Different recognition cues reveal the decision rules used for egg rejection by hosts of a variably mimetic avian brood parasite
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:M. Alicia de la Colina (1) madelacolina@ege.fcen.uba.ar
    Lorena Pompilio (1)
    Mark E. Hauber (2)
    Juan C. Reboreda (1)
    Bettina Mahler (1)
  • 关键词:Chalk ; browed Mockingbird – ; Shiny Cowbird – ; Egg rejection – ; Antiparasite defenses – ; Eggshell spotting
  • 刊名:Animal Cognition
  • 出版年:2012
  • 出版时间:September 2012
  • 年:2012
  • 卷:15
  • 期:5
  • 页码:881-889
  • 全文大小:269.5 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, R酶skaft E (2009) Evidence for egg discrimination preceding failed rejection attempts in a small cuckoo host. Biol Lett 5:166–171
    2. Avil茅s JM, Rutila J, Moller AP (2005) Should the redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) accept or reject cuckoo eggs? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:608–617
    3. Avil茅s JM, Soler JJ, P茅rez-Contreras T (2006) Dark nests and egg colour in birds: a possible functional role of ultraviolet reflectance in egg detectability. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2821–2829
    4. Avil茅s JM, Vikan J, Foss酶y F, Antonov A, Mosknes A, R酶skaft E, Stokke BG (2010) Avian colour perception predicts behavioural responses to experimental brood parasitism in chaffinches. J Evol Biol 23:293–301
    5. Bowmaker JK, Heath LA, Wilkie SE, Hunt DM (1997) Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptor in the retinas of birds. Vision Res 37:2183–2194
    6. Cassey P, Honza M, Grim T, Hauber ME (2008) The modelling of avian visual perception predicts behavioural rejection responses to foreign egg colours. Biol Lett 4:515–517
    7. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T and AD Poyser, London
    8. Davies NB (2011) Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning. J Zool 284:1–14
    9. de la Colina MA, Mahler B, Reboreda JC (2011) Differences in morphology and colour pattern of shiny cowbird (Molothrus bonariensis) eggs found in nests of two hosts. Biol J Linn Soc 102:838–845
    10. De M谩rsico MC, Mahler B, Chomnalez M, Di Giacomo AG, Reboreda JC (2010) Host use by generalist and specialist brood parasitic cowbirds at population and individual levels. Adv Study Behav 42:83–121
    11. Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC (2006) Cues used by shiny cowbirds (Molothrus bonariensis) to locate and parasitise chalk-browed mockingbird (Mimus saturninus) nests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:379–385
    12. Fiorini VD, Tuero DT, Reboreda JC (2009) Host behaviour and nest-site characteristics affect the likelihood of brood parasitism by shiny cowbirds on chalk-browed mockingbirds. Behav 146:1387–1403
    13. Fraga RM (1985) Host–parasite interactions between chalk-browed mockingbirds and shiny cowbirds. Ornithol Monog 36:829–844
    14. Friedmann H (1929) The cowbirds: a study in the biology of social parasitism. C.C.Thomas, Springfield
    15. Gloag R, Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC, Kacelnik A (2012) Brood parasite eggs enhance egg survivorship in a multiply parasitized host. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:1831–1839
    16. Grim T (2007) Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:373–381
    17. Grim T, Samaš P, Mosk谩t C, Kleven O, Honza M, Moksnes A, R酶skaft E, Stokke BG (2011) Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts? J Anim Ecol 80:508–518
    18. Gross MR (1996) Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:92–98
    19. Hauber ME (2002) Is reduced clutch size a cost of parental care in Eastern Phoebes (Sayornis phoebe)? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:503–509
    20. Hauber ME (2003) Hatching asynchrony, nestling competition, and the cost of interspecific brood parasitism. Behav Ecol 14:224–235
    21. Hauber ME, Mosk谩t C, B谩n M (2006) Experimental shift in hosts’ acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs. Biol Lett 2:177–180
    22. Holen 脴H, Johnstone RA (2004) The evolution of mimicry under constraints. Am Nat 164:598–613
    23. Honza M, Polačikov谩 L (2008) Experimental reduction of ultraviolet wavelength reflected from parasitic eggs affects rejection behaviour in the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla. J Exp Biol 211:2519–2523
    24. Honza M, Polačikov谩 L, Prochazka P (2007) Ultraviolet and green parts of the colour spectrum affect egg rejection in the song thrush (Turdus philomelos). Biol J Linn Soc 92:269–276
    25. Honza M, Proch谩zka P, Morongov谩 K, Čapek M, Jel铆nek V (2011) Do nest light conditions affect rejection of parasitic eggs? A test of the light environment hypothesis. Ethology 117:539–546
    26. Hoover JP (2003) Multiple effects of brood parasitism reduce the reproductive success of prothonotary warblers, Protonotaria citrea. Anim Behav 65:923934
    27. Hudson WH (1874) Notes on the procreant instincts of the three species of Molothrus found in Buenos Aires. Proc Zool Soc 11:153–174
