Networks of Innovation and Competitiveness: A Triple Helix Case Study
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Luís Farinha ; João Ferreira ; Borges Gouveia
- 关键词：Competitiveness ; Innovation ; Entrepreneurship ; Networking ; Academia–industry cooperation ; Triple Helix
- 刊名：Journal of the Knowledge Economy
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：March 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：7
- 期：1
- 页码：259-275
- 全文大小：640 KB
- 参考文献：Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2009). University–industry collaboration in Italy: a bibliometric examination. Technovation, 29(6–7), 498–507. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.11.003 .CrossRef
Aguirre, I. D. P., Parellada, F. S., & Campos, H. M. (2006). University spin-off programmes: how can they support the NTBF creation? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(2), 157–172. doi:10.1007/s11365-006-8682-2 .CrossRef
Aloysius, J. a. (2002). Research joint ventures: a cooperative game for competitors. European Journal of Operational Research, 136(3), 591–602. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00064-9 .CrossRef
Arranz, N., & Fdez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2008). The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Technovation, 28(1-2), 88–100. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.006 .CrossRef
Audretsch, D. B. (2004). Sustaining innovation and growth: public policy support for entrepreneurship. Industry & Innovation, 11(3), 167–191. doi:10.1080/1366271042000265366 .CrossRef
Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 587–601. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9332-9 .CrossRef
Awazu, Y. (2006). Managing technology alliances: the case for knowledge management. International Journal of Information Management, 26(6), 484–493. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.07.005 .CrossRef
Barratt, M., Choi, T. Y., & Li, M. (2011). Qualitative case studies in operations management: trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. Journal of Operations Management, 29(4), 329–342. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.002 .CrossRef
Baxter, J., & Chua, W. F. (2003). Alternative management accounting research—whence and whither. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 97–126.CrossRef
Beach, R., Muhlemann, A. P., Price, D. H. R., Paterson, A., & Sharp, J. A. (2001). The role of qualitative methods in production management research. International Journal of Production Economics, 74(1-3), 201–212. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00127-X .CrossRef
Bernasconi, A. (2005). University entrepreneurship in a developing country: the case of the P. Universidad Católica de Chile, 1985–2000. Higher Education, 50(2), 247–274. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6353-1 .CrossRef
Bjerregaard, T. (2010). Industry and academia in convergence: micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration. Technovation, 30(2), 100–108. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.11.002 .CrossRef
Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006 .CrossRef
Budd, L., & Hirmisf, K. (2004). Conceptual framework for regional competitiveness. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1015–1028. doi:10.1080/tl034340042000292) .CrossRef
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2. doi:10.1186/2192-5372-1-2 .CrossRef
Carlsson, B., & Mudambi, R. (2003). Globalization, entrepreneurship, and public policy: a systems view. Industry & Innovation, 10(1), 103–116. doi:10.1080/1366271032000068122 .CrossRef
Chesbrough, H. (2007). Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy & Leadership, 35(6), 12–17. doi:10.1108/10878570710833714 .CrossRef
Crespo, M., & Dridi, H. (2006). Intensification of university–industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54(1), 61–84. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9046-0 .CrossRef
Dayasindhu, N. (2002). Embeddedness, knowledge transfer, industry clusters and global competitiveness : a case study of the Indian software industry. Technovation, 22, 551–560.CrossRef
Doganova, L., & Eyquem-renault, M. (2009). What do business models do ? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship, 38, 1559–1570. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002 .
Etzkowitz, H. (2003a). Research groups as ““quasi-firms””: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32, 109–121.CrossRef
Etzkowitz, H. (2003b). Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337. doi:10.1177/05390184030423002 .CrossRef
Etzkowitz, H., & Dzisah, J. (2008). Rethinking development: circulation in the triple helix. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(6), 653–666. doi:10.1080/09537320802426309 .CrossRef
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ““Mode 2”” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Science And Technology, 109–123.
Farinha, L., & Ferreira, J. (2012). Triangulation of the Triple Helix: a conceptual framework for regional competitiveness focused on innovation and local entrepreneurship. In Triple Helix 10th Internacional Conference 2012 (Ed.), Emerging Triple Helix Models for Developing Countries (pp. 487–501). Bandung, Indonesia: Penerbit ITB.
