Ultrasound-guided breast-sparing surgery to improve cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. A prospective multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial comparing ultrasound-guided surgery to traditional palpation-guided surgery (COBALT trial)
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Nicole MA Krekel (1)
    Barbara M Zonderhuis (1)
    Hermien WH Schreurs (2)
    Alexander MF Lopes Cardozo (2)
    Herman Rijna (3)
    Henk van der Veen (4)
    Sandra Muller (4)
    Pieter Poortman (5)
    Louise de Widt (5)
    Wilfred K de Roos (6)
    Anne Marie Bosch (6)
    Annette HM Taets van Amerongen (7)
    Elisabeth Bergers (7)
    Mecheline HM van der Linden (8)
    Elly SM de Lange de Klerk (9)
    Henri AH Winters (10)
    Sybren Meijer (1)
    Petrousjka MP van den Tol (1)
  • 刊名:BMC Surgery
  • 出版年:2011
  • 出版时间:December 2011
  • 年:2011
  • 卷:11
  • 期:1
  • 全文大小:1246KB
  • 参考文献:1. / cijfers, overleving; borst 6th edition. Nederlands Kankerregistratie (NKR); 2003.
    2. Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, van Diest PJ, Boom RP, Meijer S: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. / J Am Coll Surg 1998, 186:275鈥?83. CrossRef
    3. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, / et al.: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. / N Engl J Med 2002, 347:1233鈥?241. CrossRef
    4. Rahusen FD, Pijpers R, van Diest PJ, Bleichrodt RP, Torrenga H, Meijer S: The implementation of the sentinel node biopsy as a routine procedure for patients with breast cancer. / Surgery 2000, 128:6鈥?2. CrossRef
    5. Veronesi U, Banfi A, Salvadori B, Luini A, Saccozzi R, Zucali R, / et al.: Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: long-term results of a randomized trial. / Eur J Cancer 1990, 26:668鈥?70. CrossRef
    6. Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW: Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? / Eur J Surg Oncol 1999, 25:571鈥?73. CrossRef
    7. Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, Kiebert G, Fentiman IS, Mignolet F, / et al.: Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. / Eur J Cancer 1998, 34:307鈥?14. CrossRef
    8. Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Yarnold JR, Broderick M, Regan J, Ross G, / et al.: Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning. / Radiother Oncol 1992, 25:160鈥?66. CrossRef
    9. Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK: Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. / J Clin Oncol 2008, 26:3331鈥?337. CrossRef
    10. Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW, Stewart J, Morgan AA: The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. / Eur J Surg Oncol 1999, 25:566鈥?70. CrossRef
    11. Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson ARM, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD: Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. / Br J Surg 2003, 90:1505鈥?509. CrossRef
    12. Fabry HFJ, Zonderhuis BM, Meijer S, Berkhof J, Van Leeuwen PAM, Van der Sijp JRM: Cosmetic outcome of breast conserving therapy after sentinel node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection. / Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005, 92:157鈥?62. CrossRef
    13. Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Yarnold JR, Broderick M, Regan J, Ross G, / et al.: Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 1. Comparison of patients' ratings, observers' ratings, and objective assessments. / Radiother Oncol 1992, 25:153鈥?59. CrossRef
    14. Taylor ME, Perez CA, Halverson KJ, Kuske RR, Philpott GW, Garcia DM, / et al.: Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. / Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995, 31:753鈥?64. CrossRef
    15. Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, Hoogenraad WJ, Horiot JH, Jager JJ, / et al.: The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC 'boost vs. no boost' trial. / Radiother Oncol 2000, 55:219鈥?32. CrossRef
    16. Kaufmann M, Morrow M, von Minckwitz G, Harris JR: Locoregional treatment of primary breast cancer: consensus recommendations from an International Expert Panel. / Cancer 2010, 116:1184鈥?191. CrossRef
    17. Meric F, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, Buchholz TA, Kuerer HM, Babiera GV, / et al.: Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy. / Cancer 2003, 97:926鈥?33. CrossRef
    18. Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, Recht A, Connolly J, Gelman R, / et al.: Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. / J Clin Oncol 2000, 18:1668鈥?675.
    19. Singletary SE: Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. / Am J Surg 2002, 184:383鈥?93. CrossRef
    20. Krekel NMA, Zonderhuis BM, Muller S, Bril H, van Slooten HJ, de Lange de Klerk ESM, / et al.: Excessive resections in breast-conserving surgery: A retrospective multicentre study. / Breast J 2011.,17(5):
    21. Harlow SP, Krag DN, Ames SE, Weaver DL: Intraoperative ultrasound localization to guide surgical excision of nonpalpable breast carcinoma. / J Am Coll Surg 1999, 189:241鈥?46. CrossRef
    22. Kaufman CS, Jacobson L, Bachman B, Kaufman LB: Intraoperative ultrasonography guidance is accurate and efficient according to results in 100 breast cancer patients. / Am J Surg 2003, 186:378鈥?82. CrossRef
    23. Luini A, Zurrida S, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Sacchini V, Monti S, / et al.: Comparison of radioguided excision with wire localization of occult breast lesions. / Br J Surg 1999, 86:522鈥?25. CrossRef
    24. Rahusen FD, Taets van Amerongen AH, van Diest PJ, Borgstein PJ, Bleichrodt RP, Meijer S: Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancers: A feasibility study looking at the accuracy of obtained margins. / J Surg Oncol 1999, 72:72鈥?6. CrossRef
    25. Rahusen FD, Bremers AJA, Fabry HFJ, van Amerongen AHMT, Boom RPA, Meijer S: Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial. / Ann Surg Oncol 2002, 9:994鈥?98. CrossRef
    26. Snider HCJ, Morrison DG: Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. / Ann Surg Oncol 1999, 6:308鈥?14. CrossRef
    27. Krekel NMA, Zonderhuis BM, Stockmann HBAC, Schreurs WH, van der Veen H, de Lange de Klerk ESM, / et al.: A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision. / Eur J Surg Oncol 2011, 37:109鈥?15.
