Evaluation of a new screening-level risk assessment tool applied to non-indigenous marine invertebrates in Canadian coastal waters

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：David Drolet ; Claudio DiBacco ; Andrea Locke ; Cynthia H. McKenzie…
• 关键词：Weed Risk Assessment ; Aquatic invasive species ; Non ; indigenous species ; Management ; Uncertainty ; Marine invertebrates
• 刊名：Biological Invasions
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：January 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：18
• 期：1
• 页码：279-294
• 全文大小：992 KB
• 参考文献：Acosta H, Wu D, Forrest BM (2010) Fuzzy experts on recreational vessels, a risk modelling approach for marine invasions. Ecol Model 221:850–863. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ecolmodel.​2009.​11.​025 CrossRef
  Barry SC, Hayes KR, Hewitt CL, Dragsund E, Bakke SM (2008) Ballast water risk assessment: principles, processes, and methods. ICES J Mar Sci 65:121–131. doi:10.​1093/​icesjms/​fsn004 CrossRef
  Blackburn TM, Essl F, Evans T, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Marková Z, Mrugala A, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Ricciardi A, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Winter M, Genovesi P, Bacher S (2014) A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biol 12:e1001850. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pbio.​1001850 PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef
  Bomford M, Glover J (2004) Risk assessment model for the import and keeping of exotic freshwater and estuarine finfish. Report of the Australian Bureau of Rural Sciences, p 125
  Bomford M, Kraus F, Braysher M, Walter L, Brown L (2005) Risk assessment model for the import and keeping of exotic reptiles and amphibians. Report of the Australian Bureau of Rural Sciences, p 110
  Caley P, Kuhnert PM (2006) Application and evaluations of classification trees for screening unwanted plants. Austral Ecol 31:647–655. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1442-9993.​2006.​01617.​x CrossRef
  Clarke Murray C, Therriault TW, Pakhomov E (2013) What lies beneath? An evaluation of rapid assessment tools for management of hull fouling. Environ Manag 52:374–384. doi:10.​1007/​s00267-013-0085-x CrossRef
  Copp GH, Vilizzi L, Mumford J, Fenwick GV, Godard MJ, Gozlan RE (2009) Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater fishes. Risk Anal 29:457–467. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1539-6924.​2008.​01159.​x PubMed CrossRef
  Crosti R, Cascone C, Cipollaro S (2010) Use of a weed risk assessment for the Mediterranean region of Central Italy to prevent loss of functionality and biodiversity in agro-ecosystems. Biol Invasions 12:1607–1616. doi:10.​1007/​s10530-009-9573-6 CrossRef
  Daehler CC, Carino DA (2000) Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biol Invasions 2:93–102. doi:10.​1023/​A:​1010002005024 CrossRef
  Daehler CC, Virtue JG (2010) Likelihood and consequences: reframing the Australian weed risk assessment to reflect a standard model of risk. Plant Prot Q 25:52–55
  Daehler CC, Denslow J, Ansari S, Kuo H-C (2004) A risk-assessment system for screening out invasive pest plants from Hawaii and other Pacific islands. Conserv Biol 18:360–368. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1523-1739.​2004.​00066.​x CrossRef
  DFO (2009) Development of a framework and principles for the biogeographic classification of Canadian marine areas. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Science Advisory Report 2009/056, p 17
  Floerl O, Inglis GJ, Hayden BJ (2005) A risk-based predictive tool to prevent accidental introductions of nonindigenous marine species. Environ Manag 35:765–778. doi:10.​1007/​s00267-004-0193-8 CrossRef
  Gordon DR, Gantz CA (2008) Screening new plant introductions for potential invasiveness: a test of impact for the United States. Conserv Lett 1:227–235. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1755-263X.​2008.​00032.​x CrossRef
  Gordon DR, Gantz CA (2011) Risk assessment for invasiveness differs for aquatic and terrestrial plant species. Biol Invasions 13:1829–1842. doi:10.​1007/​s10530-011-0002-2 CrossRef
  Gordon DR, Onderdonk DA, Fox AM, Stocker RK, Gantz C (2008a) Predicting invasive plants in Florida using the Australian weed risk assessment. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:178–195. doi:10.​1614/​IPSM-07-037.​1 CrossRef
  Gordon DR, Onderdonk DA, Fox AM, Stocker RK (2008b) Consistent accuracy of the Australian weed risk assessment system across varied geographies. Divers Distrib 14:234–242. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1472-4642.​2007.​00460.​x CrossRef
  Gordon DR, Gantz CA, Jerde CL, Chadderton WL, Keller RP, Champion PD (2012) Weed risk assessment for aquatic plants: modification of a New Zealand system for the United States. PLoS ONE 7:e40031. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0040031 PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef
  Grosholz E (2002) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:22–27CrossRef
  Hayes RH, Sliwa C (2003) Identifying potential marine pests: a deductive approach applied to Australia. Mar Pollut Bull 46:91–98. doi:10.​1016/​S0025-326X(02)00321-1 PubMed CrossRef
  Holt J, Leach AW, Knight JD, Griessinger D, MacLeod A, van der Gaag DJ, Schrader G, Mumford JD (2012) Tools for visualizing and integrating pest risk assessment ratings and uncertainties. EPPO Bull 42:35–41. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2338.​2012.​02548.​x CrossRef
  Holt J, Leach AW, Schrader G, Petter F, MacLeod A, van der Gaag DJ, Baker RHA, Mumford JD (2014) Eliciting and combining decision criteria using a limited palette of utility functions and uncertainty distributions: illustrated by application to pest risk analysis. Risk Anal 34:4–16. doi:10.​1111/​risa.​12089 CrossRef
