Soziale Unterschiede in der ambulanten und stationären Versorgung

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jens Klein ; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
• 关键词：Soziale Ungleichheit ; Medizinische Versorgung ; Zugang ; Inanspruchnahme ; Versorgungsqualität ; Social inequality ; Access ; Utilization ; Quality of health care ; Health care services
• 刊名：Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：February 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：59
• 期：2
• 页码：238-244
• 全文大小：414 KB
• 参考文献：1.Tiesmeyer K, Brause M, Lierse M, Lukas-Nülle M, Hehlmann T (Hrsg) (2008) Der blinde Fleck. Ungleichheiten in der Gesundheitsversorgung. Huber, Bern
  2.von dem Knesebeck O, Bauer U, Geyer S, Mielck A (2009) Soziale Ungleichheit in der gesundheitlichen Versorgung – Ein Plädoyer für systematische Forschung. Gesundheitswesen 71:59–62CrossRef
  3.Goddard M, Smith P (2001) Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK. Soc Sci Med 53:1149–1162CrossRef PubMed
  4.Oliver A, Mossialos E (2004) Equity of access to health care: outlining the foundations for action. J Epidemiol Community Health 58:655–658PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  5.Andersen RM (1995) Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 36:1–10CrossRef PubMed
  6.Donabedian A (1988) The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 260:1743–1748CrossRef PubMed
  7.Rosenbrock R (2015) Prävention in Lebenswelten - der Setting Ansatz. Z Allgemeinmed 91:213–219
  8.Mielck A (2005) Soziale Ungleichheit und Gesundheit. Einführung in die aktuelle Diskussion. Huber, Bern
  9.Hofmeister C, Maier W, Mielck A, Stahl L, Breckenkamp J, Razum O (2015) Regionale Deprivation in Deutschland: Bundesweite Analyse des Zusammenhangs mit Mortalität unter Verwendung des ‚German Index of Multiple Deprivation (GIMD)‘ Gesundheitswesen (Epub ahead of print)
  10.Janßen C, Grosse Frie K, Dinger H, Schiffmann L, Ommen O (2009) Der Einfluss sozialer Ungleichheit auf die medizinische und gesundheitsbezogene Versorgung in Deutschland. In: Richter M, Hurrelmann K (Hrsg) Gesundheitliche Ungleichheit. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, S 149–165CrossRef
  11.Kowalski C, Loss J, Kölsch F, Janssen C (2014) Utilization of prevention services by gender, age, socioeconomic status, and migration status in Germany: an overview and a systematic review. In: Janssen C, Swart E, Lengerke T von (Hrsg) Health care utilization in Germany. Springer, New York, S 293–320CrossRef
  12.Klein J, Hofreuter-Gätgens K, von dem Knesebeck O (2014) Socioeconomic status and the utilization of health services in Germany: a systematic review. In: Janssen C, Swart E, Lengerke T von (Hrsg) Health care utilization in Germany. Springer, New York, S 117–143CrossRef
  13.Huber J, Mielck A (2010) Morbidität und Gesundheitsversorgung bei GKV- und PKV-Versicherten. Forschungsstand empirischer Studien. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 53:925–938CrossRef PubMed
  14.Roll K, Stargardt T, Schreyögg J (2012) Effect of type of insurance and income on waiting time for outpatient care. Geneva Pap Risk Insur 37:609–632CrossRef
  15.Sundmacher L, Kopetsch T (2013) Waiting times in the ambulatory sector – the case of chronically ill patients. Int J Equity Health 12:77PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  16.Becklas E, Mielck A, Böcken J (2013) Das Arzt-Patienten-Verhältnis in der ambulanten Versorgung – Unterschiede zwischen GKV- und PKV-Versicherten. In: Böcken J, Braun B, Repschläger U (Hrsg) Gesundheitsmonitor 2012. Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, S 28–53
  17.Standop J, Kuhn Y, Glowka TR et al (2012) Association of socio-economic status and stage of pancreatic cancer at time of surgery in a German setting. Hepatogastroenterology 59:2614–2617PubMed
  18.Langenbach MR, Sauerland S, Kröbel K-W, Zirngibl H (2010) Why so late?! – delay in treatment of colorectal cancer is socially determined. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:1017–1024CrossRef PubMed
  19.Weigel A, Rossi M, Wendt H et al (2014) Duration of untreated illness and predictors of late treatment initiation in anorexia nervosa. J Public Health 22:519–527CrossRef
  20.Mielck A, Kiess R, von dem Knesebeck O, Stirbu I, Kunst AE (2009) Association between forgone care and household income among the elderly in five Western European countries – analyses based on survey data from the SHARE-study. BMC Health Serv Res 9:52PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  21.Bremer P (2014) Forgone care and financial burden due to out-of-pocket payments within the German health care system. Health. Econ Rev 4:36
  22.Wendt C, Mischke M, Pfeifer M, Reibling N (2012) Confidence in receiving medical care when seriously ill: a seven-country comparison of the impact of cost barriers. Health Expect 15:212–224CrossRef PubMed
  23.Bremer P, Sauerland D, Wübker A (2013) Zuzahlungen im deutschen Gesundheitssystem: Ausmaß, Determinanten und Konsequenzen für die Medikamenteninanspruchnahme. In: Böcken J, Braun B, Repschläger U (Hrsg) Gesundheitsmonitor 2013. Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, S 167–185
  24.Rattay P, Butschalowsky H, Rommel A et al (2013) Inanspruchnahme der ambulanten und stationären medizinischen Versorgung in Deutschland. Ergebnisse der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 56:832–844CrossRef
  25.Kroll LE, Lampert T (2013) Direct costs of inequalities in health care utilization in Germany 1994 to 2009: a top-down projection. BMC Health Serv Res 13:271PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  26.Starker A, Saß A-C (2013) Inanspruchnahme von Krebsfrüherkennungsuntersuchungen. Ergebnisse der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 56:858–867CrossRef