    28. Moore MM, Whitney LA, Cerilli L, Imbrie JZ, Bunch M, Simpson VB, / et al.: Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal breast cancer. / Ann Surg 2001, 233:761鈥?68. CrossRef
    29. Leijendeckers PHH, Fortuin JB, van Herwijnen F, Schwippert GA: Wiskunde, Meetkunde; A2. In / Polytechnisch Zakboek. Elsevier; 2010:36鈥?7.
    30. Sacchini V, Luini A, Tana S, Lozza L, Galimberti V, Merson M, / et al.: Quantitative and qualitative cosmetic evaluation after conservative treatment for breast cancer. / Eur J Cancer 1991, 27:1395鈥?400. CrossRef
    31. Vrieling C, Collette L, Bartelink E, Borger JH, Brenninkmeyer SJ, Horiot JC, / et al.: Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. / Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999, 45:667鈥?76. CrossRef
    32. Rampaul RS, Macmillan RD, Evans AJ: Intraductal injection of the breast: a potential pitfall of radioisotope occult lesion localization. / Br J Radiol 2003, 76:425鈥?26. CrossRef
    33. Rampaul RS, Bagnall M, Burrell H, Pinder SE, Evans AJ, Macmillan RD: Randomized clinical trial comparing radioisotope occult lesion localization and wire-guided excision for biopsy of occult breast lesions. / Br J Surg 2004, 91:1575鈥?577. CrossRef
    34. van der Ploeg IMC, Hobbelink M, van den Bosch MAAJ, Mali WPT, Borel Rinkes IHM, van Hillegersberg R: 'Radioguided occult lesion localisation' (ROLL) for non-palpable breast lesions: a review of the relevant literature. / Eur J Surg Oncol 2008, 34:1鈥?.
    35. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/11/8/prepub
  • 作者单位:Nicole MA Krekel (1)
    Barbara M Zonderhuis (1)
    Hermien WH Schreurs (2)
    Alexander MF Lopes Cardozo (2)
    Herman Rijna (3)
    Henk van der Veen (4)
    Sandra Muller (4)
    Pieter Poortman (5)
    Louise de Widt (5)
    Wilfred K de Roos (6)
    Anne Marie Bosch (6)
    Annette HM Taets van Amerongen (7)
    Elisabeth Bergers (7)
    Mecheline HM van der Linden (8)
    Elly SM de Lange de Klerk (9)
    Henri AH Winters (10)
    Sybren Meijer (1)
    Petrousjka MP van den Tol (1)

    1. Department of Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
    2. Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
    3. Department of Surgical Oncology, Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
    4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, the Netherlands
    5. Department of Surgical Oncology, Waterland Hospital, Purmerend, the Netherlands
    6. Department of Surgical Oncology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
    7. Department of Radiology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
    8. Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
    9. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
    10. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
文摘
Background Breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer was developed as a method to preserve healthy breast tissue, thereby improving cosmetic outcomes. Thus far, the primary aim of breast-conserving surgery has been the achievement of tumour-free resection margins and prevention of local recurrence, whereas the cosmetic outcome has been considered less important. Large studies have reported poor cosmetic outcomes in 20-40% of patients after breast-conserving surgery, with the volume of the resected breast tissue being the major determinant. There is clear evidence for the efficacy of ultrasonography in the resection of nonpalpable tumours. Surgical resection of palpable breast cancer is performed with guidance by intra-operative palpation. These palpation-guided excisions often result in an unnecessarily wide resection of adjacent healthy breast tissue, while the rate of tumour-involved resection margins is still high. It is hypothesised that the use of intra-operative ultrasonography in the excision of palpable breast cancer will improve the ability to spare healthy breast tissue while maintaining or even improving the oncological margin status. The aim of this study is to compare ultrasound-guided surgery for palpable tumours with the standard palpation-guided surgery in terms of the extent of healthy breast tissue resection, the percentage of tumour-free margins, cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. Methods/design In this prospective multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial, 120 women who have been diagnosed with palpable early-stage (T1-2N0-1) primary invasive breast cancer and deemed suitable for breast-conserving surgery will be randomised between ultrasound-guided surgery and palpation-guided surgery. With this sample size, an expected 20% reduction of resected breast tissue and an 18% difference in tumour-free margins can be detected with a power of 80%. Secondary endpoints include cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. The rationale, study design and planned analyses are described. Conclusion The COBALT trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study to assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery in patients with palpable early-stage primary invasive breast cancer in terms of the sparing of breast tissue, oncological margin status, cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. Trial Registration Number Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR2579

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700