    28. Igic B, Cassey P, Grim T, Greenwood DR, Mosk谩t C, Rutila J, Hauber ME (2011) A shared chemical basis of avian host–parasite egg colour mimicry. Proc R Soc B. doi:
    29. Kilner RM, Langmore NE (2011) Cuckoos versus hosts in insects and birds: adaptations, counter-adaptations and outcomes. Biol Rev 86:836–852
    30. Lahti DC (2006) Persistence of egg recognition in the absence of cuckoo brood parasitism: pattern and mechanism. Evolution 60:157–168
    31. Lahti DC, Lahti AR (2002) How precise is egg discrimination in weaverbirds? Anim Behav 63:1135–1142
    32. Langmore NE, Hunt S, Kilner RM (2003) Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature 422:157–160
    33. Langmore NE, Kilner RM, Butchart SHM, Maurer G, Davies NB, Cockburn A, Macgregor NA, Peters A, Magrath MJL, Dowling DK (2005) The evolution of egg rejection by cuckoo hosts in Australia and Europe. Behav Ecol 16(4):686–692
    34. Lindholm AK (2000) Tests of phenotypic plasticity in reed warbler defences against cuckoo parasitism. Behav 137:43–60
    35. L贸pez-de-Hierro MDG, Moreno-Rueda G (2010) Egg-spot pattern rather than egg colour affects conspecific egg rejection in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:317–324
    36. Lotem A (1993) Learning to recognize nestlings is maladaptive for cuckoo Cuculus canorus host. Nature 362:743–745
    37. Lowther PE (2011) Lists of victims and hosts of the parasitic Cowbirds, Version 03 March 2011. The Field Museum, Chicago. http://fm1.fieldmuseum.org/aa/Files/lowther/CBList.pdf
    38. Mahler B, Confalonieri VA, Lovette IJ, Reboreda JC (2008) Eggshell spotting in brood parasitic shiny cowbirds (Molothrus bonariensis) is not linked to the female sex chromosome. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1193–1199
    39. Marchetti K (2000) Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim Behav 59:877–885
    40. Mason P (1986) Brood parasitism in a host generalist, the shiny cowbird: I. The quality of different species as hosts. Auk 103:52–60
    41. McLean IG, Maloney RF (1998) Brood parasitism, recognition, and response: the options. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts, studies in coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 255–269
    42. Moksnes A, R酶skaft E, Braa AT (1991) Rejection behaviour by common cuckoo hosts towards artificial brood parasite eggs. Auk 108:348–354
    43. Mosk谩t C, Hauber ME (2007) Conflict between egg recognition and egg rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts. Anim Cogn 10:377–386
    44. Mosk谩t C, Szekely T, Cuthill IC, Kisbenedek T (2008) Hosts’ responses to parasitic eggs: which cues elicit hosts’ egg discrimination? Ethology 114:186–194
    45. Mosk谩t C, B谩n M, Sz茅kely T, Komdeur J, Lucassen RWG, van Boheemen AL, Hauber ME (2010) Discordancy or template-based recognition? Dissecting the cognitive basis of the rejection of foreign eggs in hosts of avian brood parasites. J Exp Biol 213:1976–1983
    46. Nolan JV, Thompson CF (1978) Egg volume as a predictor of hatchling weight in the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater). Wilson Bull 90:353–355
    47. 脴ien IJ, Moksnes A, R酶skaft E, Honza M (1998) Costs of Cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism to Reed Warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. J Avian Biol 29:209–215
    48. Osorio D, Ham AD (2002) Spectral reflectance and directional properties of structural coloration in bird plumage. J Exp Biol 205:2017–2027
    49. Payne RB, Payne LL (1998) Nestling eviction and vocal begging behaviors in Australian glossy cuckoos Chrysococcyx basalis and C. lucidus. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts, studies in coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 152–169
    50. Peer BD, Sealy SG (2004) Correlates of egg rejection in hosts of the brown-headed cowbird. Condor 106:580–599
    51. Polačikov谩 L, Grim T (2010) Blunt egg pole holds cues for alien egg discrimination: experimental evidence. J Avian Biol 41:111–116
    52. Polačikov谩 L, Hauber ME, Prochazka P, Cassey P, Honza M, Grim T (2011) A sum of its parts? Relative contributions of different eggshell regions to intraclutch variation in birds. J Avian Biol 42:370–373
    53. Pompilio L, Kacelnik A (2010) Context dependent utility overrides absolute memory as a determinant of choice. PNAS 107:508–512
    54. Reboreda JC, Mermoz ME, Massoni V, Asti茅 AA, Rabuffetti FL (2003) Impacto del parasitismo de cr铆a del Tordo Renegrido (Molothrus bonariensis) sobre el 茅xito reproductivo de sus hospedadores. Hornero 18:7788
    55. Reeve H (1989) The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am Nat 133:407435
    56. R酶skaft E, Moksnes A, Stokke BG, Mosk谩t C, Honza M (2002a) The spatial habitat structure of host populations explains the pattern of rejection behaviour in hosts and parasitic adaptations in cuckoos. Behav Ecol 13:163168
