Credibility and legitimacy in policy-driven innovation networks: resource dependencies and expectations in Dutch electric vehicle subsidies

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Frank J. van Rijnsoever (1)
  Leon Welle (2)
  Sjoerd Bakker (3)
  
• 关键词：Electric vehicle technology ; Expectations ; Resource dependence theory ; Credibility ; Legitimacy ; Innovation policy ; LO38 ; LL620
• 刊名：The Journal of Technology Transfer
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：August 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：39
• 期：4
• 页码：635-661
• 全文大小：411 KB
• 参考文献：1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. / The Academy of Management Review, / 27, 17鈥?0.
  2. Aguillo, I. F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. L. (2010). Comparing university rankings. / Scientometrics, / 85, 243鈥?56. CrossRef
  3. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. / Administrative Science Quarterly, / 45, 425鈥?55. CrossRef
  4. Alkemade, F., & Suurs, R. A. A. (2012). Patterns of expectations for emerging sustainable technologies. / Technological Forecasting and Social Change, / 79, 448鈥?56. CrossRef
  5. Anderson, R. C., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1978). Publication ratings versus peer ratings of universities. / Journal of the American Society for Information Science, / 29, 91鈥?03. CrossRef
  6. Bakker, S. (2010). The car industry and the blow-out of the hydrogen hype. / Energy Policy, / 38, 6540鈥?544. CrossRef
  7. Bakker, S., & Trip, J. J. (2013). Policy options to support the adoption of electric vehicles in the urban environment. / Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, / 25, 18鈥?3. CrossRef
  8. Bakker, S., Van Lente, H., & Meeus, M. T. H. (2011). Arenas of expectations for hydrogen technologies. / Technological Forecasting and Social Change, / 78, 152鈥?62. CrossRef
  9. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. / Journal of Management, / 17, 99鈥?20. CrossRef
  10. Baruch, Y., & Hall, D. T. (2004). The academic career: A model for future careers in other sectors? / Journal of Vocational Behavior, / 64, 241鈥?62. CrossRef
  11. Bates, D. M., & Sarkar, D. (2006). / The lme4 library. http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/R/CRAN.
  12. Berkhout, F. (2006). Normative expectations in systems innovation. / Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, / 18, 299鈥?11. CrossRef
  13. Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2010). A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications. / Journal of Informetrics, / 4, 211鈥?20. CrossRef
  14. Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. / Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, / 18, 285鈥?98. CrossRef
  15. Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-of-the-art. / The Journal of Technology Transfer, / 38, 1鈥?7. CrossRef
  16. Brown, N., & Michael, M. (2003). A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. / Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, / 15, 3鈥?8. CrossRef
  17. Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. / Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, / 566, 37鈥?4. CrossRef
  18. Butts, C. T. (2008). Social network analysis with sna. / Journal of Statistical Software, / 24, 1鈥?1.
  19. Butts, C. T. (2012). / Tools for social network analysis. R package version 2. http://stat.ethz.ch/CRAN/web/packages/sna.
  20. Carayol, N. (2003). Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: Reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. / Research Policy, / 32, 887鈥?08. CrossRef
  21. Carlsson, B., & Jacobsson, S. (1997). Diversity creation and technological systems: A technology policy perspective. In C. Edquist (Ed.), / Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter Publishers.
  22. Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. / Journal of Evolutionary Economics, / 1, 93鈥?18. CrossRef
  23. Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2010). Rationales for public policy intervention in the innovation process: A systems of innovation approach. In R. Smits, S. Kuhlmann, & P. Shapira (Eds.), / The theory and practice of innovation policy: An international research handbook. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.
  24. Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent鈥檚 curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. / The Journal of Marketing, / 64, 1鈥?7. CrossRef
  25. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. / Administrative Science Quarterly, / 35, 128鈥?52. CrossRef
  26. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. / American Journal of Sociology, / 94, S95鈥揝120. CrossRef
  27. Commission, European. (2003). COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. / Official Journal of the European Union, / 124, 36鈥?1.
  28. Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. / Strategic Management Journal, / 23, 1095鈥?121. CrossRef
  29. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. / Journal of Business Venturing, / 18, 301鈥?31. CrossRef
  30. Deeds, D. L., Mang, P. Y., & Frandsen, M. L. (2004). The influence of firms鈥?and industries鈥?legitimacy on the flow of capital into high-technology ventures. / Strategic Organization, / 2, 9鈥?4. CrossRef
  31. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. / American Sociological Review, / 48, 147鈥?60. CrossRef
  32. Dutch Court of Audit. (2011). / Innovatiebeleid (Innovation Policy). The Hague: Algemene Rekenkamer. Retrieved from http://www.rekenkamer.nl/Publicaties/Onderzoeksrapporten/Introducties/2011/09/Innovatiebeleid.
  33. Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation approaches鈥擳heir emergence and characteristics. In C. Edquist (Ed.), / Systems of innovation. London: Pinter.
  34. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and 鈥淢ode 2鈥?to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. / Research Policy, 29, 109鈥?23.
