Identification and categorization of climate change risks

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Yuehong Zhang (1) (2)
  Shaohong Wu (1)
  Erfu Dai (1)
  Dengwei Liu (3)
  Yunhe Yin (1)
  
• 关键词：climate change ; risk identification ; risk categorization ; uncertainty ; degree of membership
• 刊名：Chinese Geographical Science
• 出版年：2008
• 出版时间：September 2008
• 年：2008
• 卷：18
• 期：3
• 页码：268-275
• 全文大小：549KB
• 参考文献：1. Bunting C, 2006. Applying the IRGC Risk Governance Framework: What we have learned about risks and about the IRGC framework ESOF, Munich. http://www.irgc.org
  2. Burrough P A, Heuvelink G B M, 1992. The sensitivity of boolean and continuous (fuzzy) logical modeling to uncertain data. In: EGIS 92. / Proceedings of EGIS 92. VL, Munich, Germany: 1032-041.
  3. Chen Yiyu, Ding Yongjian, She Zhixiang et al., 2005. Assessment of climate and environment changes in China (II): Measures to adapt and mitigate the effects of climate and environment changes. / Advances in Climate Change Research, 1(2): 51-7. (in Chinese)
  4. Demeritt D, 2001. The construction of global warming and the politics of science. / Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2): 307-37. CrossRef
  5. Editorial Committee of National Assessment Report on Climate Change, 2007. / China’s National Assessment Report on Climate Change. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
  6. Glantz M H, 1999. / Creeping Environmental Problems and Sustainable Development in the Aral Sea Basin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Huang Chongfu, Wang Jiading, 1992. / Fuzzy Information Analysis and Application. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. (in Chinese)
  8. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2001. / Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability of Climate Change (Working Group II Report). London: Cambridge University Press.
  9. IPCC, 2005. / The Guidance Notes for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on Addressing Uncertainties. Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.ipcc.ch/activity
  10. IPCC, 2007. / Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability—Working Group II Contribution to IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. London: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Kleinen T, Petschel-Held G, 2007. Integrated assessment of changes in flooding probabilities due to climate change. / Climatic Change, 81: 283-12. CrossRef
  12. Manning M R, 2006. The treatment of uncertainties in the fourth IPCC assessment report. / Advances in Climate Change Research, 2(Suppl. 1): 13-1.
  13. Manning M R, Petit M, Easterling D et al., 2004. IPCC workshop on describing scientific uncertainties in climate change to support analysis of risk and of options. http://www.ipcc.ch
  14. McInnes K L, Walsh K J E, Hubbert G D et al., 2003. Impact of sea-level rise and storm surges on a coastal community. / Natural Hazards, 30: 187-07. CrossRef
  15. Milly P C D, Dunne K A, Vecchia A V, 2005. Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. / Nature, 438(7066), 347-50. CrossRef
  16. Morgan M G, Florig H K, Michael L D, 2000. Categorizing risks for risk ranking. / Risk Analysis, 20(1): 49-8. CrossRef
  17. National Research Council, 1997. / Rediscovering Geography: New Relevance for Science and Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  18. Nicholls R J, Tol R S J, 2006. Impacts and responses to sea-level rise: A global analysis of the SRES scenarios over the twenty-first century. / Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 364: 1073-095.
  19. Obersteiner M, Azar C, Kauppi P et al., 2001. Managing climate risk. / Science, 294(5543): 786-87. CrossRef
  20. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2003. / Emerging Systemic Risks. Final Report to the OECD Futures Project. Paris: OECD.
  21. Oppenheimer M, 2005. Defining dangerous anthropogenic interference: The role of science, the limits of science. / Risk Analysis, 25(6): 1399-407. CrossRef
  22. Oppenheimer M, Petsonk A, 2005. Article 2 of the UNFCCC: Historical origins, recent interpretations. / Climatic Change, 73: 195-26. CrossRef
  23. Patwardhan A, Schneider S H, Semenov S M, 2003. / Assessing the Science to Address UNFCCC Article 2: A Concept Paper Relating to Cross Cutting Theme Number Four. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch
  24. Reiter P, Thomas C J, Atkinson P et al., 2004. Global warming and malaria: A call for accuracy. / The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 4: 323-24. CrossRef
  25. Renn O, 2005. White Paper on Risk Governance—Towards an integrative approach. White paper No.1 of the International Risk Governance Council. http://www.irgc.org
  26. Risbey J S, Kandlikar M, 2007. Expressions of likelihood and confidence in the IPCC uncertainty assessment process. / Climatic Change, 85: 19-1. CrossRef
  27. Roger N J, 2004. When do POETS become dangerous? In: Manning M R et al. (eds.). / IPCC Workshop on Describing Scientific Uncertainties in Climate Change to Support Analysis of Risk and of Options. http://www.ipcc.ch
  28. Rogers D J, Randolph S E, 2000. The global spread of malaria in a future, warmer world. / Science, 289: 1763-765. CrossRef
  29. Thuiller W S, Lavorel M B, Araujo M T et al., 2005. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. / Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102: 8245-250. CrossRef
  30. Tubiello F N, 2005. Climate variability and agriculture: Perspectives on current and future challenges. In: Knight B (ed). / Impact of Climate Change, Variability and Weather Fluctuations on Crops and Their Produce Markets. Cambridge, UK.
  31. Van Aalst M, 2004. Mainstreaming climate risk management into development planning. / The Global Forum on Sustainable Development (GFSD). Paris: OECD.
  32. Wu Shaohong, Yin Yunhe, Zhao Huixia et al., 2005. Recongnition of ecosystem response to climate change impact. / Advances in Climate Change Research, 1(3): 115-18. (in Chinese)
  
• 作者单位：Yuehong Zhang (1) (2)
  Shaohong Wu (1)
  Erfu Dai (1)
  Dengwei Liu (3)
  Yunhe Yin (1)
  
  1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
  2. Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
  3. Development Research Center, Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing, 100038, China
  
• ISSN：1993-064X

文摘

The scientific evidence that climate is changing due to greenhouse gas emission is now incontestable, which may put many social, biological, and geophysical systems in the world at risk. In this paper, we first identified main risks induced from or aggravated by climate change. Then we categorized them applying a new risk categorization system brought forward by Renn in a framework of International Risk Governance Council. We proposed that “uncertainty-could be treated as the classification criteria. Based on this, we established a quantitative method with fuzzy set theory, in which “confidence-and “likelihood- the main quantitative terms for expressing uncertainties in IPCC, were used as the feature parameters to construct the fuzzy membership functions of four risk types. According to the maximum principle, most climate change risks identified were classified into the appropriate risk types. In the mean time, given that not all the quantitative terms are available, a qualitative approach was also adopted as a complementary classification method. Finally, we get the preliminary results of climate change risk categorization, which might lay the foundation for the future integrated risk management of climate change.