Herbicide-based Weed Management in Miscanthus sacchariflorus

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jong-Seok Song ; Soo-Hyun Lim ; Yeonhwa Lim ; Gyoungju Nah ; DoKyoung Lee…
• 关键词：Biomass ; Herbicide ; Miscanthus ; Sequential application ; Weed control
• 刊名：BioEnergy Research
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：March 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：9
• 期：1
• 页码：326-334
• 全文大小：521 KB
• 参考文献：1.Chung JH, Kim DS (2012) Miscanthus as a potential bioenergy crop in East Asia. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 15(2):65–77CrossRef
  2.Lewandowski I, Clifton-Brown JC, Scurlock JMO, Huisman W (2000) Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop. Biomass Bioenerg 19:209–227CrossRef
  3.Lewandowski I, Scurlock JMO, Lindvall E, Christou M (2003) The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenerg 25:335–361CrossRef
  4.Anderson EK, Lee DK, Allen DJ, Voigt TB (2014) Agronomic factors in the establishment of tetraploid seeded Miscanthus × giganteus. Glob Change Biol Bioenerg. doi:10.​1111/​gcbb.​12192
  5.Khanna M, Dhungana B, Clifton-Brown J (2008) Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois. Biomass Bioenerg 32:482–493
  6.Shield IF, Barraclough TJP, Riche AB, Yates NE (2014) The yield and quality response of the energy grass Miscanthus × giganteus to fertiliser applications of nitrogen, potassium and sulphur. Biomass Bioenerg 68:185–194CrossRef
  7.Głowacka K (2011) A review of the genetic study of the energy crop Miscanthus. Biomass Bioenerg 35(7):2445–2454CrossRef
  8.Ma XF, Jensen E, Alexandrov N, Troukhan M, Zhang L, Thomas-Jones S, Farrar K, Clifton-Brown J, Donnison I, Swaller T, Flavell R (2012) High resolution genetic mapping by genome sequencing reveals genome duplication and tetraploid genetic structure of the diploid Miscanthus sinensis. PLoS One 7(3), e33821PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  9.Swaminathan K, Alabady MS, Varala K, De Paoli E, Ho I, Rokhsar DS, Arumuganathan AK, Ming R, Green PJ, Meyers BC, Moose SP, Hudson ME (2010) Genomic and small RNA sequencing of Miscanthus × giganteus shows the utility of sorghum as a reference genome sequence for Andropogoneae grasses. Genome Biol 11(2):R12PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  10.Angelini LG, Ceccarini L, o Di Nasso NN, Bonari E (2009) Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus × giganteus in a long-term field experiment in central Italy: analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance. Biomass Bioenerg 33(4): 635–643
  11.Robles M, Ciampitti IA, Vyn TJ (2012) Responses of maize hybrids to twin-row spatial arrangement at multiple plant densities. Agron J 104(6):1747–1756CrossRef
  12.Anderson EK, Voigt TB, Bollero GA, Hager AG (2010) Miscanthus × giganteus response to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 24:453–460CrossRef
  13.Everman WJ, Lindsey AJ, Henry GM, Glaspie CF, Phillips K, McKenney C (2011) Response of Miscanthus × giganteus and Miscanthus sinensis to postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 25(3):398–403CrossRef
  14.Li X, Grey TL, Blanchett BH, Lee RD, Webster TM, Vencil WK (2013) Tolerance evaluation of vegetatively established Miscanthus × giganteus to herbicides. Weed Technol 27:735–740CrossRef
  15.Smith LL, Askew SD, Hagood ES, Barney JN (2015) Screening preemergence and postemergence herbicides for safety in bioenergy crops. Weed Technol 29:135–146CrossRef
  16.Yook MJ, Lim SH, Song JS, Kim JW, Zhang CJ, Lee EJ, Ibaragi Y, Lee GJ, Nah G, Kim DS (2014) Assessment of genetic diversity of Korean Miscanthus using morphological traits and SSR markers. Biomass Bioenerg 66:81–92CrossRef
  17.Curtis JT (1959) The vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, p 557
  18.Statistical Analysis S (2011) SAS/STAT systems for windows v.9.3. SAS institute, Cary
  19.Bhowmik PC, Bingham SW (1990) Preemergence activity of dinitroaniline herbicides used for weed control in cool-season turfgrasses. Weed Technol 4(2):387–393
  20.Peter CJ, Weber JB (1985) Adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of alachlor and metolachlor as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci 33(6):874–881
  21.Sprague CL, Kells JJ, Penner D (1999) Weed control and corn (Zea mays) tolerance from soil-applied RPA 201772. Weed Technol 13(4):713–725
  22.Armel GR, Wilson HP, Richardson RJ, Hines TE (2009) Mesotrione combinations in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 17(1):111–116CrossRef
  23.Buhler DD, Netzer DA, Riemenschneider DE, Hartzler RG (1998) Weed management in short rotation poplar and herbaceous perennial crops grown for biofuel production. Biomass Bioenerg 14(4):385–394CrossRef
  24.Butler TJ, Muir JP, Ducar JT (2006) Weed control and response to herbicides during Tifton 85 bermudagrass establishment from rhizomes. Agron J 98(3):788–794CrossRef
  25.Mitchell G, Bartlett DW, Fraser TEM, Hawkes TR, Holt DC, Townson JK, Wichert RA (2001) Mesotrione: a new selective herbicide for use in maize. Pest Manag Sci 57(2):120–128
  26.McCurdy JD, McElroy JS, Breeden GK (2009) Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) response to soil-and foliar-applied mesotrione. Weed Technol 23(1):62–66CrossRef
  27.Singh Y, Singh VP, Chauhan B, Orr A, Mortimer AM, Johnson DE, Hardy B (2008) Integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice. In: Singh G (ed) Direct seeding of rice and weed management in the irrigated rice-wheat cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Los Baños (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute, and Pantnagar (India): Directorate of Experiment Station, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, pp 161–175
  28.Inderjit (2004) Weed management under no-tillage systems in tropical regions. In: Souza IF, Alves LWR (eds) Weed biology and management. Springer, Netherlands, pp 329–343CrossRef
  29.Whaley CM, Armel GR, Wilson HP, Hines TE (2006) Comparison of mesotrione combinations with standard weed control programs in corn. Weed Technol 20(3):605–611CrossRef
  30.Miesel JR, Renz MJ, Doll JE, Jackson RD (2012) Effectiveness of weed management methods in establishment of switchgrass and a native species mixture for biofuels in Wisconsin. Biomass Bioenerg 36:121–131CrossRef
  31.Sadeghpour A, Hashemi M, DaCosta M, Jahanzad E, Herbert SJ (2014) Switchgrass establishment influenced by cover crop, tillage systems, and weed control. Bioenerg Res 7:1402–1410CrossRef
  32.Anderson EK, Hager AG, Lee DK, Allen DJ, Voigt TB (2015) Response of seeded Miscanthus × giganteus to PRE and POST herbicides. Weed Technol 29(2):274–283CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Jong-Seok Song (1)
  Soo-Hyun Lim (1)
  Yeonhwa Lim (1)
  Gyoungju Nah (1)
  DoKyoung Lee (1) (2)
  Do-Soon Kim (1)
  
