Functional Response of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to Sugarcane Whitefly Aleurolobus barodensis (Maskell) in Laboratory Conditions

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Amjad Sultan (1)
  M. Farhanullah Khan (2)
  
• 关键词：Functional response ; Chrysoperla carnea ; sugarcane whitefly ; biological control
• 刊名：Journal of Insect Behavior
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：July 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：27
• 期：4
• 页码：454-461
• 全文大小：
• 参考文献：1. Abd El-Gawad HAS, Sayed AMM, Ahmed SA (2010) Functional response of / Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) larvae to / Phthorimaea operculella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) eggs. AJBAS J 4:2182-187
  2. Anonymous (2006) http://dacnet.nic.in/sugaracane/pest management.htm
  3. Atl?han R, Kaydan B, ?zg?k?e M (2004) Feeding activity and life history characteristics of the generalist predator, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) at different prey densities. J Pest Sci 77(1):17-1 CrossRef
  4. De Clercq P, Mohaghegh J, Tirry L (2000) Effect of host plant on the functional response of the predator / Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Biol Control 18:65-0 CrossRef
  5. Debach P (1965) Some biological and ecological phenomena associate with colonizing entomophagous insects. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) Genetics of colonizing species. Academic, New York, pp 287-06
  6. Fathipour Y, Jaafari A (2003) Functional response of predators / Nabis capsiformis and / Chrysoperla carnea to different densities of / Creontiades pallidus nymphs. J Agric Sci Nat Resour 10:125-33
  7. Fernandez-Arhex V, Corley JC (2003) The functional response of parasitoids and its implications for biological control. Biocontrol Sci Technol 13:403-13 CrossRef
  8. Gautam RD, Tesfaye A (2002) Potential of green lacewing, / Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) in crop pest management. New Agric 13(1/2):147-58
  9. Hassanpour M, Nouri-Ganbalani G, Mohaghegh J, Enkegaard A (2009) Functional response of different larval instars of the green lacewing, / Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), to the two-spotted spider mite, / Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). J Food Agric Environ 7(2):424-28
  10. Hassanpour M, Mohaghegh J, Iranipour S, Nouri-Ganbalani G, Enkegaard A (2011) Functional response of / Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae) to / Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): effect of prey and predator stages. Insect Sci 8:217-24 CrossRef
  11. Hassell MP (1978) The dynamics of arthropod predator–prey systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 237
  12. Holling CS (1959) The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can Entomol 91:293-20 CrossRef
  13. Hughes RD, Woolcok LT, Hughes MA (1992) Laboratory evaluation of the parasitic Hymenoptera used in attempts to biologically control aphid pests of crops in Australia. Entomol Exp Appl 63:177-85 CrossRef
  14. Jervis AM (2005) Foraging behavior. In: Jervis A, New M (eds) Insect as natural enemies. Springer, Netherlands, pp 49-1 CrossRef
  15. Juliano SA (2001) Non-linear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, New York
  16. Kanchannainwal (2009) http://agropedia.iitk.ac.in/?q=content/whiteflySymptomssugarcane
  17. Khan AA, Zaki FA (2008) Predatory response of / Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) feeding on the Euonymus aphid, / Aphis fabae solanella Theobald (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Kashmir. Indian J Biol Control 22(1):149-54
  18. Madadi H, Enkegaard A, Br?dsgaard HF, Kharrazi-Pakdel A, Mohaghegh J, Ashouri A (2007) Host plant effects on the functional response of / Neoseiulus cucumeris to onion thrips larvae. J Appl Entomol 131:728-73 CrossRef
  19. Mandour NS, El-Basha NAS, Liu TX (2006) Functional response of the ladybird, / Cydonia icina nilotica to cowpea aphid, / Aphis craccivora in the laboratory. Insect Sci 13:49-4 CrossRef
  20. Munyaneza J, Obrycki JJ (1997) Functional response of Coleomegilla maculate (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Colorado potato beetle eggs (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Biol Control 8:215-24 CrossRef
  21. Murdoch WW (1973) The functional response of predators. J Appl Ecol 10:335-42
  22. O’Neil RJ (1989) Comparison of laboratory and field measurements of the functional response of / Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 62:148-55
  23. Parajulee MN, Shrestha RB, Leser JF, Wester DB, Blanco CA (2006) Evaluation of the functional response of selected arthropod predator on bollworm eggs in the laboratory and effect of temperature on their predation efficiency. Environ Entomol 35(2):379-86 CrossRef
  24. Singh NN, Manoj K (2000) Potentiality of / Chrysoperla carnea in suppression of mustard aphid population. Indian J Entomol 62:323-26
  25. Stark SB, Witford F (1987) Functional response of / Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) larvae feeding on / Heliothis virescens (Lep:Noctuidae) eggs on cotton in field cages. Entomophaga 32(5):521-27 CrossRef
  26. Tamina M, Khan AA (2010) Functional and aggregational response of Chrysoperla sp. (carnea-group) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on Brevicoryne brassicae (Linnaeus) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Indian J Biol Control 24(1):28-4
  
• 作者单位：Amjad Sultan (1)
  M. Farhanullah Khan (2)
  
  1. Department of Agriculture and Agribusiness Management, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
  2. Departments of Zoology, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
  
• ISSN：1572-8889

文摘

A functional response study of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) larvae to different densities of sugar cane whitefly Aleurolobus barodensis (Maskell) was conducted in test tubes at 26?±-?°C, 65?±-?% RH. Chrysoperla carnea showed two different types of functional response in larval instars. First instar exhibits type II. However, second and third larval instars revealed type III functional response. Based on modified Holling’s disk equation, the highest searching rates (a) of 0.82?±-.0247?h? was found for first instar larva. For second and third larval instars, the attack coefficient (b) were 0.002?±-.030 and 0.0025?±-.0424 respectively. The shortest handling time (Th) per prey was observed at third instar stage (1.574?±-.0568?h) followed by second and first instar with 1.72?±-.0411?h and 1.919?±-.0568?h respectively.