  27.Poethko-Müller DC, Schmitz R (2013) Impfstatus von Erwachsenen in Deutschland. Ergebnisse der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 56:845–857CrossRef
  28.Vogt V, Siegel M, Sundmacher L (2014) Examining regional variation in the use of cancer screening in Germany. Soc Sci Med 110:74–80CrossRef PubMed
  29.Hoebel J, Richter M, Lampert T (2013) Social status and participation in health checks in men and women in Germany: results from the German Health Update (GEDA), 2009 and 2010. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 110:679–685PubMedCentral PubMed
  30.Rattay P, Starker A, Domanska O, Butschalowsky H, Gutsche J, Kamtsiuris P, KiGGS Study Group (2014) Trends in der Inanspruchnahme ambulant-ärztlicher Leistungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Ergebnisse der KiGGS-Studie – Ein Vergleich von Basiserhebung und erster Folgebefragung (KiGGS Welle 1). Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 57:878–891CrossRef
  31.Hoffmann F, Bachmann CJ (2014) Unterschiede in den soziodemografischen Merkmalen, der Gesundheit und Inanspruchnahme bei Kindern und Jugendlichen nach ihrer Krankenkassenzugehörigkeit. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 57:455–463CrossRef
  32.Mack S, Jacobi F, Gerschler A et al (2014) Self-reported utilization of mental health services in the adult German population – evidence for unmet needs? Results of the DEGS1-Mental Health Module (DEGS1-MH). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 23:289–303CrossRef PubMed
  33.Hintzpeter B, Klasen F, Schön G, Voss C, Hölling H, Ravens-Sieberer U, BELLA study group (2015) Mental health care use among children and adolescents in Germany: results of the longitudinal BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 24:705–713CrossRef PubMed
  34.Hirschfeld G, Wager J, Zernikow B (2015) Physician consultation in young children with recurrent pain-a population-based study. PeerJ 3:e916PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  35.Devaux M (2015) Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries. Eur J Health Econ 16:21–33CrossRef PubMed
  36.Neumann M, Bensing J, Wirtz M et al (2011) The impact of financial incentives on physician empathy: a study from the perspective of patients with private and statutory health insurance. Patient Educ Couns 84:208–216CrossRef PubMed
  37.Bozorgmehr K, Sebastian MS, Brenner H et al (2015) Analysing horizontal equity in enrolment in Disease Management Programmes for coronary heart disease in Germany 2008–2010. Int J Equity Health 14:28PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  38.Rückert I-M, Maier W, Mielck A et al (2012) Personal attributes that influence the adequate management of hypertension and dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Results from the DIAB-CORE Cooperation. Cardiovasc Diabetol 11:120PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  39.Tamayo T, Claessen H, Rückert I-M et al (2014) Treatment pattern of type 2 diabetes differs in two German regions and with patients’ socioeconomic position. PLoS One 9:e99773PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  40.Altenhöner T, Baczkiewicz C, Weishaar H, Kutschmann M (2012) Inequalities in therapeutic treatment during cardiac inpatient rehabilitation in Germany. Int J Public Health 57:175–184CrossRef PubMed
  41.Jansen L, Eberle A, Emrich K et al (2014) Socioeconomic deprivation and cancer survival in Germany: an ecological analysis in 200 districts in Germany. Int J Cancer 134:2951–2960CrossRef PubMed
  42.Kuhn Y, Koscielny A, Glowka T, Hirner A, Kalff JC, Standop J (2010) Postresection survival outcomes of pancreatic cancer according to demographic factors and socio-economic status. Eur J Surg Oncol 36:496–500CrossRef PubMed
  43.Kirchberger I, Meisinger C, Golüke H et al (2014) Long-term survival among older patients with myocardial infarction differs by educational level: results from the MONICA/KORA myocardial infarction registry. Int J Equity Health 13:19PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  44.Kobelt A, Lieverscheidt B, Grosch E, Petermann F (2010) Ambulante psychosomatische Nachsorge und soziale Ungleichheit. Psychotherapeut 55:43–48CrossRef
  45.Deck R (2012) Soziale Ungleichheit in der Rehabilitation orthopädischer Erkrankungen. In: Deck R, Glaser-Möller N, Kohlmann T (Hrsg) Rehabilitation bei sozial benachteiligten Bevölkerungsgruppen. Jacobs Verlag, Lage, S 65–80
  46.Petersen JJ, Paulitsch MA, Mergenthal K et al (2014) Implementation of chronic illness care in German primary care practices – how do multimorbid older patients view routine care? A cross-sectional study using multilevel hierarchical modeling. BMC Health Serv Res 14:336PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  47.Swart E, Griehl S (2014) The problem of repeated surveys. How comparable are their results regarding the utilization of medical services? In: Janssen C, Swart E, Lengerke T von (Hrsg) Health care utilization in Germany. Springer, New York, S 45–62CrossRef
  48.Watt G (2002) The inverse care law today. Lancet 360:252–254CrossRef PubMed
  49.Sundmacher L, Ozegowski S (2015) Regional distribution of physicians: the role of comprehensive private health insurance in Germany. Eur J Health Econ (Epub ahead of print)
  50.Faller H (2012) Patientenorientierte Kommunikation in der Arzt-Patient-Beziehung. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 55:1106–1112CrossRef
  51.Kickbusch I, Marstedt G (2008) Gesundheitskompetenz: eine unterbelichtete Dimension sozialer Ungleichheit. In: Böcken J, Braun B, Amhof R (Hrsg) Gesundheitsmonitor 2008. Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, S 12–28
  52.Langewitz W (2012) Zur Erlernbarkeit der Arzt-Patienten-Kommunikation in der Medizinischen Ausbildung. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 55:1176–1182CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Jens Klein (1)
  Olaf von dem Knesebeck (1)
  
