Researchers profile, co-authorship pattern and knowledge organization in information science in Brazil

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Cristina Gomes de Souza (1)
  Marta Lúcia Azevedo Ferreira (1)
  
• 关键词：Information science ; Brazilian science ; Research activity ; Researchers profile ; Knowledge organization ; 62Q05 ; I2 ; I20
• 刊名：Scientometrics
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：May 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：95
• 期：2
• 页码：673-687
• 全文大小：539KB
• 参考文献：1. Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis. / Journal of Management Studies, / 43(5), 957-83. CrossRef
  2. Aharony, N. (2012). Library and information science research areas: a content analysis of articles from the top 10 journals 2007-. / Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, / 44(1), 27-5. CrossRef
  3. Ardanuy, J. (2012). Scientific collaboration in library and information science viewed through the web of knowledge: the Spanish case. / Scientometrics, / 90(3), 877-90. CrossRef
  4. Bufrem, L. S., Gabriel Junior, R. F., & Gon?alves, V. (2010). Práticas de co-autoria no processo de comunica??o científica na pós-gradua??o em ciência da informa??o no Brasil. / Inf. Inf., / 15, 111-30. CrossRef
  5. De Souza, C. G., & Barbastefano, R. G. (2011). Knowledge diffusion and collaboration networks on life cycle assessment. / International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, / 16(6), 561-68. CrossRef
  6. Erdmann, A. L., & Lanzoni, G. M. M. (2008). Características dos grupos de pesquisa da enfermagem brasileira certificados pelo CNPq de 2005 a 2007. / Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm, / 12(2), 316-22. CrossRef
  7. Fernandes, W. R., Cendón, B. V., & Araújo, C. A. A. (2011). Ciência da informa??o e áreas correlatas: um estudo de caso na Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. / Brazilian Journal of Information Science, / 5(1), 3-6.
  8. Foucault, M. (1966). / Les Mots et les Choses. Une Arquéologie des Sciences Humaines. Paris: Gallimard.
  9. Gl?nzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-998): a bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. / Library Trends, / 50(3), 461-73.
  10. Gomes, M.Y.F.S. de F. (2009). Desafios Atuais da Ciência da Informa??o no Brasil. / Perspectivas em Ciência da Informa??o, 14(3), 190-05.
  11. Hawkins, D.T. (2001). Bibliometrics of electronic journals in information science. / Information Research, 7(1). http://InformationR.net/ir/7-1/paper120.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2012.
  12. Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in scientometrics. / Scientometrics, / 75(2), 189-02. CrossRef
  13. Huang, M. H., & Chang, Y. W. (2011). A study of interdisciplinarity in information science: using direct citation and co-authorship analysis. / Journal of Information Science, / 37(4), 369-78. CrossRef
  14. Huang, M. H., & Chang, Y. W. (2012). A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science. / Scientometrics, / 91(3), 789-03. CrossRef
  15. Johnson, I., & Cano, V. (2008). Electronic publishing in librarianship and information science in Latin America—a step towards development? / Information Research, 13(1). http://InformationR.net/ir/13-1/paper331.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2012.
  16. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? / Research Policy, / 26, 1-8. CrossRef
  17. Kuhn, T. S. (1997). / A estrutura das revolu??es científicas. S?o Paulo: Perspectiva.
  18. Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. / Journal of Political Economy, / 108(3), 632-62. CrossRef
  19. Lane, J. (2010). Let’s make science metrics more scientific. / Nature, / 464, 488-89. CrossRef
  20. Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred years. / Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, / 63(5), 997-016. CrossRef
  21. Leite, P., Mugnaini, R., & Leta, J. (2011). A new indicator for international visibility: exploring Brazilian scientific community. / Scientometrics, / 88(1), 311-19. CrossRef
  22. Leta, J., Gl?nzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 2: sectoral and institutional research profiles. / Scientometrics, / 67(1), 87-05. CrossRef
  23. Marteleto, R. M. (2009). A pesquisa em Ciência da Informa??o no Brasil: marcos institucionais, cenários e perspectivas. / Perspectivas em Ciência da Informa??o, / 14(especial number), 19-0.
  24. MCTI—Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. (2012). Indicadores—Compara??es internacionais. dex.php/content/view/740.html?execview" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.mcti.gov.br/index.php/content/view/740.html?execview. Accessed 8 Aug 2012.
  25. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. / Scientometrics, / 51(1), 203-22. CrossRef
  26. Mukherjee, B. (2010). Assessing Asian scholarly research in library and information science: a quantitative view as reflected in web of knowledge. / The Journal of Academic Librarianship, / 36(1), 90-01. CrossRef
  27. Pinheiro, L. V. R. (2000). Infra-estrutura da pesquisa em Ciência da Informa??o no Brasil. / DataGramaZero—Revista de Ciência da Informa??o, / 1(6), 1-0.
  28. Pinheiro, L.V.R. (2006). A ciência da Informa??o: desdobramentos disciplinares, interdisciplinares e transdisciplinares. In: Gonzàles de Gómez, M.N., Orrico, E.G.D. (Org.). / Políticas de memória e informa??o: reflexos na organiza??o do conhecimento (pp. 111-41). Natal: UFRN Edit.
  29. Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. / Scientometrics, / 72(1), 117-47. CrossRef
  30. Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. / Scientometrics, / 81(3), 719-45. CrossRef
  31. Prebor, G. (2010). Analysis of the interdisciplinary nature of library and information science. / Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, / 42(4), 256-67. CrossRef
  32. Smith, L. (1992). Interdisciplinarity: approaches to understanding library and information science as an interdisciplinary field. In: P. Vakkari & B. Cronin (Eds.), / Conceptions of library and Information Science: historical, empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 253-67). London: Taylor Graham.
  33. Tang, R. (2004). Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science. / Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, / 41(1), 54-3. CrossRef
  34. Vanz, S.A. de S., & Stump, I.R.C. (2010). Colabora??o científica: revis?o teórico-conceitual. / Perspectivas em Ciência da Informa??o, 15(2), 42-5.
  35. Vasconcelos, S. M. R., Sorenson, M. M., & Leta, J. (2009). A new indicator for the assessment of Science & technology research? / Scientometrics, / 80(1), 217-30. CrossRef
  36. Vilan Filho, J. L., de Souza, H. B., & Mueller, S. (2008). Artigos de periódicos científicos das áreas de informa??o no Brasil: evolu??o da produ??o e da autoria múltipla. / Perspectivas em Ciência da Informa??o, / 13(2), 2-7. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Cristina Gomes de Souza (1)
  Marta Lúcia Azevedo Ferreira (1)
  