Giuliani, E., & Arza, V. (2009). What drives the formation of “valuable” university–industry linkages? Research Policy, 38(6), 906–921. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.006 .CrossRef
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Discovery of substantive theory: a basic strategy underlying qualitative research. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(6), 5–12. doi:10.1177/000276426500800602 .CrossRef
Greve, C. (2013). Ideas in public management reform for the 2010s. Digitalization, value creation and involvement. Public Organization Review. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0253-8 .
Horowitz Gassol, J. (2007). The effect of university culture and stakeholders’ perceptions on university–business linking activities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(5), 489–507. doi:10.1007/s10961-007-9035-1 .CrossRef
Johnson, W. (2008). Roles, resources and benefits of intermediate organizations supporting triple helix collaborative R&D: the case of Precarn. Technovation, 28(8), 495–505. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.007 .CrossRef
Kelley, D., Bosma, N., & Amorós, J. E. (2010). The global competitiveness report 2010-2011. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (p. 85). Geneva. Retrieved from www.gemconsortium.org
Ketels, C. H. M. (2006). Michael Porter’s competitiveness framework—recent learnings and new research priorities. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 6(2), 115–136. doi:10.1007/s10842-006-9474-7 .CrossRef
Klofsten, M., & Jones-evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe—the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14, 299–309.CrossRef
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Rherrad, I. (2006). Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities. Research Policy, 35(10), 1599–1615. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.020 .CrossRef
Lawton Smith, H., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2010). Triple helix and regional development: a perspective from Oxfordshire in the UK. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 805–818. doi:10.1080/09537325.2010.511143 .CrossRef
Leydesdorff, L. (2011). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, and an N-Tuple of Helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy. doi:10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4 .
Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems—introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35(10), 1441–1449. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016 .CrossRef
Lundberg, H., & Andresen, E. (2012). Cooperation among companies, universities and local government in a Swedish context. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(3), 429–437. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.017 .CrossRef
Luukkonen, T. (1998). The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programmes. Research Policy, 27(6), 599–610. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00058-4 .CrossRef
Malmström, M. (2014). Typologies of bootstrap financing behavior in small ventures. Venture Capital, 16(1), 27–50. doi:10.1080/13691066.2013.863064 .CrossRef
Marques, J. P. C., Caraça, J. M. G., & Diz, H. (2006). How can university–industry–government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal?—the case of the University of Coimbra. Technovation, 26(4), 534–542. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.04.005 .CrossRef
Meyer, M. S., & Tang, P. (2007). Exploring the “value” of academic patents: IP management practices in UK universities and their implications for third-stream indicators. Scientometrics, 70(2), 415–440. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0210-9 .CrossRef
Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: how entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35(10), 1499–1508. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023 .CrossRef
Nijkamp, P. (2003). Entrepreneurship in a modern network economy. Regional Studies, 37(4), 395–405. doi:10.1080/0034340032000074424 .CrossRef
Nilsson, A. S., Rickne, A., & Bengtsson, L. (2009). Transfer of academic research: uncovering the grey zone. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 617–636. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9124-4 .CrossRef
Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011). Subsidy and networking: the effects of direct and indirect support programs of the cluster policy. Research Policy, 40(5), 714–727. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.011 .CrossRef
Nissan, E., Galindo Martín, M.-Á., & Méndez Picazo, M.-T. (2011). Relationship between organizations, institutions, entrepreneurship and economic growth process. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(3), 311–324. doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0191-2 .CrossRef
Nordqvist, M., & Melin, L. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(3–4), 211–239. doi:10.1080/08985621003726119 .CrossRef
Ojewale, B. A., Ilori, M. O., Oyebisi, T. O., & Akinwumi, I. O. (2001). Industry–academic relation: utilization of idle capacities in polytechnics, universities and research organizations by entrepreneurs in Nigeria. Technovation, 21, 695–704.CrossRef
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 .CrossRef
Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2001). Innovation: location matters. Management.
