Perceived Barriers to Adopting an Asian-Language Quitline Service: A Survey of State Funding Agencies
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Yue-Lin Zhuang (1)
Sharon E. Cummins (1)
Hye-ryeon Lee (2)
James Dearing (3)
Carrie Kirby (1)
Shu-Hong Zhu (14) szhu@ucsd.edu - 关键词：Disparity – ; Asian population – ; Quitline – ; Adoption of innovation
- 刊名：Journal of Community Health
- 出版年：2012
- 出版时间：October 2012
- 年：2012
- 卷：37
- 期：5
- 页码：1058-1065
- 全文大小：234.6 KB
- 参考文献：1. Zhu, S. H., Stretch, V., Galabanis, M., Rosbrook, B., Sadler, G., & Pierce, J. P. (1996). Telephone counseling for smoking cessation: effects of single-session and multiple-session interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(1), 202–211.
2. Anderson, C. M., & Zhu, S. H. (2007). Tobacco quitlines: Looking back and looking ahead. Tobacco Control, 16(Suppl 1), i81–i86.
3. Keller, P. A., Feltracco, A., & Bailey, L. A., et al. (2010). Changes in tobacco quitlines in the United States, 2005–2006. Preventing Chronic Diseases, 7(2), A36.
4. Fiore, M. C., Jaen, C. R., Baker, T. B., et al. (2008). Treating tobacco use and dependence: Clinical practice guideline. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
5. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. (2001). Recommendations regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(2S), 10–15.
6. North American Quitline Consortium. (n.d.). All quitline facts: An overview of the NAQC 2009 annual survey of quitlines. Retrived from http://www.naquitline.org/resource/resmgr/QL_About_Facts/2009-Survey_All-Quitline-Fac.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2011.
7. Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: models, methods, and findings (pp. 149–158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Farrelly, M. C., Hussin, A., & Bauer, U. E. (2007). Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of television, radio and print advertisements in promoting the New York smokers’ quitline. Tobacco Control, 16(Suppl 1), i21–i23.
9. Mosbaek, C. H., Austin, D. F., Stark, M. J., & Lambert, L. C. (2007). The association between advertising and calls to a tobacco quitline. Tobacco Control, 16(Suppl 1), i24–i29.
10. Zhu, S. H., Wong, S., Stevens, C., Nakashima, D., & Gamst, A. (2010). Use of a smokers’ quitline by Asian language speakers: Results from 15 years of operation in California. American Journal of Public Health, 100(5), 846–852.
11. Dearing, J. W., & Meyer, G. (1994). An exploratory tool for predicting adoption decisions. Science Communication, 16(1), 43–57.
12. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). American FactFinder: Hispanic or Latino, and no Hispanic or Latino by race. Retrived from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_PL_P2&prodType=table. Accessed December 13, 2011.
13. Humes, K. R., Jones, N. A., & Ramirez, R. R. (2010). Overview of race and Hispanic origin: 2010. In 2010 census briefs. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2010.
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2007). Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs—2007. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2008). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
16. SAS Institute. (2008). SAS version 9.2 language reference: Concepts. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
17. Lee, S. (2003). Review of language and other communication barriers in health care. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Public Health and Science, Office of Minority Health.
18. Burton, D., Zeng, X. X., Chin, C. H., et al. (2010). A phone-counseling smoking-cessation intervention for male Chinese restaurant workers. Journal of Community Health, 35(6), 579–585.
19. Cox, L. S., Okuyemi, K., Choi, W. S., & Ahluwalia, J. S. (2011). A review of tobacco use treatments in U.S. ethnic minority populations. American Journal of Health Promotion, 25(S5), S11–S30.
20. Wong, C. C., Tsoh, J. Y., Tong, E. K., Hom, F. B., Cooper, B., & Chow, E. A. (2008). The Chinese community smoking cessation project: A community sensitive intervention trial. Journal of Community Health, 33(6), 363–373.
21. Abdullah, A. S. M., Lam, T. H., Chan, S. S. C., & Hedley, A. J. (2004). Which smokers use the smoking cessation Quitline in Hong Kong, and how effective is the Quitline? Tobacco Control, 13(4), 415–421.
22. Hsu, P. T., & Chiang, C. W. (2011). Taiwan smokers’ helpline. In Presented at the 2011 Asian Pacific quitline workshop, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
23. Yunibhand, J. (2011). Thailand Report on Quitline Activities. In Presented at the 2011 Asian Pacific quitline workshop, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
24. Zhu, S. H., Cummins, S. E., Wong, S., Gamst, A. C., Tedeschi, G. J., & Reyes-Nocon, J. (in press). The effects of a multi-lingual quitline for Asian smokers: A randomized trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
25. Barclay, S., Todd, C., Finlay, I., Grande, G., & Wyatt, P. (2002). Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Family Practice, 19(1), 105–111.
26. Barry, M. B., Saul, J., & Bailey, L. A. (2010). U.S. quitlines at a crossroads: Utilization, budget, and service trends 2005–2010. Retrived from http://www.naquitline.org/resource/resmgr/reports_2010/100407_special-report.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2011.
27. California Department of Public Health, California Tobacco Control Program. (2009). California tobacco control update 2009: 20 years of tobacco control in California, Sacramento, CA.
28. Rothemich, S. F., Woolf, S. H., Johnson, R. E., et al. (2010). Promoting primary care smoking-cessation support with quitlines: the quitlink randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38(4), 367–374.
29. Liao, Y., Bang, D., & Cosgrove, S., et al. (2011). Surveillance of health status in minority communities—racial and ethnic approaches to community health across the U.S. (REACH U.S.) risk factor survey, United States, 2009. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 60(SS-6), 1–44. - 作者单位：1. Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA2. Department of Communicology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honululu, HI, USA3. Kaiser Permanente Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO, USA4. Cancer Center 0905, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0905, USA
- ISSN：1573-3610
文摘
This study examined the perceived barriers to adopting an Asian-language quitline service among agencies that fund current state quitline services across the U.S. A self-administered survey on organizational readiness was sent to the funding agencies of 47 states plus Washington D.C. that currently fund state quitlines in English and Spanish, but not in Asian languages (response rate = 58%). The 2010 Census and the 2009 North American Quitline Consortium Survey were used to obtain the proportion of Asians among the state population and state quitline funding level, respectively. The most frequently cited reasons for not adopting an Asian quitline are: the Asian population in the state would be too small (71.4%), costs of service would be too high (57.1%), and the belief that using third-party translation for counseling is sufficient (39.3%). However, neither the actual proportion of Asians among the state population (range = 0.7% to 7.3%), nor the quitline funding level (range = 0.17 to0.17 to 20.8 per capita) predicts the reported reasons. The results indicate that quitline funding agencies need more education on the necessity and the feasibility of an Asian-language quitline. Three states are currently participating in a multi-state Asian-language quitline in which each state promotes the service to its residents and one state (CA) provides the services for all the states. This centralized multi-state Asian-language quitline operation, which helps reduce practical barriers in adoption and disparity in access to service, could be extended.