Complete and Partial Organizing for Corporate Social Responsibility
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者：Andreas Rasche ; Frank G. A. de Bakker ; Jeremy Moon
  • 关键词：Organization studies ; Corporate social responsibility ; CSR standards ; Cross ; sector partnerships ; Partial organization ; Institutional theory ; Complete organization
  • 刊名：Journal of Business Ethics
  • 出版年：2013
  • 出版时间：July 2013
  • 年：2013
  • 卷：115
  • 期：4
  • 页码：651-663
  • 全文大小：231KB
  • 参考文献：1. Abbott, K. W. (2012). Engaging the public and the private in global sustainability governance. / International Affairs, / 88(3), 543-64. CrossRef
    2. Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. / International Organization, / 54(3), 401-19. CrossRef
    3. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. / Journal of Management, / 38(4), 932-68. CrossRef
    4. Ahrne, G. (1994). / Social organizations: Interaction, inside, outside and between organizations. London: Sage.
    5. Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2011). Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization. / Organization, / 18(1), 83-04. CrossRef
    6. Arenas, D., Sanchez, P., & Murphy, M. (2013). Different paths to collaboration between businesses and civil society and the role of third parties. / Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1829-5
    7. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. / Academy of Management Review, / 14(1), 20-9.
    8. Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. / Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, / 41(5), 726-58. CrossRef
    9. Babiak, K., & Thibault, L. (2008). Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. / Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, / 38(1), 117-43. CrossRef
    10. B?ckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. / European Environment, / 16(5), 290-06. CrossRef
    11. Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. / Critical Sociology, / 34(1), 51-9. CrossRef
    12. Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. / Academy of Management Review, / 33(1), 122-36. CrossRef
    13. Baumann-Pauly, D., Wickert, C., Spence, L. J., & Scherer, A. G. (2013). Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters. / Journal of Business Ethics. 10.1007/s10551-013-1827-7
    14. Beets, S. D., & Killough, L. N. (1990). The effectiveness of a complaint-based ethics enforcement system: Evidence from the accounting profession. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 9(2), 115-26. CrossRef
    15. Behnam, M., & MacLean, T. L. (2011). Where is the accountability in international accountability standards? A decoupling perspective. / Business Ethics Quarterly, / 21(1), 45-2. CrossRef
    16. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). / The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Doubleday.
    17. Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): form and implications. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 111(2), 281-99. CrossRef
    18. Brennan, N. M., Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Beelitz, A. (2013). Dialogism in corporate social responsibility communications: Conceptualizing verbal interaction between organisations and their audiences. / Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1825-9
    19. Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. / Social Cognition, / 11(1), 150-64. CrossRef
    20. Brickson, S. (2007). Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. / Academy of Management Review, / 32, 864-88. CrossRef
    21. Brunsson, N. (2006). / Mechanisms of hope: Maintaining the dream of the rational organization. Malm?: Copenhagen Business School Press.
    22. Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012). The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies. / Organization Studies, / 33, 613-32. CrossRef
    23. Burchell, J., & Cook, J. (2013). CSR, co-optation and resistance: The emergence of new agonistic relations between business and civil society. / Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1830-z
    24. Burns, J. M. (1979). / Leadership. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
    25. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. / Academy of Management Review, / 4(4), 497-05.
    26. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. / International Journal of Management Reviews, / 12(1), 85-05. CrossRef
    27. Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven country study of CSR website reporting. / Business and Society, / 44(4), 415-41. CrossRef
    28. Child, J. (2005). / Organization: Contemporary principles and practice. Malden: Blackwell.
    29. Christensen, L. T., & Cornelissen, J. P. (2011). Bridging corporate and organizational communication: Review, development and a look to the future. / Management Communication Quarterly, / 25(3), 383-14. CrossRef
    30. Coleman, W. D. (1997). Associational governance in a globalizing world: Weathering the storm. In J. R. Hollingsworth & R. Boyer (Eds.), / Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions (pp. 127-53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
    31. de Bakker, F. G. A. (2012). Exploring networks of activism on corporate social responsibility: Suggestions for a research agenda. / Creativity & Innovation Management, / 21(2), 212-23. CrossRef
    32. de Bakker, F. G. A., den Hond, F., King, B. G., & Weber, K. (2013). Social movements, civil society and corporations: Taking stock and looking ahead. / Organization Studies, / 34(5-), 573-93. CrossRef
    33. de Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., & den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30?years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. / Business & Society, / 44(3), 283-17. CrossRef
    34. den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism. How activist groups influence corporate social change. / Academy of Management Review, / 32(3), 901-24. CrossRef
    35. Egels-Zandén, N., & Wahlqvist, E. (2006). Post-partnership strategies for defining corporate responsibility: The business social compliance initiative. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 70(2), 175-89. CrossRef
    36. Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. / Organization Science, / 21(5), 1092-107. CrossRef
    37. Etzioni, A. (1964). / Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
    38. European Commission. (2011). / A renewed EU strategy 2011-014 for corporate social responsibility, COM (2011) 681 final. Brussels: European Commission.