  1. Federal Centre for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca, CEFET/RJ, Av. Maracan?, 229, Bloco E, 5o. Andar, Sala E506, DIPPG, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20271-110, Brazil
  
• ISSN：1588-2861

文摘

This paper aimed to present the profile of the researchers, the pattern of scientific collaboration and the knowledge organization in the area of information science in Brazil. The study covered sex differences, skills by region and type of institution, academic formation, indicators of productivity, relations of co-authorship, interactions with other fields of knowledge, and sectors of application of the researches developed in the area. The survey, covering the period 2000-010, was based on information from the curricula vitae of the researchers with Research Productivity Grant funded by a government agency and from the Directory of Research Group of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development. The results revealed that the majority of the researchers are women, both in research and postgraduate; there is a significant regional asymmetry; the studies are concentrated in public universities; the papers are published mainly in national journals with open access; the scientific production follows the same pattern of the areas of humanities, social sciences, and linguistics, literature and arts; there is a tendency of increasing the incidence and extent of co-authored papers; there is interaction with other 20 areas of knowledge, which are directly or indirectly connected, forming a single component that comprises all of them; and ‘information and S&T management-followed by ‘education-are the main sectors of application of the studies developed by the Brazilian researchers. The study therefore showed an overview of this scientific community seeking to contribute to a better understanding of its characteristics and specificities.