A survey of how patient-perceived empathy affects the relationship between health literacy and the understanding of information by orthopedic patients?

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Cheng-I Chu (1)
  Chia-Chih Alex Tseng (2)
  
• 关键词：Health literacy ; Patient ; perceived empathy ; Preoperative information understanding
• 刊名：BMC Public Health
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：December 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：13
• 期：1
• 全文大小：190KB
• 参考文献：1. Williams MV, Davis T, Parker RM, Weiss BD: The role of health literacy in patient-physician communication. / Fam Med 2002, 34:383-89.
  2. Williams MV, Parker RM, Baker DW, Parikh NS, Pitkin K, Coates WC, Nurss JR: Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. / JAMA 1995, 274:1677-682. CrossRef
  3. Miles S, Davis T: Patients who can’t read: implications for the health care system. / JAMA 1995, 274:1719-720. CrossRef
  4. Weiss BD, Coyne C: Communicating with patients who cannot read. / N Engl J Med 1997, 337:272-74. CrossRef
  5. Andrus MR, Roth MT: Health literacy: a review. / Pharmacotherapy 2002, 22:282-02. CrossRef
  6. Baker DW, Gazmararian JA, Williams MW, Scott T, Parker RM, Green D, Ren J, Peel J: Functional health literacy and the risk of hospital admission among Medicare managed care enrollees. / Am J Public Health 2002, 92:1278-283. CrossRef
  7. Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, Wang F, Osmond D, Daher C, Palacios J, Sullivan GD, Bindman AB: Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. / JAMA 2002, 288:475-82. CrossRef
  8. Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB: Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. / Soc Sci Med 1995, 40:903-18. CrossRef
  9. Nambisan P: Information seeking and social support in online health communities: impact on patients-perceived empathy. / J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011,18(3):298-04. CrossRef
  10. Hardee JT: An overview of empathy. / Permanente J 2003, 7:51-4.
  11. Smajdor A, St?ckl A, Salter C: The limits of empathy: problems in medical education and practice. / J Med Ethics 2011, 37:380-83. CrossRef
  12. Bellet PS, Maloney MJ: The importance of empathy as an interviewing skill in medicine. / JAMA 1991, 266:1831-832. CrossRef
  13. Larson EB, Yao X: Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship. / JAMA 2005, 293:1100-106. CrossRef
  14. Halpern J: / From detached concern to empathy: humanizing medical practice. New York City: Oxford University Press; 2001.
  15. Lin HS, Chen SS, Kuo ML, Huang C: / Health literacy in Taiwan: A pilot study. Taipei, Taiwan: Howard Civil Service International House; 2007. Taiwan Healthcare Joint Seminar, 2007
  16. Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW, Crouch MA: Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. / Fam Med 1993, 25:391-95.
  17. Fisher E: Low literacy levels in adults: implications for patient education. / J Cont Educ Nurs 1999, 30:56-1.
  18. Simmons J, Roberge L, Kendrick SB, Richards B: The interpersonal relationship in clinical practice. / Eval Health Prof 1995, 18:103-12. CrossRef
  19. Bernier MJ, Sanares DC, Owen SV, Newhouse PL: Preoperative teaching received and valued in a day surgery setting. / AORN J 2003, 77:563-72. 575-, 581- CrossRef
  20. Brumfield VC, Kee CC, Johnson JY: Preoperative patient teaching in ambulatory surgery settings. / AORN J 1996, 64:941-46. 948, 951- CrossRef
  21. Yount S, Schoessler M: A description of patient and nurse perceptions of preoperative teaching. / J Post Anesth Nurs 1991, 6:17-5.
  22. Bennett JA: Mediator and moderator variables in nursing research: conceptual and statistical differences. / Res Nurs Health 2000, 23:415-20. CrossRef
  23. Aiken LS, West SG: / Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991.
  24. Chen XP, Tsui AS, Farh JL, Cheng BS: / Empirical methods for research in organization and management. Taipei, Taiwan: Hwa Tai Publishing; 2008.
  25. Cohen J: Partialed products are interactions: partialed powers are curve components. / Psychol Bull 1978, 85:858-66. CrossRef
  26. Arnold HJ: Moderator variables: a clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues. / Organ Behav Hum Perform 1982, 29:143-74. CrossRef
  27. Stone EF, Hollenbeck JR: Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: empirical evidence and related evidence. / J Appl Psychol 1989, 74:3-0. CrossRef
  28. Suchman AL, Markakis K, Beckman HB, Frankel R: A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. / JAMA 1997, 277:678-82. CrossRef
  29. Levinson W, Gorawara-Bhat R, Lamb J: A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. / JAMA 2000, 284:1021-027. CrossRef
  30. Meade CD, Smith CF: Readability formulas: cautions and criteria. / Patient Educ Couns 1991, 17:153-58. CrossRef
  31. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/155/prepub
  
• 作者单位：Cheng-I Chu (1)
  Chia-Chih Alex Tseng (2)
  
  1. Department of Public Health, Tzu Chi University, 701, Sec. 3, Zhongyang Rd, Hualien City, Hualien County, 97004, Taiwan
  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan
  
• ISSN：1471-2458

文摘

Background There is a lack of research examining patient-perceived empathy and its effect on low-literacy patients-understanding of health information. This study investigated the moderating effect of patient-perceived empathy on the relationship between health literacy and understanding of preoperative information. Methods During a 2-month period, a total of 144 patients took a survey that included the Chinese-edition Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory and the Preoperative Information Understanding Scale. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis provided a test of moderator effects. Results All Cronbach’s alphas exceeded 0.6, with REALM at 0.91, BLRI at 0.67, and PIUS at 0.77.The finding that the interaction term was significant suggests perceived empathy is a relevant factor when considering the relationship between health literacy and the understanding of information by patients. The relationship between the health literacy and understanding of information was stronger and positive among patients who perceived greater empathy from their physicians. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that a focus on improving physician–patient empathy skills could be beneficial in helping to overcome the negative consequences associated with limited health-literacy capabilities. Healthcare providers who wish to improve the understanding of information by low health-literacy patients should first identify components of their empathic communication mechanisms, and then try to refine these skills to better serve their patients.