The revealing glance: Eye gaze behavior to concealed information

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Charlotte Schwedes (1)
  Dirk Wentura (1)
  
• 关键词：Eye movements ; Concealed information test ; Guilty knowledge test ; Fixation duration ; Familiarity ; Recollection
• 刊名：Memory & Cognition
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：May 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：40
• 期：4
• 页码：642-651
• 全文大小：284KB
• 参考文献：1. Allen, J. J., Iacono, W. G., & Danielson, K. D. (1992). The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: A methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences. / Psychophysiology, 29, 504鈥?22. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb02024.x CrossRef
  2. Althoff, R. R., & Cohen, N. J. (1999). Eye-movement-based memory effect: A reprocessing effect in face perception. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 997鈥?010. CrossRef
  3. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Dolev, K. (1996). Psychophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: Effects of mental countermeasures. / Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 273鈥?81. CrossRef
  4. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A meta-analytic review. / Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131鈥?51. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.131 CrossRef
  5. Bentin, S., & Deouell, L. Y. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. / Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 35鈥?4. doi:10.1080/026432900380472 CrossRef
  6. Bradley, M. T., MacLaren, V. V., & Carle, S. B. (1996). Deception and nondeception in guilty knowledge and guilty actions polygraph tests. / Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 153鈥?60. CrossRef
  7. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. / British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305鈥?27. CrossRef
  8. Cohen, J. (1977). / Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Revth ed.). New York: Academic Press.
  9. Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. / Memory & Cognition, 28, 923鈥?38. doi:10.3758/BF03209340 CrossRef
  10. Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (鈥渓ie detection鈥? with event-related brain potentials. / Psychophysiology, 28, 531鈥?47. CrossRef
  11. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. / Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175鈥?91. doi:10.3758/BF03193146 CrossRef
  12. Fox, E. (2004). Maintenance or capture of attention in anxiety-relates biases? In J. Yiend (Ed.), / Cognition, emotion and psychopathology: Theoretical, empirical and clinical directions (pp. 86鈥?05). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
  13. Hannula, D. E., Althoff, R. R., Warren, D. E., Riggs, L., Cohen, N. J., & Ryan, J. D. (2010). Worth a glance: Using eye movements to investigate the cognitive neuroscience of memory. / Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 166. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00166 CrossRef
  14. Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. / Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 124鈥?38. CrossRef
  15. Jemel, B., Schuller, A.-M., & Goffaux, V. (2010). Characterizing the spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural events occurring prior to and up to overt recognition of famous faces. / Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2289鈥?305. CrossRef
  16. Johnson, R. J. (1995). Event-related potential insights into the neurobiology of memory systems. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), / Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 10, pp. 135鈥?63). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  17. Johnston, R. A., & Edmonds, A. J. (2009). Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: A review. / Memory, 17, 577鈥?96. doi:10.1080/09658210902976969 CrossRef
  18. Langleben, D. D., Schroeder, L., Maldjian, J. A., Gur, R. C., McDonald, S., Ragland, J. D., . . . Childress, A. R. (2002). Brain activity during simulated deception: An event-related functional magnetic resonance study. / NeuroImage, / 15, 727鈥?32
  19. Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. / Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385鈥?88. CrossRef
  20. Lykken, D. T. (1960). The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking. / Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 258鈥?62. CrossRef
  21. Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detector industry. / American Psychologist, 29, 725鈥?39. doi:10.1037/h0037441 CrossRef
  22. Lykken, D. T. (1998). / A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: Plenum.
  23. MacLaren, V. V. (2001). A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test. / Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 674鈥?83. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.674 CrossRef
  24. Rosenfeld, J. P. (2011). P300 in detecting concealed information. In B. Verschuere, G. Ben Shakhar, & E. Meijer (Eds.), / Memory detection: Theory and application of the Concealed Information Test (pp. 63鈥?9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Rugg, M. D. (1995). ERP studies of memory. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), / Electrophysiology of mind (pp. 132鈥?70). New York: Oxford University Press.
  26. Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Birch, C. S., & Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. / Nature, 392, 595鈥?98. CrossRef
  27. Ryan, J. D., Hannula, D. E., & Cohen, N. J. (2007). The obligatory effects of memory on eye movements. / Memory, 15, 508鈥?25. CrossRef
  28. Seymour, T. L., & Kerlin, J. R. (2008). Successful detection of verbal and visual concealed knowledge using an RT-based paradigm. / Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 475鈥?90. doi:10.1002/acp.1375 CrossRef
  29. Seymour, T. L., Seifert, C. M., Shafto, M. G., & Mosmann, A. L. (2000). Using response time measures to assess 鈥済uilty knowledge. / Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 30鈥?7. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.30 CrossRef
  30. Stacey, P. C., Walker, S., & Underwood, J. D. (2005). Face processing and familiarity: Evidence from eye-movement data. / British Journal of Psychology, 96, 407鈥?22. CrossRef
  31. Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A., & Collins, D. (2006). The activation of pre-existing and acquired face representations: The N250 ERP as an index of face familiarity. / Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1488鈥?497. CrossRef
  32. Verschuere, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Meijer, E. (2011). / Memory detection: Theory and application of the Concealed Information Test. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Degrootte, T., & Rosseel, Y. (2010). Detecting concealed information with reaction times: Validity and comparison with the polygraph. / Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 991鈥?002. doi:10.1002/acp.1601 CrossRef
  34. Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Detecting concealed information in less than a second: Response latency-based measures. In B. Verschuere, G. Ben Shakhar, & E. Meijer (Eds.), / Memory detection: Theory and application of the Concealed Information Test (pp. 46鈥?2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Webb, S. J., Jones, E. J. H., Merkle, K., Murias, M., Greenson, J., Richards, T., . . . Dawson, G. (2010). Response to familiar faces, newly familiar faces, and novel faces as assessed by ERPs is intact in adults with autism spectrum disorders. / International Journal of Psychophysiology, / 77, 106鈥?17
  36. Woodruff, C. C., Hayama, H. R., & Rugg, M. D. (2006). Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. / Brain Research, 1100, 125鈥?35. CrossRef
  37. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30聽years of research. / Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441鈥?17. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Charlotte Schwedes (1)
  Dirk Wentura (1)
  
  1. Department of Psychology, University of Saarland, Campus, A2 4, 66123, Saarbr眉cken, Germany
  

文摘

We explored the usefulness of eye fixation durations as a dependent measure in a concealed knowledge test, drawing on Ryan, Hannula, and Cohen (2007), who found eye fixations on a familiar face to be longer than fixations on an unknown face. However, in their study, participants always had to select the known face out of three faces; thus, recognition and response intention could not be differentiated. In the experimental phase of our experiment, participants saw six faces per trial and had to select one of them. We had three conditions: In the first, one of the six faces was a known face, and the participants had to conceal that knowledge and select another face (concealed display); in another, one of the six faces was a known face, and the participants had to select that face (revealed display); or finally, all six faces were unknown, and participants had to select any of the six faces (neutral display). Using fixation durations as the dependent measure, we found a pure and early recognition effect; that is, fixations on the concealed faces (known but not selected) were longer than fixations on the nonselected unknown target faces in the neutral display. In addition, we found a response intention effect; that is, fixation durations on the selected known faces were longer than those on concealed faces (known but not selected).