Spatial mislocalization as a consequence of sequential coding of stimuli

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Heinz-Werner Priess (1)
  Ingrid Scharlau (2)
  Stefanie I. Becker (3)
  Ulrich Ansorge (1) (4)
  
• 关键词：Attention ; Visual illusions ; Prior entry
• 刊名：Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：February 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：74
• 期：2
• 页码：365-378
• 全文大小：431KB
• 参考文献：1. Ansorge, U., Carbone, E., Becker, S. I., & Turatto, M. (2010). Attentional capture by motion onsets is spatially imprecise. / European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 62-05. doi:10.1080/09541440902733190 CrossRef
  2. Atchley, P., Kramer, A. F., & Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: Attentional set for perceptual transients. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 594-06. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.594 CrossRef
  3. Baldo, M. V. C., Kihara, A. H., Namba, J., & Klein, S. A. (2002). Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli. / Perception, 31, 17-0. doi:10.1068/p3302 CrossRef
  4. Baldo, M. V. C., & Klein, S. A. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift? / Nature, 378, 565-66. CrossRef
  5. Bashinski, H. S., & Bacharach, V. R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations. / Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 241-48. CrossRef
  6. Becker, S. I., Ansorge, U., & Turatto, M. (2009). Saccades reveal that allocentric coding of the moving object causes mislocalization in the flash-lag effect. / Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1313-324. doi:10.3758/APP.71.6.1313 CrossRef
  7. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. / Spatial Vision, 10, 433-36. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357 CrossRef
  8. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ogmen, H. (2006). / Visual masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Bridgeman, B., & Leff, S. (1979). Interaction of stimulus size and retinal eccentricity in metacontrast masking. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 101-09. CrossRef
  10. Carbone, E., & Ansorge, U. (2008). Investigating the contribution of metacontrast to the Fr?hlich effect for size. / Acta Psychologica, 128, 361-67. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.008 CrossRef
  11. Chappell, M., Hine, T. J., Acworth, C., & Hardwick, D. R. (2006). Attention “capture-by the flash-lag flash. / Vision Research, 46, 3205-213. CrossRef
  12. Dunlap, K. (1910). The complication experiment and related phenomena. / Psychological Review, 17, 157-91. doi:10.1037/h0073064 CrossRef
  13. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000a). Flash-lag effect: Differential latency, not postdiction. Response to Patel et?al., / Science, / 290, 1051a.
  14. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000b). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. / Science, 287, 2036-038. doi:10.1126/science.287.5460.2036 CrossRef
  15. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2007). Motion signals bias localization judgments: A unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich effects. / Journal of Vision, / 7(4), 3:1-2. doi:10.1167/7.4.3
  16. Enns, J. T., Brehaut, J. C., & Shore, D. I. (1999). The duration of a brief event in the mind’s eye. / The Journal of General Psychology, 126, 355-72. CrossRef
  17. Fr?hlich, F. W. (1929). / Die Empfindungszeit—Ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der Zeit-, Raum- und Bewegungsempfindung [The sensation time—a contribution to the lore of time, space and motion sensation]. Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer.
  18. Gauch, A., & Kerzel, D. (2009). Contributions of visible persistence and perceptual set to the flash-lag effect: Focusing on flash onset abolishes the illusion. / Vision Research, 49, 2983-991. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.018 CrossRef
  19. Kerzel, D. (2010). The Fr?hlich effect: Historical notes and relation to the flash-lag, current theories and reconciliation with the onset repulsion effect. In R. Nijhawan & B. Khurana (Eds.), / Space and time in perception and action (pp. 321-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
  20. Kirschfeld, K., & Kammer, T. (1999). The Fr?hlich effect: A consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. / Vision Research, 39, 3702-709. CrossRef
  21. Mattes, S., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a brief stimulus. / Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1305-317. doi:10.3758/BF03207993 CrossRef
  22. Müsseler, J., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fr?hlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. / Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 683-95. doi:10.3758/BF03206055 CrossRef
  23. Müsseler, J., & Neumann, O. (1992). Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (tandem effect): Evidence for an attention-shifting model. / Psychological Research, 54, 246-66. CrossRef
  24. Müsseler, J., Stork, S., & Kerzel, D. (2008). Localising the onset of moving stimuli with a pointing task and a relative judgment task. / Vision Research, 48, 611-17. CrossRef
  25. Neumann, O., & Niepel, M. (2004). Timing of perception and perception of time. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schr?ger, & H. Müller (Eds.), / Psychophysics beyond sensation (pp. 245-79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  26. Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. / Nature, 370, 256-57. CrossRef
  27. Nijhawan, R., Watanabe, K., Khurana, B., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Compensation of neural delays in visual–motor behaviour: No evidence for shorter afferent delays for visual motion. / Visual Cognition, 1, 275-98. CrossRef
  28. ??men, H., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Camuz, K. (2004). Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect. / Vision Research, 44, 2109-128. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.04.003 CrossRef
  29. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. / Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-5. doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 CrossRef
  30. Priess, H.-W. (2011). Personal CMS: Home [Sofware demo]. Retrieved April 13, 2011, from priessh9/jumpingDemo.html" class="a-plus-plus">http://ppcms.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/usermounts/priessh9/jumpingDemo.html
  31. Purushothaman, G., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Ogmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential visual latency. / Nature, 396, 424. doi:10.1038/24766 CrossRef
  32. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of premotor theory of attention. / Neuropsychologia, 25, 31-0. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(87)90041-8 CrossRef
  33. Scharlau, I. (2002). Leading, but not trailing, primes influence temporal order perception: Further evidence for an attentional account of perceptual latency priming. / Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1346-360. CrossRef
  34. Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming. / Vision Research, 43, 1351-363. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00141-X CrossRef
  35. Scharlau, I., Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2006). Latency facilitation in temporal-order judgments: Time course of facilitation as a function of judgment type. / Acta Psychologica, 122, 129-59. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.10.006 CrossRef
  36. Sheth, B. R., Nijhawan, R., & Shimojo, S. (2000). Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones. / Nature Neuroscience, 3, 489-95. doi:10.1038/74865 CrossRef
  37. Shore, D. I., Spence, C., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Visual prior entry. / Psychological Science, 12, 205-12. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00337 CrossRef
  38. Stelmach, L. B., & Herdman, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 539-50. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.539 CrossRef
  39. Titchener, E. M. (1908). / Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. New York: Macmillan. CrossRef
  40. von Helmholtz, H. (1894). über den Ursprung der richtigen Deutung unserer Sinneseindrücke [About the origin of the correct interpretation of our sensory impressions]. / Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Dritter Band [Scientific proceedings, third volume]. Leipzig, Germany: Barth.
  41. Whitney, D., Murakami, I., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. / Vision Research, 40, 137-49. CrossRef
  42. Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit. / Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1293-313. CrossRef
  43. Wundt, W. (1896). / Grundri? der Psychologie [Compendium of psychology]. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.
  44. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-21. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.601 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Heinz-Werner Priess (1)
  Ingrid Scharlau (2)
  Stefanie I. Becker (3)
  Ulrich Ansorge (1) (4)
  