    39. Fransen, L. (2012). Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: Legitimation politics in the institutional design of corporate social responsibility. / Socio-Economic Review, / 10, 163-92. CrossRef
    40. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 53(1), 51-1. CrossRef
    41. Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A., & Waddock, S. (2011). Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. / Business Ethics Quarterly, / 21(1), 23-4. CrossRef
    42. Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007). Discourse ethics and social accountability: The ethics of SA 8000. / Business Ethics Quarterly, / 17(2), 187-16. CrossRef
    43. Glasbergen, P. (2011). Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically: The ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool. / Environmental Policy and Governance, / 21(1), 1-3. CrossRef
    44. Gond, J.-P., & Boxenbaum, E. (2013). The glocalization of responsible investment: Contextualization work in France and Quebec. / Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1828-6
    45. Gond, J.-P., Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2011). The government of self-regulation: on the comparative dynamics of CSR. / Economy and Society, / 40(4), 640-71. CrossRef
    46. Gond, J.-P., & Moon, J. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in retrospect and prospect. In J.-P. Gond & J. Moon (Eds.), / Corporate social responsibility: A reader (pp. 1-8). London: Routledge.
    47. Googins, B. K., & Rochlin, S. A. (2000). Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. / Business and Society Review, / 105(1), 127-44. CrossRef
    48. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. / American Journal of Sociology, / 78(6), 1360-380. CrossRef
    49. Haug, C. (2013). Organizing spaces: Meeting arenas as a social movement infrastructure between organization, network, and institution. / Organization Studies, / 34(5-), 705-32. CrossRef
    50. Holder-Webb, L., & Cohen, J. (2012). The cut and paste society: Isomorphism in codes of ethics. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 107(4), 485-09. CrossRef
    51. Huntington, S. P. (1968). / Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    52. Husted, B. W. (2003). Governance choices for corporate social responsibility: To contribute, collaborate or internalize? / Long Range Planning, / 36, 481-98. CrossRef
    53. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2010). / ISO 26000:2010 guidance on social responsibility. ISO, Geneva.
    54. Jamali, D., Zanhour, M., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Peculiar strengths and relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 87, 355-77. CrossRef
    55. Kaptein, M., & Schwartz, M. (2008). The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 77(2), 111-27. CrossRef
    56. Kourula, A., & Laasonen, S. (2010). Nongovernmental organizations in business and society, management, and international business research: Review and implications from 1998 to 2007. / Business & Society, / 49(1), 35-7. CrossRef
    57. Langlois, C., & Schlegelmilch, B. (1990). Do corporate codes of ethics reflect national character? Evidence from Europe and the United States. / Journal of International Business Studies, / 21, 519-39. CrossRef
    58. Leipziger, D. (2003). / The corporate responsibility codebook. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
    59. Levy, D. L. (2008). Political contestation in global production networks. / Academy of Management Review, / 33(4), 943-63. CrossRef
    60. Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. / Journal of Management Studies, / 43, 115-36. CrossRef
    61. Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses-self-presentations. / Journal of International Business, / 33(3), 497-14. CrossRef
    62. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). / Organizations. New York: Wiley.
    63. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). ‘Implicit-and ‘explicit-CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. / Academy of Management Review, / 33(2), 404-24. CrossRef
    64. McGuire, J. (1963). / Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    65. Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1987). Accounting, and the construction of the governable person. / Accounting, Organizations and Society, / 12(3), 235-65. CrossRef
    66. Mintzberg, H. (1979). / The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
    67. Moon, J. (2014). / Corporate social responsibility: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    68. Moon, J. (2004). The institutionalisation of business social responsibility: Evidence from Australia and the UK. / The Anahuac Journal (Mexico), / 5(1), 40-4.
    69. Moon, J., & Vogel, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, government and civil society. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), / The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 303-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    70. Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. / Business Ethics Quarterly, / 15(3), 427-51.
    71. Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? / Social Research, / 66(3), 745-58.
    72. Nikoloyuk, J., Burns, T. R., & De Man, R. (2010). The promise and limitations of partnered governance: The case of sustainable palm oil. / Corporate Governance, / 10(1), 59-2. CrossRef
    73. O’Rourke, D. (2002). Monitoring the monitors: A critique of corporate third-party labor monitoring. In R. Jenkins, R. Pearson, & G. Seyfang (Eds.), / Corporate responsibility and ethical trade: Codes of conduct in the global economy (pp. 196-08). London: Earthscan.
