.508260 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.508260">CrossRef
  10. Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Nordsiek, U., Luzar, C., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2010). Viewing time effects revisited: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets under restricted task conditions. / Archives of Sexual Behavior, / 39, 1275-288. doi:f">10.1007/s10508-009-9595-2 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9595-2">CrossRef
  11. Ishai, A. (2007). Sex, beauty and the orbifrontal cortex. / International Journal of Psychophysiology, / 63, 181-85. doi:f">10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.010 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.010">CrossRef
  12. Israel, E., & Strassberg, D. S. (2007). Viewing time as an objective measure of sexual interest in heterosexual men and women. / Archives of Sexual Behavior, / 38, 551-58. doi:f">10.1007/s10508-007-9246-4 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9246-4">CrossRef
  13. Kaine, A., Crim, M., & Mersereau, G. (1988). Faking sexual preference. / Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, / 33, 379-85.
  14. Kalmus, E., & Beech, A. R. (2005). Forensic assessments of sexual interest: A review. / Aggression and Violent Behavior, / 10, 193-17. doi:f">10.1016/j.avb.2003.12.002 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.12.002">CrossRef
  15. Karama, S., Lecours, A. R., Leroux, J.-M., Bourgoin, P., Beaudoin, G., Joubert, S., & Beauregard, M. (2002). Areas of brain activation in males and females during viewing of erotic film excerpts. / Human Brain Mapping, / 16, 1-3. doi:f">10.1002/hbm.10014 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10014">CrossRef
  16. Konopansky, R. J., & Konopansky, A. W. B. (2000). Remaking penile plethysmography. In D. R. Laws, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), / Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 257-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  17. Laws, D. R., & Gress, C. L. Z. (2004). Seeing things differently: The viewing time alternative to penile plethysmography. / Legal and Criminal Psychology, / 9, 183-96. doi:f">10.1348/1355325041719338 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/1355325041719338">CrossRef
  18. Logan, C. (2008). Sexual deviance in females: Psychopathology and theory. In D. R. Laws & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), / Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 486-07). New York: Guilford Press.
  19. Mouras, H., Stoléru, S., Bittoun, J., Glutron, D., Pélégrini-Issac, M., Paradis, A.-L., & Burnod, Y. (2003). Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in healthy men: A functional magnetic resonance imagining study. / NeuroImage, / 20, 855-69. doi:f">10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00408-7 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00408-7">CrossRef
  20. Pacific Psychological Assessment Cooperation. (2004). / The not-real people stimulus set for assessment of sexual interest. Victoria, BC: PPAC.
  21. Ponseti, J., Bosinski, H. A., Wolff, S., Peller, M., Jansen, O., Mehdorn, H. M., -Siebner, H. R. (2006). A functional endophenotype for sexual orientation in humans. / NeuroImage, / 23, 825-33. doi:f">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.002 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.002">CrossRef
  22. Quinsey, V., Ketsetzis, M., Earls, C., & Karamanouikan, A. (1996). Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest. / Ethology and Sociobiology, / 17, 341-54. doi:f">10.1016/S0162-3095(96)00060-X . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0162-3095(96)00060-X">CrossRef
  23. Redouté, J., Stoléru, S., Grégoire, M.-C., Costes, N., Cinotti, L., Lavenne, F., -Pujol, J. F. (2000). Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in human males. / Human Brain Mapping, / 11, 162-77. doi:f">10.1002/1097-0193(200011)11:3<162::AID-HBM30>3.0.CO;2-A . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0193(200011)11:3<162::AID-HBM30>3.0.CO;2-A">CrossRef
  24. Rosenbloom, A. L., & Tanner, J. M. (1998). Misuse of tanner puberty stages to estimate chronologic age. / Pediatrics, / 102, 1494. doi:f">10.1542/peds.102.6.1494 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.102.6.1494">CrossRef
  25. Rosenzweig, S. (1942). The photoscope as an objective device for evaluating sexual interest. / Psychosomatic Medicine, / 4, 150-57.
  26. Safron, A., Barch, B., Bailey, J. M., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Reber, P. J. (2007). Neural correlates of sexual arousal in homosexual and heterosexual men. / Behavioral Neuroscience, / 121, 237-48. doi:f">10.1037/0735-7044.121.2.237 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.121.2.237">CrossRef
  27. Santtila, P., Mokros, A., Viljanen, K., Koivisto, M., Sandnabba, N. K., Zappala, A., & Osterheider, M. (2009). Assessment of sexual interest using a choice reaction time task and priming: A feasibility study. / Legal and Criminological Psychology, / 14, 65-2. doi:f">10.1348/135532507X267040 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/135532507X267040">CrossRef
  28. Stoléru, S., Grégoire, M.-C., Gérard, D., Decety, J., Lafarge, E., Cinotti, L., -Comar, D. (1999). Neuroanatomical correlates of visually evoked sexual arousal in human males. / Archives of Sexual Behavior, / 28, 1-1. doi:f">10.1023/A:1018733420467 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018733420467">CrossRef
  29. Tanner, J. (1978). / Fetus into man: Physical growth from conception to maturity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  30. Thornton, D., & Laws, D. R. (2009). / Cognitive approaches to the assessment of sexual interest in sex offenders. New York: Wiley. doi:f">10.1002/9780470747551 . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470747551">CrossRef
  31. Zamansky, H. S. (1956). A technique for measuring homosexual tendencies. / Journal of Personality, / 24, 436-48. doi:f">10.1111/j.1467-6494.1956.tb01280.x . f="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1956.tb01280.x">CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Roland Imhoff (1)
  Alexander F. Schmidt (1)
  Simone Wei? (1)
  Andrew W. Young (2)
  Rainer Banse (1)
  
  1. Social and Legal Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111, Bonn, Germany
  2. Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK
  
• ISSN：1573-2800

文摘

The amount of time an individual spends gazing at images is longer if the depicted person is sexually appealing. Despite an increasing use of such response latencies as a diagnostic tool in applied forensic settings, the underlying processes that drive the seemingly robust effect of longer response latencies for sexually attractive targets remain unknown. In the current study, two alternative explanations are presented and tested using an adapted viewing time paradigm that disentangled task- and stimulus-specific processes. Heterosexual and homosexual male participants were instructed to rate the sexual attractiveness of target persons differing in sex and sexual maturation from four experimentally assigned perspectives—heterosexual and homosexual perspectives for both sexes. This vicarious viewing time paradigm facilitated the estimation of the independent contributions of task (assigned perspective) and stimuli to viewing time effects. Results showed a large task-based effect as well as a relatively smaller stimulus-based effect. This pattern suggests that, when viewing time measures are used for the assessment of sexual interest, it should be taken into consideration that response latency patterns can be biased by judging images from a selected perspective.