Erstspracherwerbsforschung und Spracherwerbstheorien

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：S. Miller (1)
  M. Jungheim (1)
  M. Ptok (1)
  
• 关键词：Spracherwerb ; Sprachentwicklung ; Nativismus ; Kognitivismus ; Behaviorismus ; Language acquisition ; Language development ; Nativism ; Cognitivism ; Behaviorism
• 刊名：HNO
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：April 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：62
• 期：4
• 页码：242-248
• 全文大小：
• 参考文献：1. Liebi R (2007) Herkunft und Entwicklung der Sprachen. Linguistik contra Evolution, 3.?Aufl. H?nssler, Holzgerlingen
  2. Terrace HS, Petitto LA, Sanders RJ et al (1979) Can an ape create a sentence? Science 206:891-02 CrossRef
  3. Müller HM (Hrsg) (2002) Arbeitsbuch Linguistik. Sch?ningh, Paderborn
  4. Linke A, Nussbaumer M, Portmann PR (1996) Studienbuch Linguistik, 3. unver?nderte Aufl. Niemeyer, Tübingen
  5. Szagun G (2013) Sprachentwicklung beim Kind. Ein Lehrbuch. Beltz, Weinheim
  6. Kuhl PK (2004) Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:831-43 CrossRef
  7. Rohmann H, Aguado K (2002) Der Spracherwerb: Das Erlernen von Sprache. In: Horst Müller M (Hrsg) Arbeitsbuch Linguistik. Sch?ningh, Paderborn, S?263-85
  8. Haid A (2009) Die Parametersetzung im kindlichen Spracherwerb. Diplomarbeit im Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft der Universit?t Wien
  9. Klann-Delius G (1999) Spracherwerb. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart
  10. Kany W, Schr?ler H (2014) Theorien zum Spracherwerb. In: Ahnert L (Hrsg) Theorien in der Entwicklungspsychologie. Springer, Berlin, S?468-85
  11. Hoehle B (2005) Der Einstieg in die Grammatik: Spracherwerb w?hrend des ersten Lebensjahres. Forum Logop 6:16-1
  12. Klein W, Meibauer J (2011) Einleitung. Lili Z Literaturwiss Linguist 41:5-
  13. Bickes H, Pauli U (2009) Erst- und Zweitspracherwerb. Fink, Paderborn
  14. Bu?mann H (Hrsg) (2002) Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft, 3.?Aufl. Kr?ner, Stuttgart
  15. Wirth G (2000) Entwicklung der kindlichen Sprache. In: Wirth G (Hrsg) Sprachst?rungen, Sprechst?rungen, kindliche H?rst?rungen, 5.?Aufl. überarb v M. Ptok und R. Sch?nweiler. Deutscher ?rzte-Verlag, K?ln, S?115-58
  16. Szagun G (1996) Sprachentwicklung beim Kind. Psychologie Verlags Union, Weinheim
  17. Wygotski LS (1969) Denken und Sprechen. Fischer, Frankfurt am Main
  18. Jahn T (2001, 2007) Phonologische St?rungen bei Kindern: Diagnostik und Therapie. Thieme, Stuttgart
  19. Chomsky N (1959) A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language 35:26-8 CrossRef
  20. Chomsky N (2002) On nature and language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  21. Wild KT, Betancourt LM, Brodsky NL et al (2013) The effect of socioeconomic status on the language outcome of preterm infants at toddler age. Early Hum Dev 89:743-46 CrossRef
  22. Prevoo MJ, Malda M, Mesman J et al (2013) Predicting ethnic minority children’s vocabulary from socioeconomic status, maternal language and home reading input: different pathways for host and ethnic language. J Child Lang 1-2
  23. Richels CG, Johnson KN, Walden TA et al (2013) Socioeconomic status, parental education, vocabulary and language skills of children who stutter. J Commun Disord 46:361-74 CrossRef
  24. Weisleder A, Fernald A (2013) Talking to children matters: early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychol Sci 24:2143-152 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：S. Miller (1)
  M. Jungheim (1)
  M. Ptok (1)
  
  1. Klinik für Phoniatrie und P?daudiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, MHH. OE 6510, 30623, Hannover, Deutschland
  
• ISSN：1433-0458

文摘

Background In principle, a child can seemingly easily acquire any given language. First language acquisition follows a certain pattern which to some extent is found to be language independent. Since time immemorial, it has been of interest why children are able to acquire language so easily. Different disciplinary and methodological orientations addressing this question can be identified. Methods A selective literature search in PubMed and Scopus was carried out and relevant monographies were considered. Results Different, partially overlapping phases can be distinguished in language acquisition research: whereas in ancient times, deprivation experiments were carried out to discover the “original human language- the era of diary studies began in the mid-19th century. From the mid-1920s onwards, behaviouristic paradigms dominated this field of research; interests were focussed on the determination of normal, average language acquisition. The subsequent linguistic period was strongly influenced by the nativist view of Chomsky and the constructivist concepts of Piaget. Speech comprehension, the role of speech input and the relevance of genetic disposition became the centre of attention. The interactionist concept led to a revival of the convergence theory according to Stern. Discussion Each of these four major theories—behaviourism, cognitivism, interactionism and nativism—have given valuable and unique impulses, but no single theory is universally accepted to provide an explanation of all aspects of language acquisition. Moreover, it can be critically questioned whether clinicians consciously refer to one of these theories in daily routine work and whether therapies are then based on this concept. It remains to be seen whether or not new theories of grammar, such as the so-called construction grammar (CxG), will eventually change the general concept of language acquisition.