Comparative Study on Failure Prediction in Warm Forming Processes of Mg Alloy Sheet by the FEM and Ductile Fracture Criteria

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Sang-Woo Kim (1)
  Young-Seon Lee (1)
  
• 刊名：Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：April 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：45
• 期：2
• 页码：445-453
• 全文大小：3,918 KB
• 参考文献：1. S. Lee. Y.H. Chen and J.W. Wang: / J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2002, Vol. 124, pp. 19- / 24. CrossRef
  2. S. Yoshihara. K. Manabea and H. Nishimura: / J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, Vol. 170, pp. 579- / 585. CrossRef
  3. S.W. Kim, Y.S. Lee, Y.N. Kwon and J.H. Lee: / Steel Res. Int., 2008, Vol. 79, pp. 691- / 698.
  4. Q. Zhang, H. Guo, F. Xiao, L. Gao, A.B. Bondarev and W. Han: / J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, Vol. 209, pp. 5514- / 5520. CrossRef
  5. Z. Meng, S. Huang, K. Hu, W. Huang and Z. Xia: / J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, Vol. 211, pp. 863- / 867. CrossRef
  6. S.P. Keeler and W.A. Backofen: / ASM Trans. Quart., 1964, Vol. 56, pp. 25-em class="a-plus-plus">48.
  7. Y.S. Lee, Y.N. Kwon, S.H. Kang, S.W. Kim and J.H. Lee: / J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, Vol. 201, pp. 431- / 435. CrossRef
  8. A.F. Graf and W.F. Hosford: / Met. Trans. A., 1993, Vol. 24A, pp. 2503- / 2512. CrossRef
  9. H.J. Kleemola and M.T. Pelkkikangas: / Sheet Metal Indust., 1977, Vol. 63, pp. 591- / 592.
  10. M.G. Cockcroft and D.J. Latham: / J. Inst. Metals, 1968, Vol. 96, pp. 33- / 39.
  11. F.A. McClintock: / Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech., 1968, Vol. 17, pp. 363- / 371. CrossRef
  12. J.R. Rice and D.M. Tracey: / J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1969, Vol. 17, pp. 201- / 217. CrossRef
  13. P. Brozzo, B. DeLuka, and R. Rendia: / Proc. 7th Biennial Conf. Int. Deep Draw. Res. Group Sheet Met. Form. Formab., 1972.
  14. S.I. Oh, C.C. Chen and S. Kobayashi: / Trans. ASME J. Engr. Indus., 1979, Vol. 101, pp. 23- / 44. CrossRef
  15. M. Oyane,T. Sato, K. Okimoto and S. Shima: / J. Mech. Work. Technol., 1980, Vol. 4, pp. 65- / 81. CrossRef
  16. S.E. Clift, P. Hartley, C.E.N. Sturgess and G.W. Rowe: / Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1990, Vol. 32, pp. 1- / 17. CrossRef
  17. M. Ayada, T. Higashino and K. Mori: / Adv. Technol. of Plasticity, 1987, Vol. 1, pp. 553- / 558.
  18. H. Takuda, T. Yoshii and N. Hatta: / J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1999, Vol. 89- / 90, pp. 135- / 140. CrossRef
  19. H. Takuda, T. Morishita, T. Kinoshita and N. Shirakawa: / J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, Vol. 164- / 165, pp. 1258- / 1262. CrossRef
  20. Y.Q. Cheng, H. Zhang, Z.H. Chen and K.F. Xian: / J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, Vol. 208, pp. 29- / 34. CrossRef
  21. I. Ulacia, C.P. Salisbury, I. Hurtado and M.J. Worswick: / J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, Vol. 211, pp. 830- / 839. CrossRef
  22. S. Yi, J. Bohlen, F. Heinemann and D. Letzig / : Acta Mater., 2010, Vol. 58, pp. 592- / 605. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Sang-Woo Kim (1)
  Young-Seon Lee (1)
  
  1. Department of Materials Deformation, Korea Institute of Materials Science, Changwon, Gyeongnam, Republic of Korea
  
• ISSN：1543-1916

文摘

An important concern in metal forming is whether the desired deformation can be accomplished without any failure of the material, even at elevated temperatures. This paper describes the utilization of ductile fracture criteria in conjunction with the finite element (FE) method for predicting the onset of fracture in warm metal working processes of magnesium alloy sheets. The uniaxial tensile tests of AZ31 alloy sheets with a thickness of 3?mm and FE simulations were performed to calculate the critical damage values for three kinds of ductile fracture criteria. The critical damage values for each criterion were expressed as the function of strain rate at various temperatures. In order to find out the best criterion for failure prediction, Erichsen cupping tests under isothermal conditions were carried out at various temperatures and punch velocities. Based on the plastic deformation histories obtained from FE analysis of the Erichsen cupping tests and the critical damage value curves, the initiation time and location of fracture were predicted under bi-axial tensile conditions. As a result, Cockcroft–Latham’s criterion showed good agreement with the experiments.