Metal–metal bonding and aromaticity in [M2(NHCHNH)3]2 (μ-E)2 (E᾿ O, S; M᾿ Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh)
文摘
The nature of M–M bonding and aromaticity of [M2(NHCHNH)3]2(μ-E)2 (E = O, S; M = Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh) was investigated using atoms in molecules (AIM) theory, electron localization function (ELF), natural bond orbital (NBO) and molecular orbital analysis. These analyses led to the following main conclusions: in [M2(NHCHNH)3]2(μ-E)2 (E = O, S; M = Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh), the Nb–Nb, Ru–Ru, and Rh–Rh bonds belong to “metallic” bonds, whereas Mo–Mo and Tc–Tc drifted toward the “dative” side; all these bonds are partially covalent in character. The Nb–Nb, Mo–Mo, and Tc–Tc bonds are stronger than Ru–Ru and Rh–Rh bonds. The M–M bonds in [M2(NHCHNH)3]2(μ-S)2 are stronger than those in [M2(NHCHNH)3]2(μ-O)2 for M = Nb, Mo, Tc, and Ru. The NICS(1)ZZ values show that all of the studied molecules, except [Ru2(NHCHNH)3]2(μ-O)2, are aromaticity molecules. O-bridged compounds have more aromaticity than S-bridged compounds.