  35. Ewing, G. O., & Sarig枚ll眉, E. (1998). Car fuel-type choice under travel demand management and economic incentives. / Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, / 3, 429鈥?44. CrossRef
  36. Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. / Pattern Recognition Letters, / 27, 861鈥?74. CrossRef
  37. Fombrun, C. (1996). / Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  38. Frenken, K., Hekkert, M., & Godfroij, P. (2004). R&D portfolios in environmentally friendly automotive propulsion: Variety, competition and policy implications. / Technological Forecasting and Social Change, / 71, 485鈥?07. CrossRef
  39. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schawartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). / The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
  40. Greene, W. H. (1997). / Econometic analysis (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  41. Greve, A., & Salaff, J. W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. / Entrepreneurship theory and practice, / 28, 1鈥?2. CrossRef
  42. Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J.-C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors鈥?research performance. / Research Policy, / 34, 932鈥?50. CrossRef
  43. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organisational change. / American Sociological Review, / 49, 149鈥?64. CrossRef
  44. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). / Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  45. Harman, G. (2001). University-industry research partnerships in Australia: Extent, benefits and risks. / Higher Education Research & Development, / 20, 245鈥?64. CrossRef
  46. Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. / Technological Forecasting and Social Change, / 74, 413鈥?32. CrossRef
  47. Henderson, R. M. (1993). Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. / The Rand Journal of Economics, / 24, 248鈥?70. CrossRef
  48. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation鈥攖he reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. / Administrative Science Quarterly, / 35, 9鈥?0. CrossRef
  49. Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. / Research Policy, / 37, 740鈥?60. CrossRef
  50. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. / Journal of Management, / 35, 1404鈥?427. CrossRef
  51. Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. / Public Opinion Quarterly, / 15, 635鈥?50. CrossRef
  52. Howells, J. (2002). The response of old technology incumbents to technological competition鈥擠oes the sailing ship effect exist? / Journal of Management Studies, / 39, 887鈥?06. CrossRef
  53. Hu茅tink, F. J., der Vooren, A., & van Alkemade, F. (2010). Initial infrastructure development strategies for the transition to sustainable mobility. / Technological Forecasting and Social Change, / 77, 1270鈥?281. CrossRef
  54. Kleinknecht, A., & Verspagen, B. (1990). Demand and innovation: Schmookler re-examined. / Research Policy, / 19, 387鈥?94. CrossRef
  55. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. / Organization Science, / 3, 383鈥?97. CrossRef
  56. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). / Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
  57. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. / Strategic Management Journal, / 27, 131鈥?50. CrossRef
  58. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. / Social Studies of Science, / 35, 673鈥?02. CrossRef
  59. Lehmann, S., Jackson, A. D., & Lautrup, B. E. (2006). Measures for measures. / Nature, / 444, 1003鈥?004. CrossRef
  60. Lewin, A. Y., Weigelt, C. B., & Emery, J. D. (2004). Adaption and selection in strategy and change: Perspectives on strategic change in organizations. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), / Handbook of organizational change and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  61. Li, T., & Calantone, R. J. (1998). The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: Conceptualization and empirical examination. / The Journal of Marketing, 62, 13鈥?9.
  62. Liberman, S., & Wolf, K. B. (1998). Bonding number in scientific disciplines. / Social Networks, / 20, 239鈥?46. CrossRef
  63. Lieven, T., M眉hlmeier, S., Henkel, S., & Waller, J. F. (2011). Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany. / Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, / 16, 236鈥?43. CrossRef
  64. Lin, Z., Yang, H., & Arya, B. (2009). Alliance partners and firm performance: Resource complementarity and status association. / Strategic Management Journal, / 30, 921鈥?40. CrossRef
  65. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), / Frontiers in economics (pp. 105鈥?42). New York: Academic Press.
  66. Meeus, M. T. H., Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Hage, J. (2004). Industry-public knowledge infrastructure interaction: Intra- and Inter-organizational explanations of interactive learning. / Industry and Innovation, / 11, 327鈥?52. CrossRef
  67. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. / Science, / 159, 56鈥?3. CrossRef
  68. Minister of Economic Affairs. (2009). Regeling van de Minister van Economische Zaken van 30 oktober 2009, nr. WJZ/9166533, tot wijziging van de Subsidieregeling sterktes in innovatie. / Staatscourant 1鈥?.
  69. Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2009). Mobiliteitsbeleid (Mobility Policy).
  70. Morrow, K., Karner, D., & Francfort, J. (2008). / Plug- / in hybrid electric vehicle charging infrastructure review. US Department of Energy-Vehicle Technologies Program.
  71. Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. / Research Policy, / 8, 102鈥?53. CrossRef
  72. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). / An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap of Harvard University Press.
  73. Nieminen, M., Kaukonen, E. (2001). / Universities and R&D networking an a knowledge- / based economy. Sitra Reports.
  74. Nooteboom, B., & Stam, E. (2008). / Micro-foundations of innovation policy. Amsterdam: WRR, Amsterdam University Press.
