Nonlinear seismic analysis of unsymmetric-plan structures retrofitted by hysteretic damped braces
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Fabio Mazza
  • 关键词:Unsymmetric ; plan framed structures ; Equivalent biaxial viscous damping ; Extended N2 method ; Hysteretic dampers ; Displacement ; based design ; Nonlinear static and dynamic analyses
  • 刊名:Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
  • 出版年:2016
  • 出版时间:April 2016
  • 年:2016
  • 卷:14
  • 期:4
  • 页码:1311-1331
  • 全文大小:2,561 KB
  • 参考文献:Anagnostopoulos SA, Kyrkos MT, Stathopoulos KG (2015) Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: critical review and state of the art. Earthq Struct 8(2):305–377CrossRef
    Baratta A, Corbi I, Corbi O, Mastorakis N (2015) Strategies for the protection from structural failures under seismic events. Int J Mech 9:69–75
    Calvi GM (2013) Choices and criteria for seismic strengthening. J Earthq Eng 17(6):769–802CrossRef
    Chopra AK, Goel RK (2004) A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33:903–927CrossRef
    Christopoulos C, Filiatrault A (2006) Principles of passive supplemental damping and seismic isolation. IUSS Press, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia, Italy
    De la Llera JC, Almazán JL, Vial IJ (2005) Torsional balance of plan-asymmetric structures with friction dampers: analytical results. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:1089–1108CrossRef
    De Stefano M, Pintucchi B (2010) Predicting torsion-induced lateral displacements for pushover analysis: influence of torsional system characteristics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39:1369–1394
    Dwairi HM, Kowalsky MJ, Nau JM (2007) Equivalent damping in support of direct displacement-based design. J Earthq Eng 11:512–530CrossRef
    EN15129 (2009). Antiseismic devices. C.E.N., European Committee for Standardization
    Eurocode 8 (2003) Design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. C.E.N. European Committee for Standardization 2003
    Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:979–993CrossRef
    Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA 356 (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia
    Foti D (2014) Response of frames seismically protected with passive systems in near-field areas. Int J Struct Eng 5(4):326–345CrossRef
    Fujii K (2015) Application of the pushover-based procedure to predict the largest peak response of asymmetric buildings with buckling-restrained braces. In: COMPDYN 2015, 5th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, Crete Island, Greece, May 25–27, paper n. 836
    Goel RK (2000) Seismic behaviour of asymmetric buildings with supplemental damping. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29:461–480CrossRef
    Goel RK (2005) Seismic response of linear and non-linear asymmetric systems with non-linear fluid viscous dampers. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(7):825–846CrossRef
    Jacobsen LS (1930) Steady forced vibrations as influenced by damping. ASME Trans 52(1):169–181
    Kim J, Bang S (2002) Optimum distribution of added viscoelastic dampers for mitigation of torsional responses of plan-wise asymmetric structures. Eng Struct 24(10):1257–1269CrossRef
    Kreslin M, Fajfar P (2012) The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation. Bull Earthq Eng 10:695–715CrossRef
    Lin W, Chopra AK (2001) Understanding and predicting effects of supplemental viscous damping on seismic response of asymmetric one-storey systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30:1475–1494CrossRef
    Marino I, Petti L (2011) Seismic assessment of asymmetric structures behaviour by using static non-linear analysis. J Civ Eng Archit 5(5):402–411
    Mazza F (2014a) Displacement-based seismic design of hysteretic damped braces for retrofitting in-plan irregular r.c. framed structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 66:231–240CrossRef
    Mazza F (2014b) Modeling and nonlinear static analysis of reinforced concrete framed buildings irregular in plan. Eng Struct 80:98–108CrossRef
    Mazza F (2015a) Comparative study of the seismic response of RC framed buildings retrofitted using modern techniques. Earthq Struct 9(1):29–48CrossRef
    Mazza F (2015b) Seismic vulnerability and retrofitting by damped braces of fire-damaged r.c. framed buildings. Eng Struct 101:179–192CrossRef
    Mazza F, Mazza M (2010) Nonlinear analysis of spatial framed structures by a lumped plasticity model based on the HaarKàrmàn principle. Comput Mech 45:647–664CrossRef
    Mazza F, Vulcano A (2007) Control of the along-wind response of steel framed buildings by using viscoelastic or friction dampers. Wind Struct 10(3):233–247CrossRef
    Mazza F, Vulcano A (2014) Equivalent viscous damping for displacement-based seismic design of hysteretic damped braces for retrofitting framed buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 12(6):2797–2819CrossRef
