Multi-level Systems and the Electoral Politics of Welfare Pluralism: Exploring Third-Sector Policy in UK Westminster and Regional Elections 1945-011
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Paul Chaney (1)
  • 关键词:Welfare pluralism ; Electoral politics ; Third sector ; Agenda ; setting ; Policy
  • 刊名:Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
  • 出版年:2014
  • 出版时间:June 2014
  • 年:2014
  • 卷:25
  • 期:3
  • 页码:585-611
  • 全文大小:
  • 参考文献:1. Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (1983). Welfare pluralism: The new face of Fabianism. / Critical Social Policy, / 3(9), 19-9. CrossRef
    2. Best, R., & Dunn, A. (2007). / The voluntary sector, the state and the law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
    3. Birrell, D., & Williamson, A. (2001). The voluntary-community sector and political development in Northern Ireland, since 1972. / Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit, / 12(3), 205-20. CrossRef
    4. Boyatzis, R. (1998). / Transforming qualitative information. London: Sage.
    5. Bratberg, ?. (2010). Institutional resilience meets critical junctures: [Re]allocation of power in three British parties post-devolution. / Publius: The Journal of Federalism, / 40(1), 59-1. CrossRef
    6. Budge, I., & Hofferbert, R. (1990). Mandates and policy outputs: U.S. party platforms and federal expenditures. / The American Political Science Review, / 84(1), 111-31. CrossRef
    7. Burt, E. (2007). Voluntary organizations in the democratic polity: Managing legitimacy, accountability and trust. / Public Money & Management, / 27(2), 157-60. CrossRef
    8. Burt, E., & Taylor, J. (2002). Scotland’s voluntary sector. In G. Hassan & C. Warhurst (Eds.), / Anatomy of the New Scotland: Power, influence and change (pp. 85-3). Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing.
    9. Casey, J. (2004). Third sector participation in the policy process: A framework for comparative analysis. / Policy & Politics, / 32(2), 241-57. CrossRef
    10. Chaney, P. (2011). / Equality and public policy. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
    11. Chaney, P, (2013) Electoral competition, issue-salience and public policy for older people: The case of the Westminster and regional UK elections 1945-011. / British Journal of Politics and International Relations [pre-publication early-view web version] (forthcoming). doi:10.1111/J.1467-856X.2011.00488.x .
    12. Chaney, P., & Drakeford, M. (2004). The primacy of ideology: Social policy and the first term of the National Assembly for Wales. / Social Policy Review, / 16, 121-42.
    13. Chaney, P., & Fevre, R. (2001). Inclusive governance and ‘minority-groups: The role of the third sector in Wales. / Voluntas: International Journal of Third Sector Research, / 12(2), 131-56. CrossRef
    14. Chaney, P., Hall, T., & Pithouse, A. (2001). / New governance—new democracy? Post devolution Wales. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
    15. Chen, S. (2002). State socialism and the welfare state: A critique of two conventional paradigms. / International Journal of Social Welfare, / 11(3), 228-42. CrossRef
    16. Cobb, R., & Ross, M. (1997). Agenda setting and the denial of agenda access: Key concepts. In R. W. Cobb & M. H. Ross (Eds.), / Cultural strategies of agenda denial. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
    17. Cohen, E. (1963). / The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    18. Conservative Party. (1945). / Mr. Churchill’s declaration of policy to the electors. London: Conservative Party.
    19. Conservative Party. (1955). / United for peace and progress: The Conservative and Unionist Party’s Policy. London: Conservative Party.
    20. Conservative Party. (1974). / Firm action for a fair Britain. London: Conservative Party.
    21. Conservative Party. (2010). / An invitation to join the Government of Britain. London: Conservative Party.
    22. Corbett, S., & Walker, A. (2012). The big society: Back to the future. / The Political Quarterly, / 83(3), 487-93. CrossRef
    23. Couto, R. (2001). The third sector and civil society: The case of the “YES-campaign in Northern Ireland. / Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit, / 12(3), 221-38. CrossRef
    24. Creed, W., Langstraat, J., & Scully, M. (2002). Picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics. / Organizational Research Methods, / 5(1), 34-5. CrossRef
    25. Crowson, N. (2011). Introduction: The voluntary sector in 1980s Britain. / Contemporary British History, / 25(4), 491-98. CrossRef
    26. Cymru, Plaid. (1999). / The manifesto of Plaid Cymru—the party of Wales. Cardiff: Plaid Cymru.
    27. Dahlberg, L. (2005). Interaction between voluntary and statutory social service provision in Sweden: A matter of welfare pluralism, substitution or complementarity? / Social Policy & Administration, / 39, 740-63. CrossRef
    28. Daly, S. (2011). Philanthropy, the big society and emerging philanthropic relationships in the UK. / Public Management Review, / 13(8), 1077-089. CrossRef
    29. Danson, M., & de Souza, (2012). / Regional development in Northern Europe: Peripherality marginality and border issues. Princeton, NJ: Routledge.
