The interphase finite element
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Giuseppe Giambanco (1) giuseppe.giambanco@unipa.it
    Giuseppe Fileccia Scimemi (1)
    Antonino Spada (1)
  • 关键词:Heterogeneous materials – ; Mesomodelling – ; Interphase – ; Finite element
  • 刊名:Computational Mechanics
  • 出版年:2012
  • 出版时间:September 2012
  • 年:2012
  • 卷:50
  • 期:3
  • 页码:353-366
  • 全文大小:641.3 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Del Piero G (1989) Constitutive equation and compatibility of external loads for linear elastic masonry-like materials. Meccanica 24: 150–162
    2. Pietruszczak S, Niu X (1992) A mathematical description of macroscopic behaviour of brick masonry. Int J Solids Struct 29: 531–546
    3. De Buhan P, De Felice G (1997) A homogenization approach to the ultimate strength of brick masonry. J Mech Phys Solids 45: 1085–1104
    4. Bolzon G, Ghilotti D, Maier G (2002) Strength of periodic elastic-brittle composites evaluated through homogenization and parameter identification. Eur J Mech A 21: 355–378
    5. Page AW (1978) Finite element model for masonry. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 104(8): 1267–1285
    6. Stankowski T, Runesson K, Sture S (1993) Fracture and slip of interfaces in cementitious composites. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 119(2): 292–314
    7. Lofti HR, Shing PB (1994) Interface model applied to fracture of masonry structures. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 120(1): 63–80
    8. Lourenco PB, Rots JG (1997) Multisurface interface model for analysis of masonry structures. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 123(7): 660– 668
    9. Giambanco G, Rizzo S, Spallino R (2001) Numerical analysis of masonry structures via interface models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190: 6493–6511
    10. Allix O, Ladeveze P (1992) Interlaminar interface modelling for the prediction of laminates delamination. Compos Struct 22: 235–242
    11. Allix O, Ladeveze P, Corigliano A (1995) Damage analysis of interlaminar fracture specimens. Compos Struct 31: 61–74
    12. Allix O, Leveque D, Perret L (1998) Identification and forecast of delamination in composite laminates by an interlaminar interface model. Compos Sci Technol 58: 671–678
    13. Corigliano A, Allix O (2000) Some aspects of interlaminar degradation in composites. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2: 203–224
    14. Alfano G, Crisfield MA (2001) Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50: 1701–1736
    15. Massabo’ R, Mumm D, Cox B (1998) Characterising mode II delamination cracks in stitched composites. Int J Fract 92(1): 1–38
    16. Ming H, Cox BN (1998) Crack bridging by through-thickness reinforcement in delaminating curved structures. Composites A 29: 377–393
    17. Cottone A, Turetta T, Giambanco G (2007) Delamination study of through-thickness reinforced composite laminates via two-phase interface model. Composites A 38: 1985–1995
    18. Herrmann LR (1978) Finite element analysis of contact problems. ASCE J Eng Mech 104: 1043–1057
    19. Zavarise G, Wriggers P, Schrefler BA (1998) A method for solving contact problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 42: 473–498
    20. Griffiths DV (1985) Numerical modelling of interfaces using conventional finite elements. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Nagoya, pp 837–844
    21. Goodman RE, Taylor RL, Brekke TL (1968) A model for the mechanics of jointed rock. ASCE J Soil Mech Found Div 94: 637–659
    22. Beer G (1985) An isoparametric joint/interface element for finite element analysis. Int J Numer Method Eng 21: 585–600
    23. Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44: 1267–1282
    24. Schellekens JCJ, de Borst R (1993) On the numerical integration of interface elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 36: 43–66
    25. Kaliakin VN, Li J (1995) Inside into deficiencies associated with commonly used zero-thickness interface elements. Comput Geomech. 17: 225–252
    26. Giambanco G, Mroz Z (2001) The interphase model for the analysis of joints in rock masses and masonry structures. Meccanica 36: 111–130
    27. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Too JM (1971) Reduced integration technique in general analysis of plates and shells. Int J Numer Methods Eng 3: 275–290
    28. Hughes TJR, Cohen M, Harouna M (1978) Reduced and selective integration techniques in the finite element analysis of plates. Nucl Eng Des 46: 203–222
    29. Simo JC, Rifai MS (1990) A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 29: 1595–1638
    30. Arnold DN, Brezzi F (1997) The partial selective reduced integration method and applications to shell problems. Comput Struct 64: 879–880
    31. Taylor RL, Beresford PJ, Wilson EL (1976) A non-conforming element for stress analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 10: 1211–1219
    32. Lourenco PB, Rots JG, Vander Pluijm R (1999) Understanding the tensile behavior of masonry panel parallel to the bed joints: a numerical approach. Mason Int 12: 96–103
  • 作者单位:1. Department of Civil, Environmental and Aerospace Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
  • ISSN:1432-0924
文摘
Mesomodelling of structures made of heterogeneous materials requires the introduction of mechanical models which are able to simulate the interactions between the adherents. Among these devices is quite popular the zero thickness interface (ZTI) model where the contact tractions and the displacement discontinuities are the primary static and kinematic variables. In some cases the joint response depends also on the internal stresses and strains within the thin layer adjacent to the joint interfaces. The interphase model, taking into account these additional variables, represents a sort of enhanced ZTI. In this paper a general theoretical formulation of the interphase model is reported and an original finite element, suitable for two-dimensional applications, is presented. A simple numerical experiment in plane stress state condition shows the relevant capabilities of the interphase element and allows to investigate its numerical performance. Some defects related to the shear locking of the element are resolved making use of well known numerical strategies. Finally, further numerical application to masonry structures are developed.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700