mHealth Physical Activity Intervention: A Randomized Pilot Study in Physically Inactive Pregnant Women

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：JiWon Choi ; Ji hyeon Lee ; Eric Vittinghoff…
• 关键词：Physical activity ; Pregnancy ; Mobile health
• 刊名：Maternal and Child Health Journal
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：May 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：20
• 期：5
• 页码：1091-1101
• 全文大小：630 KB
• 参考文献：1.Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (2008). Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washington (DC): United States Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS).
  2.Evenson, K. R., Savitz, D. A., & Huston, S. L. (2004). Leisure-time physical activity among pregnancy women in the US. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 18, 400–407.CrossRef PubMed
  3.ACOG. (2002). Exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 267. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 99, 171–173.
  4.Davies, G., Wolfe, L., Mottola, M., et al. (2003). Joint SOGC/CSEP clinical practice guideline: Exercise in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 28, 330–341.CrossRef PubMed
  5.(2006). Impact of physical activity during pregnancy and postpartum on chronic disease risk. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 38 (5), 989–1006.
  6.Mudd, L. M., Owe, K. M., Mottola, M. F., et al. (2013). Health benefits of physical activity during pregnancy: An international perspective. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 45(2), 268–277.CrossRef PubMed
  7.Pearce, E. E., Evenson, K. R., Downs, D. S., et al. (2013). Strategies to promote physical activity during pregnancy. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 7(1), 38–50.CrossRef
  8.Noah, J. A., Spierer, D. K., Gu, J., Bronner, S., et al. (2013). Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 37, 456–462.CrossRef
  9.Weiss, B., Mays, M. Z., Martz, W., et al. (2005). Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The newest vistal sign. The Annals of Family Medicine, 3(6), 514–522.CrossRef PubMed
  10.ACOG Committee Obstetric Practice. (2002). ACOG Committee opinion. Number 267, January 2002: Exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 99, 171–173.CrossRef
  11.Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., et al. (1980). Tests of generality of self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 39–66.CrossRef
  12.USDHHS. Stay Active and Be Fit! A guide to fitness and activity fundamentals. www.​presidentschalle​nge.​org/​pdf/​getfit.​pdf .
  13.Institute of Medicine. (2009). Weight gain during pregnancy: Reexamining the guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  14.Taylor-Piliae, R. E., Norton, L. C., Haskell, W. L., et al. (2006). Validation of a new brief physical activity survey among men and women aged 60–69 years. American Journal of Epidemiology, 164(6), 598–606.CrossRef PubMed
  15.Marcus, B. H., & Forsyth, L. (2009). Motivating people to be physically active (2nd ed.). IL: Human Kinetics, Urbana-Champaign.
  16.Craig, C. L., Tudor-Locke, C., Cragg, S., et al. (2010). Process and treatment of pedometer data collection for youth: The Canadian physical activity levels among youth study. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 42(3), 430–435.CrossRef PubMed
  17.Mutrie, N., Doolin, O., Fitzsimons, C. F., et al. (2012). Increasing older adults’ walking through primary care: Results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Family Practice, 29(6), 633–642. doi:10.​1093/​fampra/​cms038 .CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  18.Marcus, B. H., Selby, V. C., Niaura, R. S., et al. (1992). Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63(1), 60–66.CrossRef PubMed
  19.Sallis, J. F., Grossman, R. M., Pinski, R. B., et al. (1987). The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Preventive Medicine, 16(6), 825–836.CrossRef PubMed
  20.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Barrier to being active. www.​cdc.​gov/​nccdphp/​dnpa/​physical/​life/​barriers_​quiz.​pdf .
  21.Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.CrossRef
  22.Wallace, A. M., Boyer, D. B., Dan, A., et al. (1986). Aerobic exercise, maternal self-esteem, and physical discomforts during pregnancy. Journal of Nurse Midwifery, 31(6), 255–262.CrossRef PubMed
  23.Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., et al. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381.CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  24.Evenson, K. R., Savitz, D. A., & Huston, S. L. (2004). Leisure-time physical activity among pregnant women in the US. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 18, 400–407.CrossRef PubMed
  25.Fukuoka, Y., Vittinghoff, E., Jong, S. S., et al. (2010). Innovation to motivation-Pilot study of a mobile phone intervention to increase physical activity among sedentary women. Preventive Medicine, 51, 287–289.CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  26.Fukuoka, Y., Gay, C. L., Joiner, K. L., et al. (2015). A novel diabetes prevention intervention using a mobile app: A randomized controlled trial with overweight adults at risk. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(2), 223–237.CrossRef PubMed
  27.Evenson, K. R., Moos, M. K., Carrier, K., et al. (2008). Perceived barriers to physical activity among pregnant women. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 13(3), 364–375.CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
  28.Symons-Downs, D., & Hausenblas, H. A. (2004). Women’s exercise beliefs and behaviors during their pregnancy and postpartum. Journal of Midwifery and Womens Health, 49(2), 138–144.
  29.Fox, K. R. (1999). The influence of physical activity on mental well-being. Public Health Nutrition, 2(Supplement 3a), 411–418.PubMed
  30.Fjeldsoe, B. S., Miller, Y. D., & Marshall, A. L. (2010). MobileMums: A randomized controlled trial of an SMS-based physical activity intervention. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 39, 101–111.CrossRef PubMed
  31.Fjeldsoe, B. S., Miller, Y. D., & Graves, N. (2015). Randomized controlled trial of an improved version of MobileMums, an intervention for increasing physical activity in women with young children. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 5(4), e007226. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2014-007226 .
  
• 作者单位：JiWon Choi (1)
  Ji hyeon Lee (2)
  Eric Vittinghoff (3)
  Yoshimi Fukuoka (4)
  
  1. Institute for Health and Aging/Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 340, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA
  2. Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
  3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  4. Department of Physiological Nursing/Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  
• 刊物主题：Public Health; Sociology, general; Population Economics; Pediatrics; Gynecology; Maternal and Child Health;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1573-6628

文摘

Introduction Physical inactivity is prevalent in pregnant women, and innovative strategies to promote physical activity are strongly needed. The purpose of the study was to test a 12-week mobile health (mHealth) physical activity intervention for feasibility and potential efficacy. Methods Participants were recruited between December 2012 and February 2014 using diverse recruitment methods. Thirty pregnant women between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation were randomized to an intervention (mobile phone app plus Fitbit) or a control (Fitbit) group. Both conditions targeted gradual increases in physical activity. The mHealth intervention included daily messages and a mobile phone activity diary with automated feedback and self-monitoring systems. Results On monthly average, 4 women were screened for initial eligibility by telephone and 2.5 were randomized. Intervention participants had a 1096 ± 1898 step increase in daily steps compared to an increase of 259 ± 1604 steps in control participants at 12 weeks. The change between groups in weekly mean steps per day during the 12-week study period was not statistically significant (p = 0.38). The intervention group reported lower perceived barrier to being active, lack of energy, than the control group at 12-week visit (p = 0.02). The rates of responding to daily messages and using the daily diary through the mobile app declined during the 12 week study period. Discussion It was difficult to recruit and randomize inactive women who wanted to increase physical activity during pregnancy. Pregnant women who were motivated to increase physical activity might find using mobile technologies in assessing and promoting PA acceptable. Possible reasons for the non-significant treatment effect of the mHealth intervention on physical activity are discussed. Public awareness of safety and benefits of physical activity during pregnancy should be promoted. Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier NCT01461707.