UV disinfection of Staphylococcus aureus in ballast water: Effect of growth phase on the disinfection kinetics and the mechanization at molecular level
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:ZhiJun Ren ; Lin Zhang ; Yue Shi
  • 关键词:UV disinfection ; kinetics ; growth phases ; Biphasic models ; DNA damage
  • 刊名:SCIENCE CHINA Technological Sciences
  • 出版年:2016
  • 出版时间:February 2016
  • 年:2016
  • 卷:59
  • 期:2
  • 页码:330-336
  • 全文大小:537 KB
  • 参考文献:1.Carlton J T, Geller J B. Ecological roulette: the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science, 1993, 261: 78–82CrossRef
    2.Hallmich C, Gehr R. Effect of pre- and post-UV disinfection conditions on photoreactivation of fecal coliforms in wastewater effluents. Water Res, 2010, 44: 2885–2893CrossRef
    3.Oemcke D J, Parker N, Mountfort D. Effect of UV irradiation on viability of micro scale and resistant forms of marine organisms: Implications for the treatment of ship’s ballast water. J Marine Environ Eng, 2004, 7: 153–171
    4.Sassi J, Viitasalo S, Rytkonen J, et al. Experiments with ultraviolet light, ultrasound and ozone technologies for onboard ballast water treatment. VTT Tiedotteita-Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus, 2005, 2313: 1–80
    5.Sutherland T F, Levings C D, Petersen S, et al. Mortality of zooplankton and invertebrate larvae exposed to cyclonic pretreatment and ultraviolet radiation. Marine Technol Soc J, 2003, 37: 3–12CrossRef
    6.Wright D A, Dawson R, Orano-Dawson C E, et al. A test of the efficacy of a ballast water treatment system aboard the vessel Coral Princess. Marine Technol, 2007, 44: 57–67
    7.Wu D, You H, Jin D, et al. Enhanced inactivation of Escherichia coli with Ag-coated TiO2 thin film under UV-C irradiation. J photoch photobio A, 2011, 217: 177–183CrossRef
    8.Tsolaki E, Diamadopoulos E. Technologies for ballast water treatment, a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2010, 85: 19–32CrossRef
    9.Waite T D, Kazumi J, Lane P V Z, et al. Removal of natural populations of marine plankton by a large-scale ballast water treatment system. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2003, 258: 51–63CrossRef
    10.National Research Council. Stemming the Tide: Controlling Introductions of Nonindigenous Species by Ships’ Ballast Water. Washington: National Academy Press, 1996
    11.Salcedo I, Andrades J A, Quiroga J M, et al. Photo reactivation and dark repair in UV treated microorganisms: Effect of temperature. Appl Environ Microb, 2007, 73: 1594–1600CrossRef
    12.Brahmi M, Belhadi N H, Hamdi H, et al. Modeling of secondary treated wastewater disinfection by UV irradiation: effects of suspended solids content. J Environ Sci, 2010, 22: 1218–1224CrossRef
    13.Hijnen W A M, BeerendonkE F, MedemaG J. Inactivation credit of UV radiation for viruses, bacteria and protozoan (oo)cysts in water: a review. Water Res, 2006, 40: 3–22CrossRef
    14.Sommer R, Weber G, Cabaj A, et al. UV inactivation of microorganisms in water. Zbl Hyg, 1989, 189: 214–224.
    15.Craik S A, Finch G R, Bolton J R, et al. Inactivation of Giardia muris cysts using medium-pressure ultraviolet radiation in filtered drinking water. Water Res, 2000, 34: 4325–4332CrossRef
    16.Yu L, Xiang H, Fan J, et al. Global transcriptional response of Staphylococcus aureus to rein, a natural plant product. J Biotechnol, 2008, 135: 304–308CrossRef
    17.Kuo J, Chen C L, Nellor M. Standardized collimated beam testing protocol for water/wastewater ultraviolet disinfection. J Environ Eng, 2003, 129: 774–779CrossRef
    18.Rhodes T R, Jun L C, James M. Rational design of chlorine contact facilities. J Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF), 1977, 49: 659–667
    19.Roustan M, Stambolieva Z, Duguet J P. Influence of hydrodynamics on Giardia cyst inactivation by Ozone. Ozone Sci Eng, 1991, 13: 451–462CrossRef
    20.Hassena A, Heyounib A, Shayebb H. Inactivation of indicator bacteria in wastewater by chlorine-a kinetics study. Bioresource Technol, 2000, 72: 85–93CrossRef
    21.Shayed H, Riabi T, Roustan M, et al. Experimental study and modeling of chlorine disinfection of treated wastewater. J Water Sci, 1998, 4: 517–536
    22.Leahy J G, Rubin A J, Sproul O J. Inactivation of cysts by free chlorine. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1987, 6: 120–128.