  Hughes G, Madden LV (2003) Evaluating predictive models with application in regulatory policy for invasive weeds. Agric Syst 76:755–774. doi:10.​1016/​S0308-521X(02)00164-6 CrossRef
  IASWG (Invasive Alien Species Working Group) (2009) Alberta invasive alien species risk assessment tool. Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development, Edmonton, p 65
  ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea) (2005) ICES code of practice on the introductions and transfers of marine organisms. ICES, Copenhagen, p 30
  Kato H, Hata K, Yamamoto H, Yoshioka T (2006) Effectiveness of the weed risk assessment system for the Bonin Islands. In: Koike F, Clout MN, Kawamichi M, De Poorter M, Iwatsuki K (eds) Assessment and control of biological invasion risks. Shoukadoh Book Sellers, Kyoto, and IUCN, Gland, pp 65–72
  Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204. doi:10.​1016/​S0169-5347(01)02101-2 PubMed CrossRef
  Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236. doi:10.​1126/​science.​1075753 PubMed CrossRef
  Koop AL, Fowler L, Newton LP, Caton BP (2012) Development and validation of a weed screening tool for the United States. Biol Invasions 14:273–294. doi:10.​1007/​s10530-011-0061-4 CrossRef
  Kumschick S, Richardson DM (2013) Species-based risk assessments for biological invasions: advances and challenges. Divers Distrib 19:1095–1105. doi:10.​1111/​ddi.​12110 CrossRef
  Kumschick S, Bacher S, Dawson W, Heikkilä J, Sendek A, Pluess T, Robinson TB, Kühn I (2012) A conceptual framework for prioritization of invasive alien species for management according to their impact. NeoBiota 15:69–100. doi:10.​3897/​neobiota.​15.​3323 CrossRef
  Leung B, Roura-Pascual N, Bacher S, Heikkilä J, Brotons L, Burbman MA, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Essl F, Hulme PE, Richardson DM, Sol D, Vilà M, Rejmanek M (2012) TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices. Ecol Lett 15:1475–1493. doi:10.​1111/​ele.​12003 PubMed CrossRef
  Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG (2004) A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol Lett 7:975–989. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1461-0248.​2004.​00657.​x CrossRef
  Locke A (2009) A screening procedure for potential tunicate invaders of Atlantic Canada. Aquat Invasions 4:71–79. doi:10.​3391/​ai.​2009.​4.​1.​7 CrossRef
  Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228. doi:10.​1016/​j.​tree.​2005.​02.​004 PubMed CrossRef
  Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536. doi:10.​1890/​0012-9658(1999)080[1522:​GPOPIA]2.​0.​CO;2 CrossRef
  McClay A, Sissons A, Wilson C, David S (2010) Evaluation of the Australian weed risk assessment system for the prediction of plant invasiveness in Canada. Biol Invasions 12:4085–4098. doi:10.​1007/​s10530-010-9819-3 CrossRef
  Miller AW, Ruiz GM, Minton MS, Ambrose RF (2007) Differentiating successful and failed molluscan invaders in estuarine ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 332:41–51. doi:10.​3354/​meps332041 CrossRef
  Nentwig W, Kühnel E, Bacher S (2010) A generic impact-scoring system applied to alien mammals in Europe. Conserv Biol 24:302–311. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1523-1739.​2009.​01289.​x PubMed CrossRef
  Nyberg CD, Wallentinus I (2005) Can species traits be used to predict marine macroalgal introductions? Biol Invasions 7:265–279. doi:10.​1007/​s10530-004-0738-z CrossRef
  Pheloung PC (1995) Determining the weed potential of new plant introductions to Australia: a report on the development of a weed risk assessment system commissioned by the Australian Weeds Commission and the Plant Industries Committee. Agricultural Protection Board, Western Australia, p 36
  Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR (1999) A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J Eviron Manag 57:239–251. doi:10.​1006/​jema.​1999.​0297
  Regan HM, Colyvan M, Burgman MA (2002) A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Appl 12:618–628. doi:10.​1890/​1051-0761(2002)012[0618:​ATATOU]2.​0.​CO;2 CrossRef
  Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11:193–203. doi:10.​1046/​j.​1523-1739.​1997.​95473.​x CrossRef
  Rejmanek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661. doi:10.​2307/​2265768 CrossRef
  Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Carlton JT, Wonham MJ, Hines AH (2000) Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:481–531. http://​www.​jstor.​org/​stable/​221741
  Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102. doi:10.​1146/​annurev.​ecolsys.​110308.​120304 CrossRef
  Therriault TW, Herborg L-M (2007) Risk assessment for two solitary and three colonial tunicates in both Atlantic and Pacific Canadian Waters. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Science Research Document 2007/063, p 64
  Therriault TW, Herborg L-M, Locke A, McKindsey CW (2008a) Risk Assessment for European green crab (Carcinus maenas) in Canadian Waters. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Science Research Document 2008/042, p 40
  Therriault TW, Herborg L-M, Locke A, McKindsey CW (2008b) Risk Assessment for Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) in Canadian Waters. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Science Research Document 2008/041, p 33
  Tricarico E, Vilizzi L, Gherardi F, Copp GH (2010) Calibration of FI-ISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater invertebrates. Risk Anal 30:285–292. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1539-6924.​2009.​01255.​x PubMed CrossRef
  USDA (2015) Guidelines for the USDA-APHIS-PPQ weed risk assessment process. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), 125 pp
  Weigle SM, Smith LD, Carlton JT, Pederson J (2005) Assessing the risk of introducing exotic species via the live marine species trade. Conserv Biol 19:213–223. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1523-1739.​2005.​00412.​x CrossRef
  Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
  