  1. Department of Plant Science, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea
  2. Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61801-4798, USA
  
• 刊物类别：Chemistry and Materials Science
• 刊物主题：Chemistry
  Biomaterials
  Biochemical Engineering
  Bioorganic Chemistry
  
• 出版者：Springer New York
• ISSN：1939-1242

文摘

Although miscanthus is well known for its fast growth and high biomass productivity, its plant establishment and early growth are sensitive to weed interference. Thus, greenhouse and field experiments were conducted to establish an herbicide-based weed management system with pre-emergence (PRE) and post-emergence (POST) herbicides and their sequential applications. The plant establishment and early growth of miscanthus in the first 2 years of planting were significantly affected by weed interference, resulting in a greater than 90 % biomass yield loss in an untreated weedy control in which no herbicide was applied. PRE applications of S-metolachlor, alachlor, and pendimethalin were safe for M. sacchariflorus under both greenhouse and field conditions and showed good weed control under field conditions. POST applications of all of the tested auxinic herbicides, bentazon, thifensulfuron, and mesotrione were safe for M. sacchariflorus and showed good weed control. Sequential applications of PRE (S-metolachlor, pendimethalin or isoxaflutole) and POST herbicides (dicamba, bentazon, or mesotrione) showed better weed control than did their sole applications, resulting in better establishment. In particular, the sequential application of either S-metolachlor or pendimethalin followed by mesotrione showed the most effective weed control (85 % less weeds than the untreated weedy control) with good safety for M. sacchariflorus and thus provided the best early establishment and biomass yield. The mesotrione-based sequential application achieved approximately 15.4 ton ha−1, 79 % of weed-free control in the second year of establishment. Therefore, our results suggest that the sequential applications of PRE and POST herbicides are essential for the first and second year of M. sacchariflorus cultivation.