    23.Srinivasan P, Sarmah A K, Rohan M. Deriving sulfamethoxazole dissipation endpoints in pasture soils using first order and biphasic kinetic models. Sci Total Environ, 2014, 488–489: 146–156CrossRef
    24.Barker K. At the Bench: A Laboratory Navigator. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, 1998
    25.Labas M D, Brandi R J, MartínC A. Kinetics of bacteria inactivation employing UV radiation under clear water conditions. Chem Eng J, 2006, 121: 135–145CrossRef
    26.Hassen A, Mahrouk M, Ouzari H, et al. UV disinfection of treated wastewater in a large-scale pilot plant and inactivation of selected bacteria in a laboratory UV device. Bioresource Technol, 2000, 74: 141–150CrossRef
    27.Nagelkerke N J D. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 1991, 78: 691–692CrossRef MathSciNet
    28.Robin C. McKellar, Lu X W. Modeling Microbial Responses in Foods. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 2003
    29.Geeraerd A H, Valdramidis V P, Van I J F. GInaFiT, a freeware tool to assess non-log-linear microbial survivor curves. Int J Food Microbiol, 2005, 102: 95–105.CrossRef
    30.Gilboa Y, Friedler E. UV disinfection of RBC-treated light greywater effluent: Kinetics, survival and regrowth of selected microorganisms. Water Res, 2008, 42: 1043–1050CrossRef
    31.Vélez-Colmenares J J, Acevedo A, Nebot E. Effect of recirculation and initial concentration of microorganisms on the disinfection kinetics of Escherichia coli. Desalination, 2011, 280: 20–26CrossRef
    32.Sommer R, Haider T, Cabaj A, et al. Time dose reciprocity in UV disinfection of water. Water Sci Technol, 1998, 38: 145–150CrossRef
    33.Rincon A G, Pulgarin C. Field solar E. coli inactivation in the absence and presence of TiO2: Is UV solar dose an appropriate parameter for standardization of water solar disinfection. Sol Energ, 2004, 77: 635–648CrossRef
    34.Nair S, Finkel S E. Dps protects cells against multiple stresses during stationary phase. J Bacteriol, 2004, 186: 4192–4198CrossRef
    35.Jacquelyn G B. Microbiology: Principles and Explorations. 7nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, John, 2008
    36.Matthew D R. Lag phase is a distinct growth phase that prepares bacteria for exponential growth and involves transient metal accumulation. J Bacteriol, 2012, 194: 686CrossRef
    37.Tang J N, Long F, Shi X M, et al. Evaluations on DNA extraction methods of Staphylococcus aureus. Chin J Health Lab Tech, 2008, l18: 1467–1469
    38.Süss J, Volz S, Obst U, et al. Application of a molecular biology concept for the detection of DNA damage and repair during UV disinfection. Water Res, 2009, 43: 3705–3716CrossRef
    39.Taghipour F. Ultraviolet and ionizing radiation for microorganism inactivation. Water Res, 2004, 3: 83940–39
    40.Snider K E, Darby J L, Tchobanoglous G. Evaluation of Ultraviolet Disinfection for Wastewater Reuse Applications in California. Davis: University of California, 1991
    41.USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Ultraviolet Light Disinfection Technology in Drinking Water Application—An Overview. Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water. 1996. EPA 811-R-96-002
  • 作者单位:ZhiJun Ren (1)
    Lin Zhang (1)
    Yue Shi (2)

    1. College of Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China
    2. College of Power and Energy Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China
  • 刊物类别:Engineering
  • 刊物主题:Chinese Library of Science
    Engineering, general
  • 出版者:Science China Press, co-published with Springer
  • ISSN:1869-1900
文摘
This work aimed to study the inactivate kinetics of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) in artificial seawater by ultraviolet radiation, establish relationships between model parameters and growth phases, and explain the mechanization of UV disinfection by molecular biological detection. Investigations were carried out for the validation of Chick-Watson, Collins-Selleck, Hom and Biphasic models when S. aureus was in stationary phase (t=14 h). The results showed that the Biphasic kinetic model’s R 2 turned out to be the highest one (R 2=0.9892) and RMSE was less than 0.5 (RMSE =0.2699). The Biphasic kinetic model was better fit for ultraviolet disinfection than the other three models under the circumstance of this experiment and chosen to fit the ultraviolet disinfection curves for microorganisms at three growth phases. The sensitivity of microorganisms under ultraviolet radiation was in the following order: in exponential phase > in stationary phase > in lag phase by comparing the indexes of the Biphasic model (k 1 and x). Besides, agarose gel electrophoresis was used in order to directly assess the damage to DNA of microorganisms that were exposed to the different dose of UV irradiation. The results revealed that DNA damage caused by UV radiation was an important reason for the microorganism inactivation and as the UV dose increased, there was greater damage caused in DNA. Keywords UV disinfection kinetics growth phases Biphasic models DNA damage

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700