• 作者单位：David Drolet (1)
  Claudio DiBacco (2)
  Andrea Locke (3)
  Cynthia H. McKenzie (4)
  Christopher W. McKindsey (1)
  Andrea M. Moore (2)
  Janis L. Webb (5)
  Thomas W. Therriault (5)
  
  1. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Institut Maurice-Lamontagne, Mont-Joli, QC, G5H 3Z4, Canada
  2. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, NS, B2Y 4A2, Canada
  3. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Gulf Fisheries Centre, Moncton, NB, E1C 9B6, Canada
  4. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, St. John ‘s, NL, A1C 5X1, Canada
  5. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, BC, V9T 6N7, Canada
  
• 刊物类别：Biomedical and Life Sciences
• 刊物主题：Life Sciences
  Plant Sciences
  Ecology
  Hydrobiology
  Zoology
  Forestry
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-1464

文摘

Screening-level risk assessment tools for non-indigenous species are useful to inform management and policy decisions. While a number of tools have been developed to evaluate the risk of introductions in terrestrial and freshwater environments, only one tool is available for marine invertebrates [Marine Invertebrate Invasiveness Scoring Kit (MI-ISK)] and it has not been calibrated or evaluated previously. This paper introduces the Canadian Marine Invasive Screening Tool (CMIST), a tool based on a series of questions related to the sequence of events in the invasion process. We assessed the performance of both CMIST and MI-ISK using 60 species/ecosystem combinations of non-indigenous marine invertebrate species known to have been introduced to three Canadian marine ecoregions. Assessment scores were compared to the results of an expert opinion survey about the level of ecological risk posed by these species in these ecoregions. In addition, a simple way to quantify uncertainty and compute confidence limits surrounding expert evaluations and CMIST scores is presented; the technique could be incorporated into other existing tools. The risk scores returned by the two tools generally were similar, had comparable levels of inter-assessor variability, and correlated well with the results of the expert opinion survey for two of the three ecoregions. In the third ecoregion, we believe the lack of highly problematic species and greater uncertainty (linked to less reliable information) contributed to the weaker correlation. For all ecoregions, CMIST scores were more strongly correlated with expert opinion scores when compared to MI-ISK scores. Finally, we demonstrate how CMIST can be used for new incursions; for each ecoregion we scored 15 additional species not yet introduced and compared these scores with those of species already present. Overall CMIST is a promising screening-level tool; it distinguishes between elements of invasion risk (likelihood and impact), has fewer questions to score than similar tools, and could easily be adapted for other taxa. Keywords Weed Risk Assessment Aquatic invasive species Non-indigenous species Management Uncertainty Marine invertebrates