    57. R酶skaft E, Moksnes A, Meilvang D, Bicık V, Jemelıkova J, Honza M (2002b) No evidence for recognition errors in Acrocephalus warblers. J Avian Biol 33:31–38
    58. Rothstein SI (1974) Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: possible learned and innate factors. Auk 91:796–807
    59. Rothstein SI (1982) Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: which egg parameters elicit responses by rejecter species? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:229–239
    60. Rothstein SI (1990) A model system for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:481–508
    61. Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (1998) Major unanswered questions in the study of avian brood parasitism. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts, studies in coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 419–425
    62. Sackmann P, Reboreda JC (2003) A comparative study of shiny cowbird parasitism in two large hosts: chalk-browed mockingbird and rufous-belied thrush. Condor 105:728–736
    63. Safran RJ, Vitousek MN (2008) Evolutionary biology: arms races in the eye of the beholder. Curr Biol 18:734–736
    64. Samaš P, Hauber ME, Cassey P, Grim T (2011) Repeatability of foreign egg rejection: testing the assumptions of co-evolutionary theory. Ethology 117:606–619
    65. Schuetz JG (2005) Reduced growth but not survival of chicks with altered gape patterns: implications for the evolution of nestling similarity in a parasitic finch. Anim Behav 70:839–848
    66. Schulze-Hagen K, Stokke BG, Birkhead TR (2009) Reproductive biology of the European cuckoo Cuculus canorus: early insights, persistent errors and the acquisition of knowledge. J Ornithol 150:1–16
    67. Servedio M, Hauber ME (2006) To eject or to abandon? Brood parasite virulence and host clutch sizes interact to influence the fitness payoffs of alternative rejection strategies. J Evol Biol 19:1585–1594
    68. Servedio MR, Lande R (2003) Coevolution of an avian host and its parasitic cuckoo. Evolution 57:1164–1175
    69. Spottiswoode C, Stevens M (2010) Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs. PNAS 19:8672–8676
    70. Stoddard MC, Stevens M (2010) Pattern mimicry of host eggs by the common cuckoo, as seen through a bird’s eye. Proc R Soc B 277:1387–1393
    71. Stoddard MC, Stevens M (2011) Avian vision and the evolution of egg color mimicry in the common cuckoo. Evolution 65:2004–2013
    72. Stokke BG, Moksnes A, R酶skaft E (2005) The enigma of imperfect adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites. Ornithol Sci 4:17–29
    73. Tokue K, Ueda K (2010) Mangrove Gerygones Gerygone laevigaster eject Little Bronze-cuckoo Chalcites minutillus hatchlings from parasitized nests. Ibis 152:835–839
    74. Tuero DT, Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC (2007) Effects of shiny cowbird parasitism on different components of house wren reproductive success. Ibis 149:521–529
    75. Underwood TJ, Sealy SG (2006) Parameters of brown-headed cowbird Molothrus ater egg discrimination in warbling vireos Vireo gilvus. J Avian Biol 37:457–466
    76. Vikan JR, Stokke BG, Foss酶y F, Jackson C, Huhta E, Rutila J, Moksnes A, R酶skaft E (2009) Fixed rejection responses to single and multiple experimental parasitism in two Fringilla hosts of the common cuckoo. Ethology 115:840–850
    77. Wedell DH (1991) Distinguishing among models of contextually induced preference reversals. J Exp Psych Learn Mem Cogn 17:767–778
  • 作者单位:1. Departamento de Ecolog铆a, Gen茅tica y Evoluci贸n, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabell贸n II Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EGA Buenos Aires, Argentina2. Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, USA
  • ISSN:1435-9456
文摘
Brood parasitism imposes several fitness costs on the host species. To reduce these costs, hosts of avian brood parasites have evolved various defenses, of which egg rejection is the most prevalent. In the face of variable host-parasite mimicry and the costs of egg discrimination itself, many hosts reject only some foreign eggs. Here, we experimentally varied the recognition cues to study the underlying cognitive mechanisms used by the Chalk-browed Mockingbird (Mimus saturninus) to reject the white immaculate eggs laid by the parasitic Shiny Cowbird (Molothrus bonariensis). Immaculate eggs are the only parasite eggs rejected by this host, as it accepts all polymorphic, spotted eggs laid by cowbirds. Using a within-breeding pair experimental design, we tested for the salience of spotting, UV reflectance, and brightness in eliciting rejection. We found that the presence of spotting significantly decreased the probability of rejection while increments in brightness significantly increased rejection frequencies. The cognitive rules underlying mockingbird rejection behavior can be explained by a decision-making model which predicts changes in the levels of rejection in direct relation to the number of relevant attributes shared between host and parasite eggs.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700