    30. Davies, J. (2012). Active citizenship: Navigating the conservative heartlands of the new labour project. / Policy and Politics, / 40(1), 3-9. CrossRef
    31. Deutsch, K., & Foltz, W. (Eds.). (1963). / Nation-Building. New York: Atherton Press.
    32. De Vreese, C., Peter, J., & Semetko, H. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. / Political Communication, / 18(2), 107-22. CrossRef
    33. Donnelly-Cox, G., Donoghue, F., & Hayes, T. (2001). Conceptualizing the third sector in Ireland, North and South. / Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, / 12(3), 195-11. CrossRef
    34. Doornbos, M. (2006). / Global forces and state restructuring: Dynamics of state formation and collapse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
    35. Driver, S., & Martell, L. (1998). / New labour: Politics after Thatcherism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    36. Elson, P. (2010). / High ideals and noble intentions: Voluntary sector-government relations in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    37. Evers, A. (1995). Part of the welfare mix: The third sector as an intermediate area. / Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, / 6(2), 159-82. CrossRef
    38. Evers, A., & Laville, J.-L. (Eds.). (2004). / The third sector in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    39. Fairclough, N. (2000). / New labour, new language. London: Routledge.
    40. Farrell, D., & Schmitt-Beck, R. (Eds.). (2002). / Do political campaigns matter? Campaign effects in elections and referendums. London: Routledge.
    41. Fearon, J. (2003). Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: Selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. In A. Przeworski, S. C. Stokes, & B. Manin (Eds.), / Democracy, accountability, and representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    42. Ferejohn, J. (2003). Accountability and authority: Toward a theory of political accountability. In B. Manin, B. Przeworski, & S. Stokes (Eds.), / Democracy, accountability and representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    43. Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). / The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. CrossRef
    44. Fyfe, N. (2005). Making space for “neo-communitarianism- The third sector, state and civil society in the UK. / Antipode, / 37(3), 536-57. CrossRef
    45. Fyfe, N., Timbrell, H., & Smith, F. (2006). The third sector in a devolved Scotland: From policy to evidence. / Critical Social Policy, / 26(3), 630-41. CrossRef
    46. Gamble, A. (2006). The constitutional revolution in the United Kingdom. / Publius, / 36(1), 19-5. CrossRef
    47. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power. / American Journal of Sociology, / 95(1), 1-7. CrossRef
    48. Giddens, A. (1998). / The third way: The renewal of social democracy. London: Polity Press.
    49. Halfpenny, P., & Reid, M. (2002). Research on the voluntary sector: An overview. / Policy and Politics, / 30(4), 533-48. CrossRef
    50. Hanlon, N., Rosenberg, M., & Clasby, R. (2007). Offloading social care responsibilities: Recent experiences of local voluntary organisations in a remote urban centre in British, Columbia, Canada. / Health and Social Care in the Community, / 15(4), 343-67. CrossRef
    51. Harrison, L., & McSweeney, D. (2008). National and local party election agendas. / Representation, / 44(1), 1-6. CrossRef
    52. Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. / Public Money & Management, / 25(1), 34-7.
    53. Haugh, H., & Kitson, M. (2007). The third way and the third sector: New Labour’s economic policy and the social economy. / Cambridge Journal of Economics, / 31(6), 973-94. CrossRef
    54. Hudson, B. (1992). Quasi-markets in health and social care in Britain: Can the public sector respond? / Policy and Politics, / 20(2), 131-43. CrossRef
    55. Impero Wilson, P. (2000). Deficit reduction as causal story: Strategic politics and welfare state retrenchment. / Social Science Journal, / 37(1), 97-21. CrossRef
    56. Joffe, D., & Yardley, H. (2003). Content and thematic analysis. In D. Marks & H. Yardley (Eds.), / Research methods for clinical and health psychology. London: Sage.
    57. Johnson, N. (1987). / The welfare state in transition: The theory and practice of welfare pluralism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
    58. Kendall, J. (2000). The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England in the late 1990s: Whys and wherefores. / Policy & Politics, / 28(4), 541-62. CrossRef
    59. Kendall, J., & Knapp, M. (1996). / The voluntary sector in the UK. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    60. Kerr, P., Byrne, C., & Foster, E. (2011). Theorising Cameronism. / Political Studies Review, / 9, 193-07. CrossRef
    61. Kidd, A. (2002). Civil society or the state?: Recent approaches to the history of voluntary welfare. / Journal of Historical Sociology, / 3, 328-46. CrossRef
    62. Klitgaard, M. (2007). Do welfare state regimes determine public sector reforms? Choice reforms in American, Swedish and German schools. / Scandinavian Political Studies, / 30(4), 444-62. CrossRef
    63. Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (1998). The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare State Institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries. / American Sociological Review, / 63(5), 661-87. CrossRef
    64. Krippendorff, K., & Bock, M. (2008). / The content analysis reader. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    65. Labour Party. (1983). / The new hope for Britain. London: Labour Party.