    Mazza F, Mazza M, Vulcano A (2014) Displacement-based seismic design of hysteretic damped braces for retrofitting in-elevation irregular r.c. framed structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 69:115–124CrossRef
    Mevada SV (2015) Seismic response control of multi-story asymmetric building installed with dampers. Adv Struct Eng 2:1295–1309
    NTC08 (2008). Italian Ministry of Infrastructures. Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni e relative istruzioni. D.M.14-01-2008 e Circolare 02-02-2009, n. 617/C.S.LL.PP (in Italian)
    Petti L, De Iuliis M (2008) Torsional seismic response control of asymmetric-plan systems by using viscous dampers. Eng Struct 30(11):3377–3388CrossRef
    Petti L, Marino I, Cuoco L (2008). Seismic response analysis of 3D structures through simplified non-linear procedures. In: Proceedings of the 14th World conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China, paper n. 285
    Ponzo FC, Di Cesare A, Nigro D, Vulcano A, Mazza F, Dolce M, Moroni C (2012) JET-PACS project: dynamic experimental tests and numerical results obtained for a steel frame equipped with hysteretic damped chevron braces. J Earthq Eng 16:662–685CrossRef
    REte dei Laboratori Universitari di Ingegneria Sismica (2014) Linee guida di progettazione per strutture con sistemi di dissipazione di energia: esempi applicativi. Report DPC-RELUIS 1: 1–168 (in Italian)
    Rodrigues H, Varum H, Arêde A, Costa A (2012) A comparative analysis of energy dissipation and equivalent viscous damping of RC columns subjected to uniaxial and biaxial loading. Eng Struct 35:149–164CrossRef
    Royal Decree-Law No. 2105 (1937) Technical building regulations, with special prescriptions for localities affected by earthquakes (in Italian)
    Royal Decree-Law No. 2229 (1939) Regulations for the construction of not reinforced and reinforced buildings (in Italian)
    Royal Decree-Law No. 640 (1935) New text of the Technical Building Regulations, with special prescriptions for localities affected by earthquakes (in Italian)
    Smerzini C, Galasso C, Iervolino I, Paolucci R (2014) Ground motion record selection based on broadband spectral compatibility. Earthq Spectra 30(4):1427–1448CrossRef
    Sorace S, Terenzi G (2012) Dissipative bracing-based seismic retrofit of R/C school buildings. Open Constr Build Technol J 6:334–345CrossRef
    Sorace S, Terenzi G (2014) Motion control-based seismic retrofit solutions for a R/C school building designed with earlier technical standards. Bull Earthq Eng 12:2723–2744CrossRef
    Teruna DR, Majid TA, Budiono B (2015). Experimental study of hysteretic steel damper for energy dissipation capacity. Adv Civ Eng 15:1–12, paper n. 631726
    Thermou GE, Elnashai AS (2006) Seismic retrofit schemes for rc structures and local-global consequences. Prog Struct Mat Eng 8:1–15CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Fabio Mazza (1)

    1. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Università della Calabria, Rende, Cosenza, Italy
  • 刊物类别:Earth and Environmental Science
  • 刊物主题:Earth sciences
    Geotechnical Engineering
    Civil Engineering
    Geophysics and Geodesy
    Hydrogeology
    Structural Geology
  • 出版者:Springer Netherlands
  • ISSN:1573-1456
文摘
A displacement-based design procedure using hysteretic damped braces (HYDBs) is proposed for the seismic retrofitting of unsymmetric-plan structures. An expression of the viscous damping equivalent to the hysteretic energy dissipated by the damped braced frame is proposed under bidirectional seismic loads, where corrective factors are assumed as a function of design parameters of the HYDBs. To this end, the nonlinear dynamic analysis of an equivalent two degree of freedom system is firstly carried out on seven pairs of real ground motions whose displacement response spectra match, on average, the design spectrum proposed by the Italian seismic code for a high-risk seismic zone and a medium subsoil class. Then, the extended N2 method considered by the European seismic code, which combines the nonlinear static analysis along the in-plan principal directions of the structure with elastic modal analysis, is adopted to evaluate the higher mode torsional effects. The town hall of Spilinga (Italy), a reinforced concrete (r.c.) framed building with an L-shaped plan, is supposed to be retrofitted with HYDBs. Six structural solutions are compared considering two alternative in-plan distributions of the HYDBs, to eliminate (elastic) torsional effects, and three design values of the frame ductility combined with a constant design value of the damper ductility. To check the effectiveness and reliability of the DBD procedure, the nonlinear static analysis of the test structures is carried out, by evaluating the vulnerability index of r.c. frame members and the ductility demand of HYDBs for different in-plan directions of the seismic loads.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700