  1. Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20146, Hamburg, Deutschland
  
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  General Practice and Family Medicine
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1437-1588

文摘

There is controversy about social disparities in healthcare services in Germany, but a differentiated analysis regarding various dimensions of healthcare is lacking. This narrative review intends to summarize conceptually the current state of research and draw subsequent conclusions. Separated into access, utilization and quality, the findings of social inequality in outpatient and inpatient care in Germany are summarized. Besides the common individual indicators of socioeconomic status (SES), regional deprivation and health insurance status are also included. Despite methodical diversity, the results show that healthcare inequalities due to SES exist, but not universally. Furthermore, there is a differentiated pattern respecting separate dimensions of healthcare. Concerning access (e.g. waiting times, co-payments) lower status groups and patients covered by statutory health insurance are deprived. Higher utilization becomes apparent among higher status groups and privately insured patients in terms of specialist consultations and prevention services. The findings regarding quality of process and outcome differ depending on quality indicator and disease. In different dimensions of medical healthcare, social disparities still exist, though the impact on health remains unclear for some types of healthcare inequalities. Moreover, it is often difficult to conclude from unequal outcome quality the inequalities of healthcare. Depending on access, utilization and quality, separate interventions for reducing these disparities are to be introduced. Keywords Social inequality Access Utilization Quality of health care Health care services