  1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010, Wien, Austria
  2. Department of Cultural Sciences, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
  3. School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane St Lucia, Australia
  4. Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
  

文摘

In three experiments, we tested whether sequentially coding two visual stimuli can create a spatial misperception of a visual moving stimulus. In Experiment 1, we showed that a spatial misperception, the flash-lag effect, is accompanied by a similar temporal misperception of first perceiving the flash and only then a change of the moving stimulus, when in fact the two events were exactly simultaneous. In Experiment 2, we demonstrated that when the spatial misperception of a flash-lag effect is absent, the temporal misperception is also absent. In Experiment 3, we extended these findings and showed that if the stimulus conditions require coding first a flash and subsequently a nearby moving stimulus, a spatial flash-lag effect is found, with the position of the moving stimulus being misperceived as shifted in the direction of its motion, whereas this spatial misperception is reversed so that the moving stimulus is misperceived as shifted in a direction opposite to its motion when the conditions require coding first the moving stimulus and then the flash. Together, the results demonstrate that sequential coding of two stimuli can lead to a spatial misperception whose direction can be predicted from the order of coding the moving object versus the flash. We propose an attentional sequential-coding explanation for the flash-lag effect and discuss its explanatory power with respect to related illusions (e.g., the Fr?hlich effect) and other explanations.