    66. Labour Party. (1987). / Britain will win with Labour. London: Labour Party.
    67. Labour Party. (1997). / Because Britain deserves better. London: Labour Party.
    68. Labour Party. (2001). / Ambitions for Britain. London: Labour Party.
    69. Labour Party. (2005). / Britain forward not back. London: Labour Party.
    70. Laffin, M., Shaw, E., & Taylor, G. (2007). The new sub-national politics of the British Labour Party. / Party Politics, / 13(1), 88-08. CrossRef
    71. Laforest, R. (2007). / The new federal policy agenda and the voluntary sector: On the cutting edge. Kingston, ON: School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University.
    72. Levi, Y. (2005). ‘Nonprofits-and ‘third sector- From deferential vagueness to potentials for innovation. / Journal of Co-operative Studies, / 38(2), 37-3.
    73. Levitas, R. (2012). The just’s umbrella: Austerity and the big society in coalition policy and beyond. / Critical Social Policy, / 32, 320-42. CrossRef
    74. Lewis, J. (2005). New Labour’s approach to the voluntary sector: Independence and the meaning of partnership. / Social Policy and Society, / 4(2), 121-41. CrossRef
    75. Libbrecht, L., Maddens, B., Swenden, W., & Fabre, E. (2009). Issue-salience in regional party manifestos in Spain. / European Journal of Political Research, / 48(1), 58-9. CrossRef
    76. Liberal-SDP Alliance. (1987). / Britain united: The time has come. London: Liberal-SDP Alliance.
    77. Lister, R. (1998). From equality to social inclusion: New Labour and the welfare state. / Critical Social Policy, / 18(55), 215-25. CrossRef
    78. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Steenbergen, M., & Bakker, R. (2007). Crossvalidating data on party positioning on European integration. / Electoral Studies, / 26(1), 23-9. CrossRef
    79. Meyers, M. K., Glaser, B., & Donald, K. M. (1998). On the front lines of welfare delivery: Are workers implementing policy re forms? / Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, / 17, 1-2. CrossRef
    80. National Council of Voluntary Organisations. (2012). / The UK civil society almanac 2012. London: NCVO.
    81. Nelson, T., & Oxleya, Z. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. / The Journal of Politics, / 61(4), 1040-067. CrossRef
    82. Northern Ireland Council for Voluntary Action. (2009). / State of the sector V—Northern Ireland voluntary and community sector almanac 2009. Belfast: NICVA.
    83. Osterle, A. (2002). Evaluating equity in social policy: A framework for comparative analysis. / Evaluation, / 8(1), 46-7. CrossRef
    84. Papacharissi, Z. (2008). News frames terrorism: A comparative analysis of frames employed in terrorism coverage in U.S. and U.K. newspapers. / The International Journal of Press/Politics, / 13(1), 52-4. CrossRef
    85. Perkins, N., Smith, K., Hunter, D., Barnbra, C., & Joyce, K. (2010). What counts is what works- New Labour and partnerships in public health. / Policy and Politics, / 38(1), 101-23. CrossRef
    86. Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. / American Journal of Political Science, / 40(3), 825-50. CrossRef
    87. Popple, K., & Redmond, M. (2000). Community development and the voluntary sector in the new millennium: The implications of the Third Way in the UK. / Community Development Journal, / 35(4), 391-00. CrossRef
    88. Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., & Manin, B. (Eds.). (1999). / Elections and representation, chapter one in democracy, accountability, and representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    89. RePass, D. (1971). Issue-salience and party choice. / American Political Science Review, / 65, 389-00. CrossRef
    90. Robertson, D. (1976). / A theory of party competition. New York: Wiley.
    91. Royed, T. (1996). Testing the mandate model in Britain and in the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras. / British Journal of Political Science, / 26(1), 56-9. CrossRef
    92. Ruiter, S., & De Graf, N. D. (2006). National context, religiosity, and volunteering: Results from 53 countries. / American Sociological Review, / 71(2), 191-10. CrossRef
    93. Salamon, L. M. (1995). / Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    94. Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, W. S. (2003). Institutional roots of volunteering. In D. Paul & L. Halman (Eds.), / The values of volunteering: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 71-0). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. CrossRef
    95. Schon, D., & Rein, M. (1994). / Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
    96. Scottish Conservatives. (2011). / Common sense for Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Conservatives.
