Optimization of Anaerobic Co-digestion of Strawberry and Fish Waste

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Antonio Serrano (1)
  José A. Siles (1)
  M. Carmen Gutiérrez (1)
  M. ángeles Martín (1)
  
• 关键词：Strawberry extrudate ; Fish waste ; Anaerobic co ; digestion ; Optimization ; Chloride ; Free ammonia
• 刊名：Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：July 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：173
• 期：6
• 页码：1391-1404
• 全文大小：365 KB
• 参考文献：1. FAOSTAT http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor (accessed 3.14.2013).
  2. Ayalon, O., Avnimelech, Y., & Shechter, M. (2001). / Environmental Management, 27, 697-04. CrossRef
  3. R?dsrud, G., Lersch, M., & Sj?de, A. (2012). / Biomass Bioenergy, 46, 46-9. mbioe.2012.03.028" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  4. Verstraete, W. (2010). / Special Abstracts/Journal of Biotechnology, 150S, S1–S576.
  5. Ahn, H. K., Smith, M. C., Kondrad, S. L., & White, J. W. (2010). / Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 160, 965-75. CrossRef
  6. Forgács, G., Lundin, M., Taherzadeh, M. J., & Sárvári Horváth, I. (2013). / Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 169, 2016-028. CrossRef
  7. Gavala, H. N., Yenal, U., Skiadas, I. V., Westermann, P., & Ahring, B. K. (2003). / Water Research, 37, 4561-572. CrossRef
  8. Wheatley, A. (1990). / Anaerobic digestion: a waste treatment technology, ed. London: Elsevier.
  9. Fountoulakis, M. S., Petousi, I., & Manios, T. (2010). / Waste Management, 30, 1849-853. man.2010.04.011" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  10. Siles, J. A., Serrano, A., Martín, A., & Martín, M. A. (2013). / Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 190-97. CrossRef
  11. Chen, Y., Chen, J. J., & Creamer, K. S. (2008). / Bioresource Technology, 99, 4044-064. CrossRef
  12. Nges, I. A., Mbatia, B., & Bj?rnsson, L. (2012). / Journal of Environmental Management, 110, 159-65. man.2012.06.011" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  13. Mshandete, A., Kivaisi, A., Rubindamayugi, M., & Mattiasson, B. (2004). / Bioresource Technology, 95, 19-4. CrossRef
  14. Serrano, A., Siles, J. A., Chica, A. F., & Martín, M. A. (2013). / Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, 125-32. CrossRef
  15. APHA (1989) “Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater- APHA, AWWA & WPCF.
  16. US Composting Council (2001) Test methods for the examination of composting and compost.
  17. álvarez, J. A., Otero, L., & Lema, J. M. (2010). / Bioresource Technology, 101, 1153-158. CrossRef
  18. Hills, D. J. (1979). / Agricultural Wastes, 1, 267-78. CrossRef
  19. Cheng, F., Boe, K., & Angelidaki, I. (2011). / Water Research, 45, 3473-480. CrossRef
  20. Ortega, L., Husser, C., Barrington, S., & Guiot, S. R. (2008). / Water Science and Technology, 57, 419-22. CrossRef
  21. Aiyuk, S., Forrez, I., Lieven, D. K., van Haandel, A., & Verstraete, W. (2006). / Bioresource Technology, 97, 2225-241. CrossRef
  22. Field, J., Sierra-Alvarez, R., Lettinga, G. (1988). Ensayos anaerobios (Anaerobic assays). 4° Seminario de Depuración Anaerobia de Aguas Residuales. Universidad de Valladolid, Spain.
  23. Emerson, K., Russo, R. C., Lund, R. E., & Thurston, R. V. (1978). / Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 32, 2379-383. CrossRef
  24. ?stergaard, N. (1985). Biogasproduktion i det thermofile temperaturinterval. STUB rapport nr. 21. Kemiteknik Dansk Teknologisk Institut, Taastrup, Denmark.
  25. Fannin, K.F. (1987). in Anaerobic digestion of biomass: start-up, operation, stability and control (Chynoweth, D.P., Isaacson, R., ed.), Elsevier, London, UK, p. 171-196.
  26. Balaguer, M. D., Vicent, M. T., & Paris, J. M. (1992). / Biotechnology Letters, 14, 433-38. CrossRef
  27. Fernández, R. (2001). / Diploma de Estudios Avanzados. Córdoba: Universidad de Córdoba.
  28. Eiroa, M., Costa, J. C., Alves, M. M., Kennes, C., & Veiga, M. C. (2012). / Waste Management, 32, 1347-352. man.2012.03.020" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  29. Dai, X., Duan, N., Dong, B., & Dai, L. (2013). / Waste Management, 33, 308-16. man.2012.10.018" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  30. Gebauer, R. (2004). / Bioresource Technology, 93, 155-67. CrossRef
  31. Carlsson, M., Lagerkvist, A., & Morgan-Sagastume, F. (2012). / Waste Management, 32, 1634-650. man.2012.04.016" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  32. Macauley, J., Qiang, Z., Adams, C., Surampalli, R., & Mormile, M. (2006). / Water Research, 40, 2017-026. CrossRef
  33. Nallathambi, V. (1998). / Biomass Bioenergy, 14, 179-84. CrossRef
  34. Britz, T. J., Noeth, C., & Lategan, P. M. (1988). / Water Research, 22, 163-69. CrossRef
  35. Alphenaar, P. A., Sleyster, R., Reuver, P., Ligthart, G. J., & Lettinga, G. (1993). / Water Research, 27, 749-56. CrossRef
  36. Lin, C. Y., & Lay, C. H. (2004). / International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29, 275-81. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Antonio Serrano (1)
  José A. Siles (1)
  M. Carmen Gutiérrez (1)
  M. ángeles Martín (1)
  
  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cordoba (Spain), Campus Universitario de Rabanales, Edificio Marie Curie (C-3). Ctra. N IV, km 396, 14071, Cordoba, Spain
  
• ISSN：1559-0291

文摘

Anaerobic co-digestion of agri-food waste is a promising management alternative. Its implementation, however, requires evaluating the proportion in which waste should be mixed to optimize their centralized treatment. The combined treatment of strawberry extrudate and fish waste, which are widely generated in Mediterranean areas, was optimized. Strawberry extrudate and fish waste were mixed and treated at different proportions (88:12, 94:6, and 97:3, respectively; wet basis). The proportions selected for the mixture allow the different flows to be absorbed simultaneously. The highest methane production was observed for the ratio 94:6 (0.205?m3 STP CH4/kg volatile solid) (VS) (STP; 0?°C, 1?atm), with a methane production rate in the range of 5?·-0?-?·-0??m3 STP/kg VS?·?d, while the highest organic loading rate was observed for the mixture at a proportion 88:12 (1.9?±-.1?kg VS/m3?·?d). Biodegradability was found to be similar for the 88:12 and 94:6 proportions, with values around 90?% in VS. Nevertheless, the 97:3 ratio was not viable due to a low methane production. An inhibition phenomenon occurred at increasing loads due to the effect of some compounds contained in the fish waste such as chloride or nitrogen.