Biochar increased water holding capacity but accelerated organic carbon leaching from a sloping farmland soil in China
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Chen Liu ; Honglan Wang ; Xiangyu Tang…
- 关键词：Biochar ; Soil ; Pore size distribution ; Water holding capacity ; DOC ; EEM fluorescence
- 刊名：Environmental Science and Pollution Research
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：January 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：23
- 期：2
- 页码：995-1006
- 全文大小：1,535 KB
- 参考文献：Aguilar L, Thibodeaux LJ (2005) Kinetics of peat soil dissolved organic carbon release from bed sediment to water. Part 1. Laboratory simulation. Chemosphere 58:1309–1318CrossRef
Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE et al (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33CrossRef
Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM et al (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crop Res 111:81–84CrossRef
Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18CrossRef
Boyer JN, Groffman PM (1996) Bioavailability of water extractable organic carbon fractions in forest and agricultural soil profiles. Soil Biol Biochem 28:783–790CrossRef
Brodowski S, Amelung W, Haumaier L et al (2005) Morphological and chemical properties of black carbon in physical soil fractions as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Geoderma 128:116–129CrossRef
Case SDC, McNamara NP, Reay DS et al (2013) Can biochar reduce soil greenhouse gas emissions from a Miscanthus bioenergy crop? GCB Bioenergy 6:76–89CrossRef
Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer JA et al (2003) Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 37:5701–5710CrossRef
Chow AT, Tanji KK, Gao S et al (2006) Temperature, water content and wet-dry cycle effects on DOC production and carbon mineralization in agricultural peat soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38:477–488CrossRef
Cornelis WM, Khlosi M, Hartmann R et al (2005) Comparison of unimodal analytical expressions for the soil-water retention curve. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1902–1911CrossRef
Dane JH, Hopmans JW, Romano N et al (2002) Soil water retention and storage-laboratory methods. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis part 4-physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 675–720
Dexter AR (2004) Soil physical quality. Part I: theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120:201–214CrossRef
Dugan E, Verhoef A, Robinson S et al (2010) Bio-char from sawdust, maize stover and charcoal: Impact on water holding capacities (WHC) of three soils from Ghana. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil solutions for a changing world, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 8:1–6
Gerrity D, Gamage S, Jones D et al (2012) Development of surrogate correlation models to predict trace organic contaminant oxidation and microbial inactivation during ozonation. Water Res 46:6257–6272CrossRef
Greeg SJ, Sing KSW (1982) Adsorption, surface area, and porosity. Academic Press, London
Guggenberger G, Rodionov A, Shibistova O et al (2008) Storage and mobility of black carbon in permafrost soils of the forest tundra ecotone in Northern Siberia. Glob Chang Biol 14:1367–1381CrossRef
Henderson RK, Baker A, Murphy KR et al (2009) Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: a review. Water Res 43:863–881CrossRef
Hernandez-Ruiz S, Abrell L, Wickramasekara S et al (2012) Quantifying PPCP interaction with dissolved organic matter in aqueous solution: combined use of fluorescence quenching and tandem mass spectrometry. Water Res 46:943–954CrossRef
Hockaday WC, Grannas AM, Kim S et al (2007) The transformation and mobility of charcoal in a fire-impacted watershed. Geochem Cosmochim Acta 71:3432–3445CrossRef
Jamieson T, Sager E, Guéguen C (2014) Characterization of biochar-derived dissolved organic matter using UV-visible adsorption and excitation-emission fluorescence spectroscopies. Chemosphere 103:197–204CrossRef
Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M et al (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187CrossRef
Jien SH, Wang CS (2013) Effects of biochar on soil properties and erosion potential in a highly weathered soil. Catena 110:225–233CrossRef
Karhu K, Mattila T, Bergström I et al (2011) Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity-results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:309–313CrossRef
Kookana RS (2010) The role of biochar in modifying the environmental fate, bioavailability, and efficacy of pesticides in soils: a review. Aust J Soil Res 48:627–637CrossRef
Korshin GV, Wu WW, Benjamin MM et al (2002) Correlations between differential absorbance and the formation of individual DBPs. Water Res 36:3273–3282CrossRef
Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD et al (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:443–449CrossRef
Lee Y, Park J, Ryu C et al (2013) Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500 °C. Bioresour Technol 148:196–201CrossRef
Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems-a review. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 11:403–427
Lu SG, Sun FF, Zong YT (2014) Effect of rice husk biochar and coal fly ash on some physical properties of expansive clayey soil (Vertisol). Catena 114:37–44CrossRef
Mukherjee A, Zimmerman AR (2013) Organic carbon and nutrient release from a range of laboratory-produced biochars and biochar-soil mixtures. Geoderma 193–194:122–130CrossRef
Mukherjee A, Zimmerman AR, Harris W (2001) Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma 163:247–255CrossRef
Nelissen V, Ruysschaert G, Manka'Abusi D et al (2015) Impact of a woody biochar on properties of a sandy loam soil and spring barley during a two-year field experiment. Eur J Agron 62:65–78CrossRef
Peake LR, Tang X, Reid BJ (2014) Quantifying the influence of biochar on the physical and hydrological properties of dissimilar soils. Geoderma 235–236:182–190CrossRef
Reynolds WD, Drury CF, Yang XM et al (2007) Land management effects on the near-surface physical quality of a clay loam soil. Soil Tillage Res 96:316–330CrossRef
Soil Science Glossary Terms Committee (2008) Glossary of Soil Science Terms 2008. Soil Science Society of America, Madison
Stevenson FJ, Cole MA (1996) Cycles of soil: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, micronutrients (second ed.). Wiley, New York
Tammeorg P, Simojoki A, Mäkelä P et al (2014) Biochar application to a fertile sandy clay loam in boreal conditions: effects on soil properties and yield formation of wheat, turnip rape and faba bean. Plant Soil 374:89–107CrossRef
van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898CrossRef
Veksha A, McLaughlin H, Layzell DB et al (2014) Pyrolysis of wood to biochar: increasing yield while maintaining microporosity. Bioresour Technol 153:173–179CrossRef
Vomocil J, Flocker W (1965) Degradation of structure of Yolo loam by compaction. Soil Sci Soc Am J 29:7–12CrossRef
Washburn EW (1921) The dynamics of capillarity flow. Phys Rev 17:273–283CrossRef
Zhang J, You CF (2013) Water holding capacity and absorption properties of wood chars. Energy Fuel 27:2643–2648CrossRef - 作者单位：Chen Liu (1)
Honglan Wang (1)
Xiangyu Tang (1)
Zhuo Guan (1)
Brian J. Reid (2)
Anushka Upamali Rajapaksha (3)
Yong Sik Ok (3)
Hui Sun (4)
1. Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Processes and Ecological Regulation, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China
2. School of Environmental Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, UK
3. Korea Biochar Research Center and Department of Biological Environment, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
4. College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China - 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
- 刊物主题：Environment
Environment
Atmospheric Protection, Air Quality Control and Air Pollution
Waste Water Technology, Water Pollution Control, Water Management and Aquatic Pollution
Industrial Pollution Prevention - 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
- ISSN：1614-7499
文摘
A hydrologically contained field study, to assess biochar (produced from mixed crop straws) influence upon soil hydraulic properties and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leaching, was conducted on a loamy soil (entisol). The soil, noted for its low plant-available water and low soil organic matter, is the most important arable soil type in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River catchment, China. Pore size distribution characterization (by N2 adsorption, mercury intrusion, and water retention) showed that the biochar had a tri-modal pore size distribution. This included pores with diameters in the range of 0.1–10 μm that can retain plant-available water. Comparison of soil water retention curves between the control (0) and the biochar plots (16 t ha−1 on dry weight basis) demonstrated biochar amendment to increase soil water holding capacity. However, significant increases in DOC concentration of soil pore water in both the plough layer and the undisturbed subsoil layer were observed in the biochar-amended plots. An increased loss of DOC relative to the control was observed upon rainfall events. Measurements of excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence indicated the DOC increment originated primarily from the organic carbon pool in the soil that became more soluble following biochar incorporation. Keywords Biochar Soil Pore size distribution Water holding capacity DOC EEM fluorescence