    74. Ortmann, G. (2010). On drifting rules and standards. / Scandinavian Journal of Management, / 26(2), 204-14. CrossRef
    75. Pattberg, P. H. (2005). The institutionalization of private governance: How business and nonprofit organizations agree on transnational rules. / Governance, / 18(4), 589-10. CrossRef
    76. Peters, B. G. (1999). / Institutional theory in political science: the new institutionalism. London: Pinter.
    77. Petersen, L.-E., & Krings, F. (2009). Are ethical codes of conduct toothless tigers for dealing with employment discrimination? / Journal of Business Ethics, / 85(4), 501-14. CrossRef
    78. Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Waldman, D. A. (2012). Different approaches toward doing the right thing: Mapping the responsibility orientations of leaders. / Academy of Management Perspectives, / 26(4), 51-5. CrossRef
    79. Prakash, A., & Potoski, M. (2006). / The voluntary environmentalists: Green clubs, ISO 14001, and voluntary environmental regulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
    80. Rasche, A. (2012). Global policies and local practice: Loose and tight couplings in multi-stakeholder initiatives. / Business Ethics Quarterly, / 22(4), 679-08. CrossRef
    81. Rasche, A. (2010). The limits of corporate responsibility standards. / Business Ethics: A European Review, / 19(3), 280-91. CrossRef
    82. Rasche, A. (2009). ‘A necessary supplement- What the United Nations Global Compact is and is not. / Business & Society, / 48(4), 511-37. CrossRef
    83. Rasche, A., & Esser, D. (2006). From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 65(3), 251-67. CrossRef
    84. Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. / American Sociological Review, / 74(1), 63-2. CrossRef
    85. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. / Journal of Management Studies, / 48(4), 899-31. CrossRef
    86. Schultz, F., Castelló, I., & Morsing, M. (2013). The construction of corporate social responsibility in network societies: A communication view. / Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1826-8
    87. Seitanidi, M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalization of nonprofit-business partnerships. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 85, 413-29. CrossRef
    88. Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. / Journal of Management, / 31(6), 849-73. CrossRef
    89. Singh, J. B. (2011a). Determinants of the effectiveness of corporate codes of ethics: An empirical study. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 101, 385-95. CrossRef
    90. Singh, J. B. (2011b). Changes and trends in Canadian corporate ethics programs. / Business and Society Review, / 116(2), 257-76. CrossRef
    91. Slager, R., Gond, J.-P., & Moon, J. (2012). Standardization as institutional work: The regulative power of a responsible investment standard. / Organization Studies, / 33(5-), 763-90. CrossRef
    92. Stevens, J. M., Steensma, H. K., Harrison, D. A., & Cochran, P. L. (2005). Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives-decisions. / Strategic Management Journal, / 26(2), 181-95. CrossRef
    93. Strand, R. (2012). / In praise of Corporate Social Responsibility bureaucracy. Copenhagen Business School PhD Series (26.2012), Copenhagen.
    94. Strand, R. (2011). Exploring the role of leadership in corporate social responsibility: A review. / Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics, / 8(4), 84-6.
    95. Tamm Hallstr?m, K. (2008). ISO expands its business into social responsibility. In M. Bostr?m & C. Garsten (Eds.), / Organizing transnational accountability (pp. 46-0). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    96. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). / The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
    97. Trevi?o, L. K., & Ball, G. A. (1992). The social implications of punishing unethical behavior: Observers-cognitive and affective reactions. / Journal of Management, / 18, 751-68. CrossRef
    98. van Huijstee, M. M., Francken, M., & Leroy, P. (2007). Partnerships for sustainable development: A review of current literature. / Environmental Sciences, / 4(2), 75-9. CrossRef
    99. Weaver, G. R. (1995). Does ethics code design matter? Effects of ethics code rationales and sanctions on recipients-justice perceptions and content recall. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 14(5), 367-85. CrossRef
    100. Weber, M. (1968). / Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    101. Weick, K. E. (1979). / The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
    102. Whelan, G. (2013). Corporate constructed and dissent enabling public spheres: Differentiating dissensual from consensual corporate social responsibility. / Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1823-y
  • 作者单位：Andreas Rasche (1)
    Frank G. A. de Bakker (2)
    Jeremy Moon (3)

    1. Copenhagen Business School, CBS Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, Porcel?nshaven 18A, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark
    2. Department of Organisation Sciences, Faculty of Social Science, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    3. International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility (ICCSR), Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK
  • ISSN：1573-0697
文摘
This paper investigates different modes of organizing for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Based on insights from organization theory, we theorize two ways to organize for CSR. “Complete-organization for CSR happens within businesses and depends on the availability of certain organizational elements (e.g., membership, hierarchy, rules, monitoring, and sanctioning). By contrast, “partial-organization for CSR happens when organizers do not have direct access to all these organizational elements. We discuss partial organization for CSR by analyzing how standards and cross-sector partnerships make selective use of organizational elements. We maintain that an important feature of the increasing institutionalization of CSR—not only within businesses but also among non-governmental, governmental, and professional actors—is the rise of partial forms of organization. We discuss the contributions to this Special Issue in the context of our theorization of complete/partial organization for CSR and outline avenues for further research.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083

电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700