Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Yucheng Zhang ; Zhenyu Liao
• 关键词：Abusive supervision ; Consequences ; Power distance ; Meta ; analysis
• 刊名：Asia Pacific Journal of Management
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：December 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：32
• 期：4
• 页码：959-987
• 全文大小：577 KB
• 参考文献：*Adams, G. A., & Webster, J. R. 2013. Emotional regulation as a mediator between interpersonal mistreatment and distress. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(6): 697-10.
  *Alexander, K. 2012. Abusive supervision as a predictor of deviance and health outcomes: The exacerbating role of narcissism and social support. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 72(12-B): 7731.
  Aquino, K., & Thau, S. 2009. Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1): 717-41.
  *Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. 2007. Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1): 191-01.
  *Aryee, S., Sun, L. Y., Chen, Z. X. G., & Debrah, Y. A. 2008. Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 393-11.
  Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. 1992. Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions. Personnel Psychology, 45(1): 141-64.
  Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. 2006. Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59(6): 723-52.
  Becker, G. S. 1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76: 169-17.
  *Biron, M. 2010. Negative reciprocity and the association between perceived organizational ethical values and organizational deviance. Human Relations, 63(6): 875-97.
  Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. 1994. Sex-differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20(1): 27-3.
  Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. 2009. Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2): 445-64.
  Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
  Bochner, S., & Hesketh, B. 1994. Power distance, individualism collectivism, and job-related attitudes in a culturally diverse work group. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(2): 233-57.
  Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. 2011. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
  *Bowling, N. A., & Michel, J. S. 2011. Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates-responses to abusive supervision. Work and Stress, 25(4): 309-20.
  *Breaux, D. M., Perrewé, P. L., Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Hochwarter, W. A. 2008. Time to try a little tenderness? The detrimental effects of accountability when coupled with abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2): 111-22.
  *Breaux, D. M., Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Folger, R. G. 2010. An attributional analysis of employees-responses to abusive supervision. In L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.). Dark side of management: 69-2. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing-Iap.
  *Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2): 117-34.
  *Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Chiaburu, D. S. 2008. Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4): 912-22.
  *Burton, J. P., & Hoobler, J. M. 2011. Aggressive reactions to abusive supervision: The role of interactional justice and narcissism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52(4): 389-98.
  *Carlson, D., Ferguson, M., Hunter, E., & Whitten, D. 2012. Abusive supervision and work-family conflict: The path through emotional labor and burnout. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5): 849-59.
  *Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., Perrewe, P. L., & Whitten, D. 2011. The fallout from abusive supervision: An examination of subordinates and their partners. Personnel Psychology, 64(4): 937-61.
  *Chang, K., Kuo, C. C., Su, M., & Taylor, J. 2013. Dis-identification in organizations and its role in the workplace. Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations, 68(3): 479-06.
  *Chi, S.-C. S., & Liang, S.-G. 2013. When do subordinates-emotion-regulation strategies matter? Abusive supervision, subordinates-emotional exhaustion, and work withdrawal. Leadership Quarterly, 24(1): 125.
  Conger, J. A. 1998. Qualitative research as the cornerstone methodology for understanding leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 9(1): 107-21.
  Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. 2005. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6): 874-00.
  *Decoster, S., Camps, J., Stouten, J., Vandevyvere, L., & Tripp, T. M. 2013. Standing by your organization
• 作者单位：Yucheng Zhang (1)
  Zhenyu Liao (2)
  
  1. Research Institute of Economics and Management, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, China, 55 Guanghuacun Street, Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610074, People’s Republic of China
  2. Department of Management and Organization, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Business Link, 15 Kent Ridge Drive, Singapore, Singapore
  
• 刊物类别：Business and Economics
• 刊物主题：Economics
  Management
  Business
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1572-9958

文摘

While a plethora of studies have examined the relationships between abusive supervision and outcomes, there is a lack of a comprehensive and systematic framework that integrates the consequences and moderators of abusive supervision. We fill the void in the abusive supervision literature through conducting a quantitative review. Based on a meta-analysis of 119 independent samples (N--5,239), we found that abusive supervision was related to subordinates-attitudes, well-beings, organizational justice perceptions, workplace behaviors, performance, and family-related outcomes. In addition, we found that power distance moderated the relationships of abusive supervision with subordinates-workplace behaviors and performance in Asia and North America. In addition, the relationships between abusive supervision and its consequences were contingent on subordinates-age, organizational tenure, and time spent with supervisors, and research design. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. Keywords Abusive supervision Consequences Power distance Meta-analysis