  75. Penrose, E. T. (1959). / The theory of the growth of the firm. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  76. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). / The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Palo Alto: Stanford Business Books.
  77. Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades鈥?evidence. / Journal of Applied Social Psychology, / 34, 243鈥?81. CrossRef
  78. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. / Administrative Science Quarterly, / 41, 116鈥?45. CrossRef
  79. R Development Core Team. (2013). / R: A language and environment for statistical computing. www.R-project.org.
  80. Rao, R. S., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. (2008). The fruits of legitimacy: Why some new ventures gain more from innovation than others. / Journal of Marketing, / 72, 58鈥?5. CrossRef
  81. Renault, C. S. (2006). Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship. / The Journal of Technology Transfer, / 31, 227鈥?39. CrossRef
  82. Rieh, S. Y., & Danielson, D. R. (2007). Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. In B. Cronin (Ed.), / Annual review of information science and technology (pp. 307鈥?64). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  83. Rip, A. (1994). The republic of science in the 1990s. / Higher Education, / 28, 3鈥?3. CrossRef
  84. Rip, A. (2006). Folk theories of nanotechnologists. / Science as Culture, / 15, 349鈥?65. CrossRef
  85. Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry鈥搖niversity interactions. / Research Policy, / 31, 1163鈥?180. CrossRef
  86. Schilling, M. A., & Phelps, C. C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. / Management Science, / 53, 1113鈥?126. CrossRef
  87. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university鈥搃ndustry collaboration. / The Journal of High Technology Management Research, / 14, 111鈥?33. CrossRef
  88. Sorenson, O., & Fleming, L. (2004). Science and the diffusion of knowledge. / Research Policy, / 33, 1615鈥?634. CrossRef
  89. Sternthal, B., Ruby, D., & Leavitt, C. (1978). The persuasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive response. / Journal of Consumer Research, / 4, 252鈥?60. CrossRef
  90. Toutkoushian, R. K., Porter, S. R., Danielson, C., & Hollis, P. R. (2003). Using publications counts to measure an institution鈥檚 research productivity. / Research in Higher Education, / 44, 121鈥?48. CrossRef
  91. Van Lente, H. (1993). / Promising technology. The dynamics of expectations in technological developments. University of Twente, Enschede.
  92. Van Lente, H., & Bakker, S. (2010). Competing expectations: The case of hydrogen storage technologies. / Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, / 22, 693鈥?09. CrossRef
  93. Van Lente, H., & Rip, A. (1998). The rise of membrane technology from Rhetorics to social reality. / Social Studies of Science, / 28, 221鈥?54. CrossRef
  94. Van Merkerk, R. O., & Robinson, D. K. R. (2006). Characterizing the emergence of a technological field: Expectations, agendas and networks in Lab-on-a-chip technologies. / Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, / 18, 411鈥?28. CrossRef
  95. Van Rijnsoever, F. J., Farla, J., & Dijst, M. J. (2009). Consumer car preferences and information search channels. / Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, / 14, 334鈥?42. CrossRef
  96. Van Rijnsoever, F. J., Hagen, P., & Willems, M. (2013). Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles by Dutch local governments. / Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, / 20, 15鈥?0. CrossRef
  97. Van Rijnsoever, F. J., Hessels, L. K., & Vandeberg, R. L. J. (2008). A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. / Research Policy, / 37, 1255鈥?266. CrossRef
  98. Van Rijnsoever, F. J., Meeus, M. T. H., & Donders, R. T. (2012). The effects of economic status and recent experience on innovative behavior under environmental variability: An experimental approach. / Research Policy, / 41, 833鈥?47. CrossRef
  99. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). / Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
  100. Zambaldi, F., Aranha, F., Lopes, H., & Politi, R. (2011). Credit granting to small firms: A Brazilian case. / Journal of Business Research, / 64, 309鈥?15. CrossRef
  101. Zhang, J. (2010). The problems of using social networks in entrepreneurial resource acquisition. / International Small Business Journal, / 28, 338鈥?61. CrossRef
  102. Ziegler, A. (2012). Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: A discrete choice analysis for Germany. / Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, / 46, 1372鈥?385.
  
• 作者单位：Frank J. van Rijnsoever (1)
  Leon Welle (2)
  Sjoerd Bakker (3)
  
  1. Innovation Studies, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  2. Science and Innovation Management, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  3. OTB Research Institute, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5030, 2600 GA, Delft, The Netherlands
  
• ISSN：1573-7047

文摘

The aim of this paper is to empirically examine the influence of credibility on the likelihood to grant consortia of collaborating actors an innovation subsidy. Theorizing from the viewpoint of resource dependence theory and the sociology of expectations, we hypothesize that four types of credibility of influence: scientific credibility, market credibility, expectation track record, and generated social capital. We operate on two levels of analysis, the actor and the consortium. We quantitatively analyze the Dutch electric vehicle subsidy program as case. We develop a model that accurately forecasts which consortia are most likely to receive subsidies. We demonstrate that generated social capital and market credibility positively influence the likelihood of receiving innovation subsidies, while scientific credibility sources and expectation track record have a negative influence. Based on these findings we provide policy recommendations and avenues for further research.