    97. Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations. (2012). / Scottish third sector key statistics. Edinburgh: SCVO.
    98. Scottish Liberal Democrats. (1999). / Raising the standard. Edinburgh: Scottish Liberal Democrats.
    99. Scottish National Party. (1999). / Enterprise, compassion, democracy. Edinburgh: Scottish National Party.
    100. Scottish National Party. (2003). / The complete case Jura better Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish National Party.
    101. Sobieraj, S. (2006). Association mobilization around the 2000 presidential campaign. / Sociological Inquiry, / 76(1), 52-0. CrossRef
    102. Social Democratic Labour Party. (2007). / Let’s deliver real progress. Dublin: SDLP.
    103. Stimson, J. (2003). Party government and responsiveness. In B. Manin, A. Przeworski, & S. Stokes (Eds.), / Democracy, accountability and representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    104. Stokes, D. (1992). Valence polities. In D. Kavanagh (Ed.), / Electoral politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    105. Sutherland, C. (2005). Nation-building through discourse theory. / Nations and Nationalism, / 11(2), 185-02. CrossRef
    106. Taylor, M., & Kendall, J. (1996). History of the voluntary sector. In J. Kendall & M. Knapp (Eds.), / The voluntary sector in the UK. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    107. Taylor, M., & Lansley, J. (1992). Ideology and welfare in the UK voluntary sector. / Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, / 3(2), 153-74. CrossRef
    108. Topf, R. (1994). Party manifestos. In A. Heath, R. Jovell, & J. Curtice (Eds.), / Labour’s last chance: 1992 election and beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
    109. Ungerson, C., & Yeandle, S. (2007). / Cash for care in developed welfare states. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
    110. Viroli, M. (2000). Republican patriotism. In C. McKinnon & I. Hampsher-Monk (Eds.), / The demands of citizenship (pp. 267-75). New York: Continuum.
    111. Volkens, A. (2001). Manifesto research since 1979: From reliability to validity. In M. Laver (Ed.), / Estimating the policy positions of political actors. London: Routledge.
    112. Wales Council for Voluntary Action. (2012). / Basic statistics of the voluntary sector January 2012. Cardiff: WCVA.
    113. Walker, A. (1983). Labour’s social plans: The limits of welfare statism. / Critical Social Policy, / 3(8), 45-5. CrossRef
    114. Walzer, M. (1992). The civil society argument. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), / Dimensions of radical democracy: Pluralism, citizenship, community (pp. 89-07). London: Verso.
    115. Welsh Liberal Democrats. (2003). / Deliver the difference for Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Labour Party.
    116. Welsh Liberal Democrats. (2007). / A fair green future. Cardiff: Welsh Labour Party.
    117. Whelan, R. (2008). British social housing and the voluntary sector. / Economic Affairs, / 28(2), 5-1. CrossRef
    118. Wilding, P. (1992). The British welfare state: Thatcherisrn’s enduring legacy. / Policy and Politics, / 20(3), 201-12. CrossRef
    119. Wilson, A. (1993). / Towards an integration of content analysis and discourse analysis. Lancaster: Lancaster University Unit for Computer Research on the English Language Technical Papers No. 3.
    120. Wincott, D. (2005). Reshaping public space? Devolution and policy change in British early childhood education and care. / Regional & Federal Studies, / 15(4), 453-70. CrossRef
    121. Wyn Jones, R., & Paterson, L. (1999). Welsh devolution—the past and the future. In B. Taylor & K. Thomson (Eds.), / Scotland and Wales: Nations again?. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
    122. Zirnmer, A. (2003). Welfare pluralism and health care: The case of Germany. In J. Kovacs (Ed.), / The politics of welfare reform—east and west between governmental policy and civic initiative. New York: Routledge.
  • 作者单位:Paul Chaney (1)

    1. Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Glamorgan Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cathays Park, Cardiff, CF10 3WT, Wales, UK
  • ISSN:1573-7888
文摘
Electoral politics constitute a formative, agenda-setting phase in the development of mixed-economy approaches to social welfare. This study examines issue-salience and policy framing related to the welfare role of the third sector in party manifestos in UK Westminster and regional elections 1945-011. The findings reveal a pronounced increase in salience over recent decades. Welfare pluralism, whereby voluntary organisations complement state and market-based services, is shown to be the dominant approach at both state-wide and regional levels. Yet election data also reveal inter-party and inter-polity contrasts in policy framing. This is significant to contemporary understanding of mixed-economy approaches to welfare because it shows electoral discourse to be a driver of policy divergence in multi-level systems. The result is differing policy prescriptions for the third sector that (re-)define governance practices and underpin the rise and territorialisation of welfare pluralism. In turn this poses questions about policy co-ordination and differential welfare rights in the unitary state.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700