Ranga, L. M., Debackere, K., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2003). Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: a case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium. Scientometrics, 58(2), 301–320.CrossRef
Salvador, E. (2010). Are science parks and incubators good “brand names” for spin-offs? The case study of Turin. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 203–232. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9152-0 .CrossRef
Sarkar, S., & Costa, A. (2008). Dynamics of open innovation in the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19(11), 574–580. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2008.09.006 .CrossRef
Schwab, K. (2011). The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012. (G. E. Monitor, Ed.)World Economic Forum (pp. 1–554). Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Semlinger, K. (2008). Cooperation and competition in network governance: regional networks in a globalised economy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 20(6), 547–560. doi:10.1080/08985620802462157 .CrossRef
Sharabati-Shahin, M. H. N., & Thiruchelvam, K. (2013). The role of Diaspora in university–industry relationships in globalised knowledge economy: the case of Palestine. Higher Education, 65, 613–629. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9566-8 .CrossRef
Soete, B., & Stephan, A. (2004). Introduction: entrepreneurship, innovation and growth. Industry & Innovation, 11(3), 161–165. doi:10.1080/1366271042000265357 .CrossRef
Solleiro, J. L., & Castañón, R. (2005). Competitiveness and innovation systems: the challenges for Mexico’s insertion in the global context. Technovation, 25(9), 1059–1070. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.005 .CrossRef
Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2011). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 31(1), 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.003 .CrossRef
Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41, 537–562. doi:10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9 .CrossRef
Storbacka, K. (2011). Industrial marketing management a solution business model: capabilities and management practices for integrated solutions. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(5), 699–711. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.05.003 .CrossRef
Strand, Ø., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Where is synergy indicated in the Norwegian innovation system? Triple-Helix relations among technology, organization, and geography. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 471–484. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.010 .CrossRef
Tee, N. P. (2005). Innovation and enterprise in Singapore schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 3(3), 183–198. doi:10.1007/s10671-004-8240-z .CrossRef
Tödtling, F., Prud, P., & Reine, V. (2011). Open innovation and regional culture—findings from different industrial and regional settings. European Planning Studies, 19(11), 1885–1907.CrossRef
Turok, I. (2004). Cities, regions and competitiveness. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1069–1083. doi:10.1080/0034340042000292647 .CrossRef
Wessner, C. W. (2002). Entrepreneurial finance and the new economy. Venture Capital, 4(4), 349–355. doi:10.1080/1369106022000024987 .CrossRef
Wong, C.-Y., & Goh, K.-L. (2012). The sustainability of functionality development of science and technology: papers and patents of emerging economies. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 55–65. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.07.001 .CrossRef
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 335–350. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-2000-1 .CrossRef
Wong, P.-K., Ho, Y.-P., & Singh, A. (2007). Towards an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge-based economic development: the case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941–958. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.007 .CrossRef
Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003 .CrossRef
Zerbinati, S. (2012). Multi-level governance and EU structural funds: an entrepreneurial local government perspective. Local Government Studies, 38(5), 577–597. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.649914 .CrossRef
Zhou, J. (2013). Digitalization and intelligentization of manufacturing industry. Advances in Manufacturing, 1(1), 1–7. doi:10.1007/s40436-013-0006-5 .CrossRef
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004 .CrossRef - 作者单位：Luís Farinha (1) (2)
João Ferreira (3)
Borges Gouveia (4)
1. Department of Management and Economics, University of Beira Interior (UBI), Covilhã, Portugal
2. Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco, Portugal
3. Department of Management and Economics and Research Centre in Business Sciences (NECE), University of Beira Interior (UBI), Covilhã, Portugal
4. Department of Economics, Management and Industrial Engineering, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal - 刊物主题：Economic Policy; R & D/Technology Policy; Entrepreneurship;
- 出版者：Springer US
- ISSN：1868-7873
文摘
This paper aims to study the knowledge and technology transfer processes taking place in cooperation between academia and industry cooperation through an EU-funded R & D project. We follow a qualitative research methodology through a case study, incorporating interviews with the institutional actors involved (university, industry and government) in the cooperation project. While this study is limited to a case study, it does, however, highlight the importance of Triple Helix networks in order to develop research, development and innovation (RDI) initiatives and their commercialization and correspondingly enabling the identification of both potential opportunities and constraints in the process. Through the practical perspective of a successful Triple Helix cooperation case study, we were able to develop an innovative and continuous olive harvesting machine in order to satisfy a real need in the Mediterranean market. Inserted within the context of the triangulation of the Triple Helix model, this paper demonstrates the importance of RDI cooperation networks and the consequent commercialization of new tradable products with positive consequences to regional competitiveness.